| Small Cell Lung Cancer |
|
|
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is so called because under the microscope the cancer cells look small; it is also called oat cell cancer. SCLC accounts for just under approximately a 6th of all lung cancers and is usually caused by smoking. Incidence has been declining in countries where there have been reductions in the number of people who smoke.
Menu: Small Cell Lung Cancer
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research Publications
Lung CancerInformation Patients and the Public (7 links)
- Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Treating small cell lung cancer
Macmillan Cancer Support
Content is developed by a team of information development nurses and content editors, and reviewed by health professionals. Further info. - Lung Cancer - Small Cell
MedlinePlus.gov
Produced by The National Library of Medicine with expert Advisory Board with representatives from the National Institutes of Health. Further info.
Covers causes, symptoms, examinations/tests, treatment and other topics. - Small Cell Lung Cancer
http://www.hemonc101.com/
Dr. Tony Talebi discusses "What is Small Cell lung Cancer?" with Dr. Gomez from the University of Miami. - Lung cancer - small cell
Cancer Council Australia
Short overview of SCLC - LUNG-SCLC@LISTSERV.ACOR.ORG
ACOR
Email discussion and support list - Small Cell Lung Cancer
American Cancer Society
Detailed information about SCLC, risk factors, treatment, support and research.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (6 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Lung Cancer, Small Cell - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Lung Cancer, Small Cell
MeSH term: Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Small Cell Lung Cancer
NHS Evidence
Regularly updated and reviewed. Further info.
Search of NHS Evidence - Clinical Trials - Small Cell Lung Cancer
National Cancer Institute
Search of the NCI's database of 12,000+ clinical trials from around the world. - Small Cell Lung Cancer
Medscape
Detailed referenced article by Winston Tan, MD, covering background, presentation, diagnosis, workup and treatment. - Trends in incidence of small cell lung cancer and all lung cancers
National Cancer Intelligence Network
Analysis of the trends in incidence of SCLC compared toh the trends in all lung cancer overall among males and females in South East England between 1970 and 2007. Published 2011.
Latest Research Publications
This list of publications is regularly updated (Source: PubMed).
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® radiation therapy for small-cell lung cancer.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013; 36(2):206-13 [PubMed]
Safety and efficacy of platinum agents plus etoposide for patients with small cell lung cancer with interstitial lung disease.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):1175-9 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients received platinum agents plus etoposide as first-line chemotherapy for SCLC with pre-existing ILD. The clinical characteristics, treatment outcome and survival of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: During first-line chemotherapy, only one (2%) out of the 52 patients developed an acute exacerbation of ILD. The median number of treatment cycles was four. The overall response rate was 69%. The median progression-free survival period was 4.5 months. The median survival time was 9.4 months. Thirty-three patients (63%) received at least one subsequent chemotherapy regimen, and five of these patients developed acute exacerbation of ILD.
CONCLUSION: The combination of platinum agents plus etoposide is feasible and effective in SCLC patients with pre-existing ILD, compared with regimens after second-line chemotherapy.
Alternating chemotherapy with amrubicin plus cisplatin and weekly administration of irinotecan plus cisplatin for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):1117-23 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with previously-untreated ED-SCLC were enrolled in the study. At least four courses of chemotherapy consisting of alternation of two drug combinations were given: alternating cycles of amrubicin and cisplatin with weekly administration of irinotecan and cisplatin at 3- or 4-week intervals.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 85.0% (17/20). The median duration of overall survival and progression-free survival were 359 days and 227 days, respectively. Hematological toxicity was the main adverse event. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were observed in 20 (100%), 4 (20%) and 6 (30%) patients, respectively. With regard to non-hematological adverse events, grade 3 or 4 anorexia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia and infection were observed in 5 (25%), 2 (10%), 2 (10%) and 2 (10%) patients, respectively. No treatment-related death occurred during either regimen.
CONCLUSION: The novel alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy was probably active against ED-SCLC and had acceptable toxicities. Further evaluation of this treatment for ED-SCLC in randomized phase III trials is warranted.
Mechanistic links between COPD and lung cancer.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2013; 13(4):233-45 [PubMed]
Long-term survival of a small cell lung cancer patient with proper endobronchial management.
Pneumologia. 2012 Oct-Dec; 61(4):245-8 [PubMed]
Neural lineage-specific homeoprotein BRN2 is directly involved in TTF1 expression in small-cell lung cancer.
Lab Invest. 2013; 93(4):408-21 [PubMed]
Small-cell lung cancer: an update on targeted therapies.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013; 779:385-404 [PubMed]
Penetration of recommended procedures for lung cancer staging and management in the United States over 10 years: a quality research in radiation oncology survey.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85(4):1082-9 [PubMed]
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient, staging work-up, and treatment characteristics were extracted from the process survey database of the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO), consisting of records of 340 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) at 44 institutions and of 144 patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) at 39 institutions. Data were compared for patients treated in 2006-2007 versus those for patients treated in 1998-1999.
RESULTS: Use of all recommended procedures for staging and treatment was more common in 2006-2007. Specifically, disease was staged with brain imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) and whole-body imaging (positron emission tomography or bone scanning) in 66% of patients with LA-NSCLC in 2006-2007 (vs 42% in 1998-1999, P=.0001) and in 84% of patients with LS-SCLC in 2006-2007 (vs 58.3% in 1998-1999, P=.0011). Concurrent chemoradiation was used for 77% of LA-NSCLC patients (vs 45% in 1998-1999, P<.0001) and for 90% of LS-SCLC patients (vs 62.5% in 1998-1999, P<.0001). Use of the recommended radiation dose (59-74 Gy for NSCLC and 60-70 Gy as once-daily therapy for SCLC) did not change appreciably, being 88% for NSCLC in both periods and 51% (2006-2007) versus 43% (1998-1999) for SCLC. Twice-daily radiation for SCLC was used for 21% of patients in 2006-2007 versus 8% in 1998-1999. Finally, 49% of patients with LS-SCLC received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in 2006-2007 (vs 21% in 1998-1999).
CONCLUSIONS: Although adherence to all quality indicators improved over time, brain imaging and recommended radiation doses for stage III NSCLC were used in <90% of cases. Use of full thoracic doses and PCI for LS-SCLC also requires improvement.
Stimulation of the chemosensory TRPA1 cation channel by volatile toxic substances promotes cell survival of small cell lung cancer cells.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2013; 85(3):426-38 [PubMed]
The utility of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic tumors to the lung: a retrospective examination of 1,032 cases.
Acta Cytol. 2012; 56(6):590-5 [PubMed]
METHODS: A computerized search of our laboratory informatics system was performed to identify cases from FNA of the lung and FNA of metastatic lung cancers to other sites. All of the corresponding surgical pathology reports were also reviewed. All of the cases were categorized as atypical (A), benign (B), malignant (M), nondiagnostic (ND), or suspicious (S) for data analysis purposes.
RESULTS: A total of 1,032 FNA cases were categorized as follows: 34 (3.3%) A, 142 (13.8%) B, 717 (69.5%) M, 121 (11.7%) ND, and 18 (1.7%) S. Of the 717 cases of malignant FNA, a specific tumor type was able to be rendered on cytomorphology alone or with the help of immunostains in 99% as follows: adenocarcinoma (296 cases, 41%), squamous cell carcinoma (158 cases, 22%), metastatic tumors (123 cases, 17%), small cell carcinoma (56 cases, 8%), non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) (58 cases, 8%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (15 cases, 2%), and poorly differentiated carcinoma (4 cases, 1%). Out of all NSCLC cases, 89% were able to be subclassified as either adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma. The most frequent origins of metastatic tumors to the lung were renal cell carcinoma (n = 22), melanoma (n = 17), colon (n = 15), breast (n = 14), and urothelial carcinoma (n = 10). There was also metastasis from 18 other organs with fewer than 5 cases each. There were 333 correlated histologic specimens including 191 small biopsies and 142 resection specimens. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 96 and 100%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 97%. Sampling error resulted in 8 false-negative cases on FNA.
CONCLUSIONS: FNA is both sensitive and specific in the diagnosis and subclassification of both primary and metastatic lung tumors. Eighty-nine percent of NSCLC cases were able to be further subclassified as adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma by FNA.
Total gross tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated with selective nodal irradiation for stage I to III small cell lung cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85(5):1319-24 [PubMed]
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analysis of our prospective database with stage I to III SCLC patients referred for concurrent chemo radiation therapy. Standard treatment was 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily concurrently with carboplatin-etoposide, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in case of non-progression. Only fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)-positive or pathologically proven nodal sites were included in the target volume. Total GTV consisted of post chemotherapy tumor volume and pre chemotherapy nodal volume. Survival was calculated from diagnosis (Kaplan-Meier ).
RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were included between May 2004 and June 2009. Median total GTV was 93 ± 152 cc (7.5-895 cc). Isolated elective nodal failure occurred in 2 patients (1.7%). Median follow-up was 38 months, median overall survival 20 months (95% confidence interval = 17.8-22.1 months), and 2-year survival 38.4%. In multivariate analysis, only total GTV (P=.026) and performance status (P=.016) significantly influenced survival.
CONCLUSIONS: In this series of stage I to III small cell lung cancer patients treated with FDG-PET-based selective nodal irradiation total GTV is an independent risk factor for survival.
Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013; 71(2):413-8 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHODS: We tested the aforementioned three-drug combination and avoided the toxicity in the majority of patients by administering all 3 drugs on day one. Fifty-one patients (50 evaluable) were recruited from 4 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40 and 60 % of the patients, respectively. The treatment was: cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), etoposide 120 mg/m(2) (maximum 200 mg), and paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2). The agents were administered on day one and repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
RESULTS: The median survival was 15 months (95 % CI 13.6-16.4) (mean 16 months). Forty-five (90 %) patients achieved a response: 20 (40 %) patients, a complete response and 25 (50 %), a partial response. Adverse reactions included grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12 and 2 % of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were of very low toxicity.
CONCLUSION: The 1-day, three-agent (cisplatin-etoposide-paclitaxel) treatment of small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and the toxicity is low and well-tolerated.
Phase II study of nedaplatin and irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013; 71(2):345-50 [PubMed]
METHODS: Patients with untreated ED-SCLC were treated with nedaplatin (NP) at 50 mg/m(2) and irinotecan (CPT) at 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for four cycles.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were registered. Nineteen patients were male and six female, with a median age of 64 years (50-79 years). Two patients had a performance status of 2. Nineteen of them were able to receive 4 courses of NP and CPT chemotherapy. Grade 3 or 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 8.0, 68.0, and 36.0 % of patients, respectively. Other grade 3 toxicities were SGOT, hyponatremia, fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension, febrile neutropenia, oral hemorrhage, and pneumonia. Grade 4 fatigue occurred in one patient. There was no treatment-related death. The overall response rate was 100 %. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 6.6 and 16.0 months, respectively, and the 2-year survival rate was 28 %.
CONCLUSION: NP with CPT is effective and safe for patients with ED-SCLC.
Update of research on drug resistance in small cell lung cancer chemotherapy.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13(8):3577-81 [PubMed]
Systematic review of β-elemene injection as adjunctive treatment for lung cancer.
Chin J Integr Med. 2012; 18(11):813-23 [PubMed]
METHODS: We retrieved randomized controlled clinical trials related to the use of β-elemene Injection as an adjunctive treatment for lung cancer from Chinese Biomedical (CBMweb), Chinese Medical Current Content (CMCC), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), ChinaInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID and TCMLARS. We also referred to an unpublished conference proceeding titled Clinical Use and Basic: Elemene Injection. We then divided the studies into non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) subgroups by RevMan 5.1 software.
RESULTS: A total of 21 source documents (1,467 patients) matched pre-specified criteria for determining the effectiveness and safety of β-elemene Injection as an adjunctive treatment for lung cancer. Five studies involving 285 NSCLC patients reported a higher 24-month survival rate (39.09%) with the adjunctive treatment than with chemotherapy alone (26.17%; RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.21). Four studies involving 445 patients reported that the increased probability for improved performance status for patients treated with elemene-based combinations was higher than that of patients treated with chemotherapy alone (RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.29). The results from a subgroup analysis on 12 studies involving 974 NSCLC patients and 9 studies involving 593 patients with both SCLC and NSCLC showed that the tumor control rate for NSCLC improved more in the elemene-based combinations treatment group (78.70%) than in the chemotherapy alone control group (71.31%; RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.12). The tumor response rate for NSCLC also improved more among patients treated with elemenebased combinations (50.71%) than among patients treated with chemotherapy alone (38.04%; RR, 1.34; 95%CI, 1.17 to 1.54). In addition, the main adverse reaction to β-elemene Injection was phlebitis, but usually only to a mild degree. An Egger's test showed no publication bias in our study (P=0.7030).
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of chemotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer may improve when combined with β-elemene injection as an adjunctive treatment. The combined treatment can result in an improved quality of life and prolonged survival. However, these results require confirmation by rigorously controlled trials.
The iron chelator, deferasirox, as a novel strategy for cancer treatment: oral activity against human lung tumor xenografts and molecular mechanism of action.
Mol Pharmacol. 2013; 83(1):179-90 [PubMed]
Subpopulation of small-cell lung cancer cells expressing CD133 and CD87 show resistance to chemotherapy.
Cancer Sci. 2013; 104(1):78-84 [PubMed]
Combination chemotherapy of alternating etoposide and carboplatin with weekly administration of irinotecan and cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Anticancer Res. 2012; 32(10):4473-8 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with previously untreated ED-SCLC were enrolled in the study. At least four courses of chemotherapy consisting of alternation of two drug combinations were given: alternating cycles of etoposide and carboplatin (EC) with weekly administration of irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) at 3- or 4-week intervals.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 81.8%. The median duration of survival and progression-free survival were 314 days and 144 days, respectively. Hematological toxicity was the main adverse event. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were observed in 69.2, 25.6 and 23.1% of the patients, respectively. Severe diarrhea (10.8%) was remarkable during the IP regimen.
CONCLUSION: This novel alternating chemotherapy for patients with ED-SCLC showed moderate tumor efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.
Use of endobronchial ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound to stage the mediastinum in early-stage lung cancer.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012; 10(10):1277-82 [PubMed]
Baseline quality of life and performance status as prognostic factors in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed plus carboplatin vs. etoposide plus carboplatin.
Lung Cancer. 2012; 78(3):276-81 [PubMed]
METHODS: Using data from a Phase III trial of pemetrexed-carboplatin vs. etoposide-carboplatin, the effect of the prognostic factors on OS and PFS was analyzed via Cox models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS parameters for the prognostic subgroups (defined by baseline FACT scores and ECOG PS).
RESULTS: Patients with higher baseline FACT-General (FACT-G) score (≥ median) had significantly higher OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, P<.0001) and PFS (HR=0.83, P=.032) compared with patients with lower FACT-G score (
Two microRNA panels to discriminate three subtypes of lung carcinoma in bronchial brushing specimens.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 186(11):1160-7 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVES: To identify microRNAs in bronchial brushing specimens for discriminating small cell lung cancer (SCLC) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for further differentiating squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) from adenocarcinoma (AC).
METHODS: Microarrays were used to screen 723 microRNAs in laser-captured, microdissected cancer cells from 82 snap-frozen surgical lung specimens. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was performed on 153 macrodissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) surgical lung specimens to evaluate seven microRNA candidates discovered from microarrays. Two microRNA panels were constructed on the basis of a training cohort (n = 85) and validated using an independent cohort (n = 68). The microRNA panels were applied as differentiators of SCLC from NSCLC and of SQ from AC in 207 bronchial brushing specimens.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two microRNA panels yielded high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating SCLC from NSCLC (miR-29a and miR-375; area under the curve [AUC], 0.991 and 0.982 for training and validation data set, respectively) and in differentiating SQ from AC (miR-205 and miR-34a; AUC, 0.977 and 0.982 for training and validation data set, respectively) in FFPE surgical lung specimens. Moreover, the microRNA panels accurately differentiated SCLC from NSCLC (AUC, 0.947) and SQ from AC (AUC, 0.962) in bronchial brushing specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: We found two microRNA panels that accurately discriminated between the three subtypes of lung carcinoma in bronchial brushing specimens. The identified microRNA panels may have considerable clinical value in differential diagnosis and optimizing treatment strategies based on lung cancer subtypes.
A framework for identification of actionable cancer genome dependencies in small cell lung cancer.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(42):17034-9 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
The liberated domain I of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor--a new tumour marker in small cell lung cancer.
APMIS. 2013; 121(3):189-96 [PubMed]
Landscape of somatic allelic imbalances and copy number alterations in human lung carcinoma.
Int J Cancer. 2013; 132(9):2020-31 [PubMed]
Alterations of phosphoproteins in NCI-H526 small cell lung cancer cells involved in cytotoxicity of cisplatin and titanocene Y.
Neoplasia. 2012; 14(9):813-22 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
Phase II study of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in limited-disease small cell lung cancer.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012; 70(5):645-51 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: chemotherapy-naïve, good performance status (PS 0-1), age ≤75, LD-SCLC, and adequate organ function. The patients received irinotecan 40 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1. Four cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 4 weeks. Split-course thoracic radiotherapy of once-daily 2 Gy/day commenced on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, with 26 and 24 Gy administered in the first and second cycles, respectively.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were eligible and assessable for response, toxicity, and survival. Patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female = 29/5; PS 0/1 = 18/16; median age (range) = 67 (50-73); and stage IB/IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB = 2/2/3/16/11. The overall response was 100 % (CR 8, PR 26). Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, grade 3-5 pneumonitis, diarrhea, and esophagitis occurred in 24, 38, 6, 3, and 0 %, respectively. There were 2 treatment-related deaths from pneumonitis. The median time to tumor progression was 14.3 months. The median overall survival time and the 2- and 5-year survival rates were 44.5 months, 66.7 and 46.1 %, respectively. No tumor progression was observed in patients with CR.
CONCLUSION: Irinotecan plus cisplatin with concurrent split-course thoracic radiotherapy was effective and tolerable in untreated LD-SCLC.
Support vector machines coupled with proteomics approaches for detecting biomarkers predicting chemotherapy resistance in small cell lung cancer.
Oncol Rep. 2012; 28(6):2233-8 [PubMed]
Suppression of metastases of small cell lung cancer cells in mice by a peptidic CXCR4 inhibitor TF14016.
FEBS Lett. 2012; 586(20):3639-44 [PubMed]
A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer, based on 1198 pedigrees in China.
J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7(10):1534-40 [PubMed]
METHODS: We used multiple logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors and to develop a prediction model. The pathological diagnoses in Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute were consecutively chosen as probands. All first-degree relatives of probands and their spouses were included as subjects. We divided the probands and their spouses into three subgroups according to the odds ratios (ORs), and the accuracy of lung cancer predictions for patients within the subgroups increased synchronously.
RESULTS: There were 633 proband pedigrees and 565 spouse pedigrees. Independent predictors of lung cancer included sex (OR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3), smoking history (light smoker: OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8; heavy smoker: OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.1), lung disease history (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.8-10.0), occupational exposure (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2), and number of affected individuals among first-degree relatives (n = 1: OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4; n ≥ 2: OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 0.5-41.2). The accuracy of the pretest probability increased for those with higher ORs: low-OR subgroup, 68.3%; mid-OR subgroup, 84.0%; and high-OR subgroup, 91.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our prediction rule is recommended for estimating the pretest probability of lung cancer, thereby facilitating early screening.
Prediagnostic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and lung cancer survival in the VITAL study.
J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7(10):1503-12 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/10/2013
METHODS: The VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) cohort includes Washington State residents, aged 50 to 76 years, who completed a baseline questionnaire between 2000 and 2002. Participants responded on the frequency and duration of use of individual NSAIDs in the previous 10 years. Subjects of this study were 785 members of the cohort, who were identified with incident lung cancer from baseline through 2007 through linkage to a population-based cancer registry. Participants were followed for lung cancer death through linkage to state records of death through 2009. Adjusted proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between NSAIDs and lung cancer death.
RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty-two participants (66%) died from lung cancer. Relative to nonuse, high (≥ 4 days/week and ≥ 4 years) prediagnostic use of regular-strength or low-dose aspirin (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.74-1.33 and HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.67-1.17, respectively) or total nonaspirin NSAIDs (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.79-1.83) did not reduce lung cancer death. However, high use of ibuprofen was associated with a 62% increased risk of lung cancer death (HR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01-2.58).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, prediagnostic NSAID use does not improve lung cancer survival overall. Use of ibuprofen may reduce survival from lung cancer. Our results underscore the need for further study of the mechanisms of action for individual NSAIDs with regard to cancer survival.
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
