| Cancer of the Oesophagus |
|
|
The oesophagus (US spelling: esophagus) or gullet is a long hollow muscular tube which connects the throat to the stomach. Oesophageal cancer is a disease where malignant (cancerous) cells arise in the tissues of the oesophagus. The most common symptom is difficulty in swallowing. It can also be associated with weight loss and sometimes pain or discomfort behind the breast bone or in the back - these symptoms should be checked by a doctor but not are sure signs of cancer. There are two main types of oesophageal cancer (depending on how the cells appear under the microscope); approximately half are classed as "squamous cell carcinomas" and half as "adenocarcinomas". People with frequent gastric reflux leading to Barrett's Oesophagus have an increased risk of developing oesophageal cancer.
In 2010, 8,477 people in the UK were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer (Source: Cancer Research UK)
This page shows only UK resources. For a more extensive list of resources from around the world see CancerIndex: Cancer of the Oesophagus
Menu: Cancer of the Oesophagus
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research PublicationsInformation Patients and the Public (7 links)
- Cancer of the oesophagus
NHS Choices
Consultant surgeon Sukhbir Uhbi explains who's most at risk of oesophageal cancer, the questions to ask if you're diagnosed and the treatment options. Video, 2008 - Humberside Oesophageal Support Group
Humberside Oesophageal Support Group
A support group for people with oesophageal cancer and other medical problems of the oesophagus. - Oesophageal cancer
Cancer Research UK - Oesophageal cancer (also called cancer of the oesophagus or gullet)
Macmillan Cancer Support - Oesophageal cancer (or gullet cancer) explained by an oncologist
Macmillan Cancer Support
Video: Consultant thoracic surgeon Karen Harrison-Phipps explains gullet cancer, including symptoms, scans that are used to diagnose gullet cancer (including an endoscopy), treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and possible risk factors. - Oesophageal cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief. - Oesophageal Patients Association
OPA
A charity formed in 1985 by former oesophageal cancer patients.The Association provides support and information for patients, their carers and family affected by oesophageal or gastric cancers.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (4 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Oesophageal Cancer - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Oesophageal Cancer
MeSH term: Esophageal Neoplasms
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Oesophageal Carcinoma
Patient UK
PatientUK content is peer reviewed. Content is reviewed by a team led by a Clinical Editor to reflect new or updated guidance and publications. Further info. - Oesophageal Cancer
NHS Evidence - Oesophageal cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief.
Latest Research Publications
Showing publications with corresponding authors from the UK (Source: PubMed).
Assessment of a custom-built Raman spectroscopic probe for diagnosis of early oesophageal neoplasia.
J Biomed Opt. 2012; 17(8):081421-1 [PubMed]
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust, Biophotonics Research Unit, Gloucester, Gloucestershire GL1 3NNBisphosphonates and risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer--a case control study using the General Practice Research Database (GPRD).
PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47616 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Design-A case control study comparing bisphosphonate prescribing in cases of upper GI cancer from 1995 to 2007 using UK primary care electronic health records (GPRD). Main Outcome Measure-Relative Risk (approximated to Odds Ratio for rare events) for oesophageal and gastric cancer development in bisphosphonate users compared to non-users. The odds of being a case of oesophageal cancer, adjusted for smoking status, were significantly increased in women who had had one or more bisphosphonate prescriptions, odds ratio 1.54 (95% CI 1.27-1.88) compared to non-users. There was no significant effect on gastric cancer in women, odds ratio adjusted for smoking status, 1.06 (95% CI 0.83-1.37) and also no apparent risk in men for either oesophageal or gastric cancer, odds ratio adjusted for smoking status 0.78 (95%CI 0.56-1.09) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.55-1.36) respectively. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: Our results support a small but significant increased risk of oesophageal cancer in women prescribed bisphosphonates and is based on the largest number of exposed cases to date in the UK.
Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, LondonHealth benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus.
Gastroenterology. 2013; 144(1):62-73.e6 [PubMed]
METHODS: We used microsimulation modeling of a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old men in the United Kingdom with histories of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, assuming the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus to be 8%. Participants were invited to undergo screening by endoscopy or Cytosponge (invitation acceptance rates of 23% and 45%, respectively), and outcomes were compared with those from men who underwent no screening. We estimated the number of incident esophageal adenocarcinoma cases prevented and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the different strategies. Patients found to have high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer received endotherapy. Model inputs included data on disease progression, test accuracy, post-treatment status, and surveillance protocols. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per year. Supplementary and sensitivity analyses comprised esophagectomy management of high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer, screening by ultrathin nasal endoscopy, and different assumptions of uptake of screening invitations for either strategy.
RESULTS: We estimated that compared with no screening, Cytosponge screening followed by treatment of patients with dysplasia or intramucosal cancer costs an additional $240 (95% credible interval, $196-$320) per screening participant and results in a mean gain of 0.015 (95% credible interval, -0.001 to 0.029) QALYs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $15.7 thousand (K) per QALY. The respective values for endoscopy were $299 ($261-$367), 0.013 (0.003-0.023) QALYs, and $22.2K. Screening by the Cytosponge followed by treatment of patients with dysplasia or intramucosal cancer would reduce the number of cases of incident symptomatic esophageal adenocarcinoma by 19%, compared with 17% for screening by endoscopy, although this greater benefit for Cytosponge depends on more patients accepting screening by Cytosponge compared with screening by endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: In a microsimulation model, screening 50-year-old men with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease by Cytosponge is cost effective and would reduce mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with no screening.
Medical Research Council, Biostatistics Unit, CambridgePredictive value of symptoms and demographics in diagnosing malignancy or peptic stricture.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(32):4357-62 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHODS: A prospective case-control study of 2000 consecutive referrals (1031 female, age range: 17-103 years) to a rapid access service for dysphagia, based in a teaching hospital within the United Kingdom, over 7 years. The service consists of a nurse-led telephone triage followed by investigation (barium swallow or gastroscopy), if appropriate, within 2 wk. Logistic regression analysis of demographic and clinical variables was performed. This includes age, sex, duration of dysphagia, whether to liquids or solids, and whether there are associated features (reflux, odynophagia, weight loss, regurgitation). We determined odds ratio (OR) for these variables for the diagnoses of malignancy and peptic stricture. We determined the value of the Edinburgh Dysphagia Score (EDS) in predicting cancer in our cohort. Multivariate logistic regression was performed and P < 0.05 considered significant. The local ethics committee confirmed ethics approval was not required (audit).
RESULTS: The commonest diagnosis is gastro-esophageal reflux disease (41.3%). Malignancy (11.0%) and peptic stricture (10.0%) were also relatively common. Malignancies were diagnosed by histology (97%) or on radiological criteria, either sequential barium swallows showing progression of disease or unequivocal evidence of malignancy on computed tomography. The majority of malignancies were esophago-gastric in origin but ear, nose and throat tumors, pancreatic cancer and extrinsic compression from lung or mediastinal metastatic cancer were also found. Malignancy was statistically more frequent in older patients (aged >73 years, OR 1.1-3.3, age < 60 years 6.5%, 60-73 years 11.2%, > 73 years 11.8%, P < 0.05), males (OR 2.2-4.8, males 14.5%, females 5.6%, P < 0.0005), short duration of dysphagia (≤ 8 wk, OR 4.5-20.7, 16.6%, 8-26 wk 14.5%, > 26 wk 2.5%, P < 0.0005), progressive symptoms (OR 1.3-2.6: progressive 14.8%, intermittent 9.3%, P < 0.001), with weight loss of ≥ 2 kg (OR 2.5-5.1, weight loss 22.1%, without weight loss 6.4%, P < 0.0005) and without reflux (OR 1.2-2.5, reflux 7.2%, no reflux 15.5%, P < 0.0005). The likelihood of malignancy was greater in those who described true dysphagia (food or drink sticking within 5 s of swallowing than those who did not (15.1% vs 5.2% respectively, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the EDS were 98.4%, 9.3%, 11.8% and 98.0% respectively. Three patients with an EDS of 3 (high risk EDS ≥ 3.5) had malignancy. Unlike the original validation cohort, there was no difference in likelihood of malignancy based on level of dysphagia (pharyngeal level dysphagia 11.9% vs mid sternal or lower sternal dysphagia 12.4%). Peptic stricture was statistically more frequent in those with longer duration of symptoms (> 6 mo, OR 1.2-2.9, ≤ 8 wk 9.8%, 8-26 wk 10.6%, > 26 wk 15.7%, P < 0.05) and over 60 s (OR 1.2-3.0, age < 60 years 6.2%, 60-73 years 10.2%, > 73 years 10.6%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Malignancy and peptic stricture are frequent findings in those referred with dysphagia. The predictive value for associated features could help determine need for fast track investigation whilst reducing service pressures.
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3LJDistinct genetic association at the PLCE1 locus with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the South African population.
Carcinogenesis. 2012; 33(11):2155-61 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/11/2013
Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, King's Health Partners, Guy's Hospital, LondonThoracoscopic-assisted four-phase esophagectomy with four-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: case report and description of a new technique.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012; 22(7):701-4 [PubMed]
The Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, GuildfordNatural history of Barrett's esophagus.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(27):3483-91 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/11/2013
Department of Surgery, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, Tyne and Wear NE29 8NHPopulation-based study reveals new risk-stratification biomarker panel for Barrett's esophagus.
Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(4):927-35.e3 [PubMed]
METHODS: We analyzed data from a nested case-control study performed using the population-based Northern Ireland BE Register (1993-2005). Cases who progressed to EAC (n = 89) or high-grade dysplasia ≥ 6 months after diagnosis with BE were matched to controls (nonprogressors, n = 291), for age, sex, and year of BE diagnosis. Established biomarkers (abnormal DNA content, p53, and cyclin A expression) and new biomarkers (levels of sialyl Lewis(a), Lewis(x), and Aspergillus oryzae lectin [AOL] and binding of wheat germ agglutinin) were assessed in paraffin-embedded tissue samples from patients with a first diagnosis of BE. Conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to assess odds of progression for patients with dysplastic and nondysplastic BE, based on biomarker status.
RESULTS: Low-grade dysplasia and all biomarkers tested, other than Lewis(x), were associated with risk of EAC or high-grade dysplasia. In backward selection, a panel comprising low-grade dysplasia, abnormal DNA ploidy, and AOL most accurately identified progressors and nonprogressors. The adjusted odds ratio for progression of patients with BE with low-grade dysplasia was 3.74 (95% confidence interval, 2.43-5.79) for each additional biomarker and the risk increased by 2.99 for each additional factor (95% confidence interval, 1.72-5.20) in patients without dysplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade dysplasia, abnormal DNA ploidy, and AOL can be used to identify patients with BE most likely to develop EAC or high-grade dysplasia.
Medical Research Council Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, CambridgeEvidence for a functional role of epigenetically regulated midcluster HOXB genes in the development of Barrett esophagus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(23):9077-82 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/11/2013
Medical Research Council Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison Medical Research Council Research Centre, CB2 0XZ CambridgeCaspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 and tumour regression in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(16):1915-20 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/11/2013
METHODS: Formalin-fixed human gastro-oesophageal cancers were constructed into tissue microarrays. The first set consisted of 122 gastric/gastro-oesophageal cancer cases not exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the second set consisted of 97 gastric/gastro-oesophageal cancer cases exposed to pre-operative platinum-based chemotherapy. Expression of CK-18 and caspase-cleaved CK-18 was investigated using immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: CK18 was commonly expressed in gastro-oesophageal tumours (92.6%). Fifty-six point seven percent of tumours previously exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were positive for caspase-cleaved CK-18 expression compared to only 24.6% of tumours not previously exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.009). In patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 expression correlated with favourable TRG response (TRG 1, 2 or 3, P = 0.043).
CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date of CK-18 and caspase-cleaved CK-18 expression in gastro-oesophageal tumours. We provide the first evidence that caspase-cleaved CK-18 predicts tumour regression with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Academic Unit of Oncology, School of Molecular Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PBRisk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16(6):1083-95 [PubMed]
METHODS: Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal resections with an oesophageal anastomosis between 2005 and 2010 were reviewed and formed the development dataset with resections performed in 2011 forming a prospective validation dataset. The association between post-operative C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count (WCC) and albumin levels with anastomotic leak (AL) or major complication including death using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification were analysed by receiver operating characteristic curves. After multivariate analysis, from the development dataset, these factors were combined to create a novel score which was subsequently tested on the validation dataset.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients were assessed to develop the score. Sixty-three patients (25%) developed a major complication, and there were seven (2.7%) in-patient deaths. Twenty-six (10%) patients were diagnosed with AL at median post-operative day 7 (range: 5-15). CRP (p = 0.002), WCC (p < 0.0001) and albumin (p = 0.001) were predictors of AL. Combining these markers improved prediction of AL (NUn score > 10: sensitivity 95%, specificity 49%, diagnostic accuracy 0.801 (95% confidence interval: 0.692-0.909, p < 0.0001)). The validation dataset confirmed these findings (NUn score > 10: sensitivity 100%, specificity 57%, diagnostic accuracy 0.879 (95% CI 0.763-0.994, p = 0.014)) and a major complication or death (NUn > 10: sensitivity 89%, specificity 63%, diagnostic accuracy 0.856 (95% CI 0.709-1, p = 0.001)).
CONCLUSIONS: Blood-borne markers of the systemic inflammatory response are predictors of AL and major complications after oesophageal resection. When combined they may categorise a patient's risk of developing a serious complication with higher sensitivity and specificity.
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YDEndoscopic ultrasound-guided elastography in the nodal staging of oesophageal cancer.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(9):889-95 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/11/2013
METHODS: This was a single tertiary centre study assessing 50 patients with established oesophago-gastric cancer undergoing EUS-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of lymph nodes between July 2007 and July 2009. EUS-guided elastography of lymph nodes was performed before EUS-FNAB. Standard EUS characteristics were also described. Cytological determination of whether a lymph node was malignant or benign was used as the gold standard for this study. Comparisons of elastography and standard EUS characteristics were made between the cytologically benign and malignant nodes. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes in oesophageal cancers.
RESULTS: EUS elastography and FNAB were performed on 53 lymph nodes. Cytological malignancy was found in 23 nodes, one was indeterminate, one was found to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor and 25 of the nodes were negative for malignancy. On 3 occasions insufficient material was obtained for analysis. The area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve for elastography strain ratio was 0.87 (P < 0.0001). Elastography strain ratio had a sensitivity 83%, specificity 96%, positive predictive value 95%, and negative predictive value 86% for distinguishing between malignant and benign nodes. The overall accuracy of elastography strain ratio was 90%. Elastography was more sensitive and specific in determining malignant nodal disease than standard EUS criteria.
CONCLUSION: EUS elastography is a promising modality that may complement standard EUS and help guide EUS-FNAB during staging of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.
Department of Gastroenterology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert FK5 4WRProtection from intracellular oxidative stress by cytoglobin in normal and cancerous oesophageal cells.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e30587 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/11/2013
School of Biosciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, BirminghamToenail trace element status and risk of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study.
Int J Cancer. 2012; 131(8):1882-91 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/10/2013
Cancer Epidemiology and Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences Block B, BelfastShort-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
Ann Surg. 2012; 255(2):197-203 [PubMed]
BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous studies have demonstrated the safety and possible advantages of MIE in selected cohorts of patients. The increasing use of MIE is not coupled with conclusive evidence of its benefits over "open" esophagectomy, especially in the absence of randomized trials.
METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics data were analyzed from April 2005 to March 2010. This is a routinely collected database of all English National Health Service Trusts. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures, 4th revision (OPCS-4), procedure codes were used to identify index resections and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), diagnostic codes were used to ascertain comorbidity status and complications. Thirty-day in-hospital mortality, medical complications, and surgical reinterventions were analyzed. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted regression analyses were undertaken.
RESULTS: Seven thousand five hundred and two esophagectomies were undertaken; of these, 1155 (15.4%) were MIE. In 2009-2010, 24.7% of resections were MIE. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (4.3% vs 4.0%; P = 0.605) and overall medical morbidity (38.0% vs 39.2%; P = 0.457) rates between open and MIE groups, respectively. A higher reintervention rate was associated with the MIE group than with the open group (21% vs 17.6%, P = 0.006; odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.38; P = 0.040).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasingly performed in the United Kingdom. Although the study confirmed the safety of MIE in a population-based national data, there are no significant benefits demonstrated in mortality and overall morbidity. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with higher reintervention rate. Further evidence is needed to establish the long-term survival of MIE.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College LondonThe impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38(2):157-65 [PubMed]
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Scottish Audit of Gastric and Oesophageal Cancer (SAGOC), a prospective population-based audit of all oesophageal and gastric cancers in Scotland between 1997 and 1999 with a minimum of five-year follow up. Analysis focused on the three commonest approaches (Ivor Lewis n = 140, transhiatal n = 68, left thoraco-laparotomy n = 142) for oesophageal cancer.
RESULTS: Operative approach had no significant impact on post-operative morbidity, mortality, overall margin involvement and survival. Transhiatal approach resulted in significantly more circumferential margin involvement (p = 0.019), and the presence of circumferential margin involvement significantly reduced five-year survival (median survival 13 months) compared to no margin involvement (median survival 25 months, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Surgical approach for oesophageal cancer had no significant effect on morbidity, post-operative mortality and five-year survival. Non-selective use of the transhiatal approach is associated with a significantly greater circumferential margin involvement, with positive circumferential margin impacting adversely on 5-year survival.
Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, ScotlandThe insertion of self expanding metal stents with flexible bronchoscopy under sedation for malignant tracheobronchial stenosis: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Arch Bronconeumol. 2012; 48(2):43-8 [PubMed]
METHODS: Medical notes were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent SEMS insertion between 1999 and 2009.
RESULTS: A data analysis of 68 patients who had Ultraflex™ SEMS inserted under sedation was completed. Thirty three males and 35 females with a mean age of 67.9 years (range 35-94) presented with features including dyspnea/respiratory distress (39 patients), stridor (16 patients) and hemoptysis/dyspnea (13 patients). Etiology of stenosis included lung cancer (46 patients) esophageal cancer (14 patients) and other malignancies (8 patients). Mean dose of midazolam administered was 5mg (range 0-10mg). The trachea was the most common site of stent insertion followed by the right and left main bronchus, respectively. Adjuvant laser therapy was applied at some stage in 31% of all cases, and chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was administered to at least 64% of patients with malignant disease. Hemoptysis and stent migration were the most frequent complications (5 and 4 patients, respectively). The mean survival time of stented non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was 214 days (range 5-1233) and that of esophageal malignancy was 70 days (range 12-249). Mean pack-year history of individuals with lung cancer requiring stent insertion was 37 (range 2-100).
CONCLUSION: Ultraflex stents offer a safe and effective therapy for patients who are inoperable or unresectable that otherwise would have no alternative therapy. It has an immediate beneficial effect upon patients, not only through symptom relief but, in some, through prolongation of life. Survival data is no worse than other studies using different varieties of stents and insertion techniques indicating its longer-term efficacy. Moreover, this report highlights the feasibility of performing this procedure successfully in a respiratory unit, without the need for general anesthesia.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Northern General Hospital, SheffieldAssociation of dietary fat intakes with risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study.
Int J Cancer. 2012; 131(6):1376-87 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
Cancer Epidemiology Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern IrelandLymph node metastasis in early esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Ann Surg. 2011; 254(5):731-6; discussion 736-7 [PubMed]
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy is now being proposed as a viable treatment for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. If such treatments are appropriate, then the risk of LNM must be shown to be low in these tumors.
METHODS: One hundred nineteen consecutive patients underwent radical esophagectomy alone for treatment of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia. The resection specimens were analyzed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist and the presence of LNM and the depth of tumor invasion were recorded. Depth of invasion was classified as either confined to the mucosa, the first third of the submucosa, the middle third of the submucosa, or the final third of the submucosa.
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients had high-grade dysplasia or tumors confined to the mucosa with no evidence of LNM (0/54, 0%), 65 patients had tumor invading the submucosa with 8 patients having LNM (8/65, 12%). Subclassification of submucosal invasion showed that 5 of 22 "first third of the submucosa" tumors had LNM (23%), 1 of 24 "middle third of the submucosa" tumors had LNM (4%), and 2 of 19 "final third of the submucosa" tumors had LNM (11%).
CONCLUSION: Invasion of the submucosa is associated with significant risk of LNM. Patients with submucosal invasion are not suitable for endoscopic treatment and surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for patients with submucosal adenocarcinoma who are fit to undergo the procedure.
Northern Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon TyneRisk factors for neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.
World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(32):3672-83 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Lane, Wigan, Greater Manchester WN12NNNonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011; 10(3):165-70 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were identified. Fifty-one patients had CRT, 17 had radiotherapy (RT). Fifty-eight received IC before RT. IC consisted of 4 cycles of platinum and fluoropyrimidines followed by CRT 54 Gy with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine. Response to IC was assessed at 3 months and response to CRT at 3 months. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) are reported.
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were men and 14 were women, with median age 72 years (range, 42-87 years). There were 29 stage II, 33 stage III, 4 stage IVa, and 2 stage IVb tumors. The response 3 months after completion of treatment was 39.6%. No grade 4 toxicity was reported, but 10/58 patients had grade 3 toxicity from IC. The median TTP and OS from RT for the entire cohort was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-18) and 16 months (95% CI, 5-27), respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates from diagnosis were 73% and 47%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in TTP or OS in patients who responded to IC compared with those who did not (median TTP 11 vs. 12 months, respectively; P = .8; median OS 15 vs. 14 months, respectively; P = .8).
CONCLUSION: The outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after CRT is comparable to unselected surgical series. Response to IC is not always an indicator of eventual outcome.
Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SuttonThe role of Pea3 group transcription factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Am J Pathol. 2011; 179(2):992-1003 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
Center for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, BelfastMolecular basis for maize as a risk factor for esophageal cancer in a South African population via a prostaglandin E2 positive feedback mechanism.
Nutr Cancer. 2011; 63(5):714-21 [PubMed]
Cranfield Health, Cranfield University, Cranfield, BedfordshireDefining the endoscopic appearances of tylosis using conventional and narrow-band imaging: a case series.
Endoscopy. 2011; 43(8):727-30 [PubMed]
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, LiverpoolDietary fat and meat intakes and risk of reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Int J Cancer. 2011; 129(6):1493-502 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
Cancer Epidemiology Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern IrelandMicroRNA prognostic signature for nodal metastases and survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91(5):1523-30 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
METHODS: The miRNA analysis was performed using a custom Affymetrix microarray with probes for 462 known human, 2,102 predicted human, 357 mouse, and 238 rat miRNAs. Expression of miRNA was evaluated in 45 primary tumors, and the association of miRNA expression with patient survival and lymph node metastasis was assessed. The prognostic impact of identified unique miRNAs was verified with quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Our data indicate that the expression of individual human miRNA species is significantly associated with postresection patient survival. Using data from five unique miRNAs, we were further able to generate a combined miRNA expression signature that is associated with patient survival (p=0.005; hazard ratio 3.6) independent of node involvement and overall stage. The expression of three miRNAs (miR-99b and miR-199a_3p and _5p) was also associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest miRNA expression profiling could provide prognostic utility in staging esophagus cancer patients and treatment planning with endoscopic and neoadjuvant therapies. The alterations of specific miRNAs may further elucidate steps in the metastatic pathway and allow for development of targeted therapy.
University College London, Cancer Institute, LondonBiomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: predictors of progression and prognosis.
World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(45):5669-81 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
MRC Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Box 197/ Hills Road, Cambridge, CB20XZMetabolic profiling detects field effects in nondysplastic tissue from esophageal cancer patients.
Cancer Res. 2010; 70(22):9129-36 [PubMed]
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, LondonExposure to oral bisphosphonates and risk of esophageal cancer.
JAMA. 2010; 304(6):657-63 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/09/2013
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between bisphosphonate use and esophageal cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted from the UK General Practice Research Database to compare the incidence of esophageal and gastric cancer in a cohort of patients treated with oral bisphosphonates between January 1996 and December 2006 with incidence in a control cohort. Cancers were identified from relevant Read/Oxford Medical Information System codes in the patient's clinical files. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in bisphosphonate users compared with nonusers, with adjustment for potential confounders.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hazard ratio for the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in the bisphosphonate users compared with the bisphosphonate nonusers.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 4.5 and 4.4 years in the bisphosphonate and control cohorts, respectively. Excluding patients with less than 6 months' follow-up, there were 41 826 members in each cohort (81% women; mean age, 70.0 (SD, 11.4) years). One hundred sixteen esophageal or gastric cancers (79 esophageal) occurred in the bisphosphonate cohort and 115 (72 esophageal) in the control cohort. The incidence of esophageal and gastric cancer combined was 0.7 per 1000 person-years of risk in both the bisphosphonate and control cohorts; the incidence of esophageal cancer alone in the bisphosphonate and control cohorts was 0.48 and 0.44 per 1000 person-years of risk, respectively. There was no difference in risk of esophageal and gastric cancer combined between the cohorts for any bisphosphonate use (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.25]) or risk of esophageal cancer only (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.49]). There also was no difference in risk of esophageal or gastric cancer by duration of bisphosphonate intake.
CONCLUSION: Among patients in the UK General Practice Research Database, the use of oral bisphosphonates was not significantly associated with incident esophageal or gastric cancer.
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Rd, Belfast BT12 6BJOpen versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.
Ann Surg. 2010; 252(2):292-8 [PubMed]
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Around 7400 people are affected each year in the United Kingdom. Prognosis following esophageal resection is, however, poor. Even after "curative" surgery, 5-year survival rates do not exceed 25%. The minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy has attracted attention as a potentially less invasive alternative to conventional surgery.
METHODS: Data on patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were extracted from a national administrative database. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, 30-day in-hospital mortality, 30-day total (ie, in and out of hospital) mortality, 365-day total mortality, 28-day emergency readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify the effect of minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE) on the outcomes after adjustment for age, gender, socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbidity.
RESULTS: A total of 18,673 esophagectomies were performed over the 12-year study period. The use of minimal access surgery increased exponentially over time (from 0.6% in 1996/1997 to 16.0% in 2007/2008). There was a suggestion that patients undergoing MIE had better 1-year survival rates than patients receiving open esophagectomy (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46-1.01, P = 0.058).
CONCLUSION: The uptake of MIE in England is increasing exponentially. With the possible exception of 1-year survival, patients selected for MIE demonstrated similar mortality and length of stay outcomes when compared with those undergoing conventional surgery. These results need to be confirmed in large-scale randomized controlled trials.
Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College, Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, LondonSee publications from around the world in CancerIndex: Cancer of the Oesophagus
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
