| Cervical Cancer |
|
|
Cervical cancer is a common type of malignancy accounting for about 6% of all cancers found in women. It is a disease in which cancerous cells develop in the uterine cervix (this is the connecting passage between the uterus and vagina). The human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the principal cause of most cervical cancers. The peak incidence of cervical cancer occurs between the ages of 40 to 55. It is rare before the age of 35, however the incidence of cervical cancer in younger women rose dramatically during the two decades after 1960. Regular Pap smear tests may detect abnormal changes in the cervical tissues, before cancer develops. Symptoms of cervical cancer may include vaginal bleeding after intercourse or bleeding between periods. However, in the early stages of the disease there are often no obvious signs or symptoms, so regular smear tests are important.
In the UK about 2,800 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year. (Source: Cancer Research UK)
This page shows only UK resources. For a more extensive list of resources from around the world see CancerIndex: Cervical Cancer
Menu: Cervical Cancer
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research PublicationsInformation Patients and the Public (12 links)
- Cervical Cancer
Cancer Research UK
CancerHelp information is examined by both expert and lay reviewers. Content is reviewed every 12 to 18 months. Further info. - Cervical Cancer
Macmillan Cancer Support
Content is developed by a team of information development nurses and content editors, and reviewed by health professionals. Further info. - Cervical cancer
NHS Choices
NHS Choices information is quality assured by experts and content is reviewed at least every 2 years. Further info. - Cervical cancer
BBC
Article covering Cervical cancer, causes, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. - Cervical Cancer
healthtalkonline.org
Detailed information, including snippets from interviews with 25 women, who share their experiences on a broad range of topics related to cervical cancer and treatment and side effects. - Cervical Cancer
Patient UK
Detailed article covering many aspects of cervical cancer, causes, tests, diagnosis, screening, and treatments. Includes advertising. - Cervical Cancer - Module 1: Anatomy of the Cervix
NHS / ASKVisualScience
An animated video about the anatomy of the cervix - part of a series of videos about cervical cancer aimed at general practitioners and their patients. - Cervical Cancer - Module 2: HPV replication and cell cycle dysfunction
NHS / ASKVisualScience
An animated video about the HPV virus can disrupt the cell cycle - part of a series of videos about cervical cancer aimed at general practitioners and their patients. - Cervical Cancer - Module 3: Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
NHS / ASKVisualScience
An animated video about how cancer can develop in the cervix - part of a series of videos about cervical cancer aimed at general practitioners and their patients. - Cervical Cancer - Module 4: Invasive Carcinoma
NHS / ASKVisualScience - Cervical cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief. - Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust
Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust
A UK charity dedicated to women and their families affected by cervical cancer and cervical abnormalities. The Trust provides information, support, and promotes awareness of the importance of cervical screening.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (5 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Cervical Cancer - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Cervical Cancer
MeSH term: Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Cervical Carcinoma
Patient UK
PatientUK content is peer reviewed. Content is reviewed by a team led by a Clinical Editor to reflect new or updated guidance and publications. Further info. - Cervical Cancer
NHS Evidence
Regularly updated and reviewed. Further info. - British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology
BSCCP
The Society, founded in 1972, is a multi-disciplinary forum for the discussion of all matters pertaining to the prevention of cancer of the cervix. - Cervical cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief.
Latest Research Publications
Showing publications with corresponding authors from the UK (Source: PubMed).
Poor prognosis associated with human papillomavirus α7 genotypes in cervical carcinoma cannot be explained by intrinsic radiosensitivity.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85(5):e223-9 [PubMed]
METHODS AND MATERIALS: HPV genotyping was performed on cervix biopsies by polymerase chain reaction using SPF-10 broad-spectrum primers, followed by deoxyribonucleic acid enzyme immunoassay and genotyping by reverse hybridization line probe assay (LiPA25) (version 1) (n=202). PapilloCheck and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were used to genotype cervix cancer cell lines (n=16). Local progression-free survival after radiation therapy alone was assessed using log-rank and Cox proportionate hazard analyses. Intrinsic radiosensitivity was measured as surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) using clonogenic assays.
RESULTS: Of the 202 tumors, 107 (53.0%) were positive for HPV16, 29 (14.4%) for HPV18, 9 (4.5%) for HPV45, 23 (11.4%) for other HPV genotypes, and 22 (10.9%) were negative; 11 (5.5%) contained multiple genotypes, and 1 tumor was HPV X (0.5%). In 148 patients with outcome data, those with HPVα9-positive tumors had better local progression-free survival compared with α7 patients in univariate (P<.004) and multivariate (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.76, P=.021) analyses. There was no difference in the median SF2 of α9 and α7 cervical tumors (n=63). In the cell lines, 9 were α7 and 4 α9 positive and 3 negative. There was no difference in SF2 between α9 and α7 cell lines (n=14).
CONCLUSION: The reduced radioresponsiveness of α7 cervical tumors is not related to intrinsic radiosensitivity.
Translational Radiobiology Group, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, ManchesterNew technologies and procedures for cervical cancer screening.
Vaccine. 2012; 30 Suppl 5:F107-16 [PubMed]
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, LondonAccess to cancer screening in people with learning disabilities in the UK: cohort study in the health improvement network, a primary care research database.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e43841 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
DESIGN: Four cohort studies comparing people with and without learning disability, within the recommended age ranges for cancer screening in the UK. We used Poisson regression to determine relative incidence rates of cancer screening.
SETTING: The Health Improvement Network, a UK primary care database with over 450 General practices.
PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with a recorded diagnosis of learning disability including general diagnostic terms, specific syndromes, chromosomal abnormalities and autism in their General Practitioner computerised notes. For each type of cancer screening, a comparison cohort of up to six people without learning disability was selected for each person with a learning disability, using stratified sampling on age within GP practice.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate ratios for receiving 1) a cervical smear test, 2) a mammogram, 3) a faecal occult blood test and 4) a prostate specific antigen test.
RESULTS: Relative rates of screening for all four cancers were significantly lower for people with learning disability. The adjusted incidence rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) were Cervical smears: Number eligible with learning disability = 6,254; IRR = 0.54 (0.52-0.56). Mammograms: Number eligible with learning disability = 2,956; IRR = 0.76 (0.72-0.81); Prostate Specific Antigen: Number eligible = 3,520; IRR = 0.87 (0.80-0.96) and Faecal Occult Blood Number eligible = 6,566; 0.86 (0.78-0.94). Differences in screening rates were less pronounced in more socially deprived areas. Disparities in cervical screening rates narrowed over time, but were 45% lower in 2008/9, those for breast cancer screening appeared to widen and were 35% lower in 2009.
CONCLUSION: Despite recent incentives, people with learning disability in the UK are significantly less likely to receive screening tests for cancer that those without learning disability. Other methods for reducing inequalities in access to cancer screening should be considered.
Mental Health Sciences Unit, University College London, LondonAKT1 loss correlates with episomal HPV16 in vulval intraepithelial neoplasia.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38608 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
Centre for Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, LondonManagement of microinvasive cervical cancer: a British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology audit.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012; 16(4):403-8 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the current management and follow-up of women with stage IA cervical cancer, according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, within the United Kingdom.
DESIGN/SETTING: This study is a multicenter national audit of a clinical practice in the United Kingdom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent and returned electronically to all lead colposcopists in the United Kingdom on the management and follow-up of women with stage IA cervical cancer according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. The study was approved by the British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.
RESULTS: Of the 210 lead colposcopists, 110 (52%) responded. All reported that women with stage IA cervical cancer are discussed at a gynecologic multidisciplinary team meeting. Women who managed conservatively with their cervix in situ are followed up for at least 5 years. There is a wide variation in clinical management of cases with lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) and depth of invasion greater than 3 mm (stage IA2).
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern and practice of follow-up for stage IA cervical cancer is highly variable. The development of national guidance should be considered.
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, ScotlandA prospective single-center study of sentinel lymph node detection in cervical carcinoma: is there a place in clinical practice?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012; 22(6):1044-9 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sentinel lymph node detection was performed prospectively over a 6-year period in 86 women undergoing surgery for cervical carcinoma by the combined method (Tc-99m and methylene blue dye). Further ultrastaging was performed on a subgroup of 26 patients who had benign SLNs on initial routine histological examination.
RESULTS: The SLN was detected in 84 (97.7%) of 86 women by the combined method. Blue dye uptake was not seen in 8 women (90.7%). Sentinel lymph nodes were detected bilaterally in 63 women (73.3%), and the external iliac region was the most common anatomic location (48.8%). The median SLN count was 3 nodes (range, 1-7). Of the 84 women with sentinel node detection, 65 also underwent bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, and in none of these cases was a benign SLN associated with a malignant non-SLN (100% negative predictive value). The median non-SLN count for all patients was 19 nodes (range, 8-35). Eighteen patients underwent removal of the SLN without bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Nine women (10.5%) had positive lymph nodes on final histology. One patient had bulky pelvic nodes on preoperative imaging and underwent removal of the negative bulky malignant lymph nodes and a benign SLN on the contralateral side. This latter case confirms the unreliability of the SLN method with bulky nodes. The remaining 8 patients had positive SLNs with negative nonsentinel lymph nodes. Fifty-nine SLNs from 26 patients, which were benign on initial routine histology, underwent ultrastaging, but no further disease was identified. Four patients (5%) relapsed after a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 8-80 months).
CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node detection is an accurate and safe method in the assessment of nodal status in early cervical carcinoma.
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Maidstone Hospital, Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone, KentCervical screening within HIV care: findings from an HIV-positive cohort in Ukraine.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34706 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHODS: Poisson regression models were fitted to data from 1120 women enrolled at three sites of the Ukraine Cohort Study of HIV-infected Childbearing Women to investigate factors associated with receiving cervical screening as part of HIV care. All women had been diagnosed as HIV-positive before or during their most recent pregnancy. Prevalence of cervical abnormalities (high/low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) among women who had been screened was estimated, and associated factors explored.
RESULTS: Overall, 30% (337/1120) of women had received a cervical screening test as part of HIV care at study enrolment (median 10 months postpartum), a third (115/334) of whom had been tested >12 months previously. In adjusted analyses, women diagnosed as HIV-positive during (vs before) their most recent pregnancy were significantly less likely to have a screening test reported, on adjusting for other potential risk factors (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.75 p<0.01 for 1(st)/2(nd) trimester diagnosis and APR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63 p<0.01 for 3(rd) trimester/intrapartum diagnosis). Among those with a cervical screening result reported at any time (including follow-up), 21% (68/325) had a finding of cervical abnormality. In adjusted analyses, Herpes simplex virus 2 seropositivity and a recent diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were associated with an increased risk of abnormal cervical cytology (APR 1.83 95% CI 1.07-3.11 and APR 3.49 95% CI 2.11-5.76 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In this high risk population, cervical screening coverage as part of HIV care was low and could be improved by an organised cervical screening programme for HIV-positive women. Bacterial vaginosis testing and treatment may reduce vulnerability to cervical abnormalities.
MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, LondonReconstruction of human papillomavirus type 16-mediated early-stage neoplasia implicates E6/E7 deregulation and the loss of contact inhibition in neoplastic progression.
J Virol. 2012; 86(11):6358-64 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
Division of Virology, National Institute for Medical Research, LondonCervical screening in England: the past, present, and future.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2012; 120(2):87-96 [PubMed]
School of Cancer and Enabling Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, ManchesterDouble cervical ostia after large loop excision of transformation zone.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012; 16(3):330-2 [PubMed]
CASE: Large loop excision of the transformation zone was performed on a young woman for a severely dyskaryotic cervical smear and colposcopic impression of high-grade abnormality. At her 6-month follow-up, double cervical ostium was seen resulting from cervical septum formation. This was surgically divided to enable a single cervical ostium for future smear taking and follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This case report is to make clinicians aware of a rare complication such as double cervical ostium after LLETZ and its management.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Scunthorpe General Hospital, ScunthorpeSeasonality in the incidence of cervical carcinoma in teenagers and young adults in Northern England, 1968-2005.
Chronobiol Int. 2011; 28(9):819-24 [PubMed]
Institute of Health and Society , Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, EnglandCervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women: an economic evaluation in a middle-income country.
Int J Cancer. 2012; 131(2):E96-104 [PubMed]
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, LondonAn unusual presentation of Wegener disease of the cervix: presenting as cervical cancer.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011; 15(4):328-30 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: : This is a case report.
RESULT: : We describe the unusual presentation of Wegener granulomatosis involving the uterine cervix, presenting as cervical cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: : A review of previously published cases of Wegener granulomatosis involving the uterine cervix is presented.We report the first case of Wegener granulomatosis involving the cervix without antecedent diagnosis or treatment of Wegener granuloma in any other organ.
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, SurreyHuman Papillomavirus genotype testing combined with cytology as a 'test of cure' post treatment: the importance of a persistent viral infection.
J Clin Virol. 2011; 52(2):88-92 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of the PapilloCheck(®) genotyping assay for predicting disease recurrence in a test of cure setting.
STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-eight women (19-52 years) treated for CIN2+ by large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) were evaluated with samples taken before and 6 months after treatment for HPV testing. Cytology and histology were available from recruitment until 24 months post treatment.
RESULTS: Recurrent disease was evident in 4% of patients with 2 cases low-grade and 2 cases of high-grade disease. In women with no disease recurrence, 40% (95% CI 30.42-51.05%) were high risk (HR) HPV negative post LLETZ. Both cases with high-grade disease had persistent HPV16 infection. Genotyping before and after treatment revealed 83% (95% CI 75.74-88.78%) of total viral infections were cleared and 17% (95% CI 11.22-24.26) viral infections persisted. Post treatment, combined cytology and HPV test results predicted CIN2+ with 100% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, 100% NPV and 20% PPV and measuring viral persistence marginally increased specificity and PPV.
CONCLUSION: Post treatment, cytology combined with a single HR HPV test has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting disease recurrence. HPV genotyping before and after LLETZ identifies persistent viral infections and could help refine patient management.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XNSmoking and passive smoking in cervical cancer risk: pooled analysis of couples from the IARC multicentric case-control studies.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20(7):1379-90 [PubMed]
METHODS: A pooled analysis of 1,919 couples enrolled in one of seven case-control studies involving cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) or ICC was investigated. Information on smoking and sexual behavior was collected from interviews. Specimens were taken from the cervix and penis for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. Three PS risk models were constructed with all couples, couples with monogamous women, and couples with lifetime nonsmoking monogamous women. For the third model, the analysis considered potential misclassification of smoking status and was restricted to the risk period for which the woman was exposed to both HPV, a necessary cause of ICC, and PS. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate associations between CIS or ICC and PS.
RESULTS: An increased risk was found among couples with both ever smoking men and women (OR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.40-3.64). No statistically increased risk of CIS was found with PS in the models analyzed. Similar significant increased risks of ICC with PS was found among all couples (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.15-2.15) and couples with monogamous women (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.07-2.23) but not among lifetime nonsmoking monogamous women married to ever smoking men.
CONCLUSION: PS could not be detected as an independent risk factor of ICC in the absence of active smoking.
IMPACT: The combined effects of exposure to active and PS suggest its potential adverse role in cervical carcinogenesis.
Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London"I thought cancer was one of those random things. I didn't know cancer could be caught...": adolescent girls' understandings and experiences of the HPV programme in the UK.
Vaccine. 2011; 29(26):4409-15 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHOD: Eighteen focus groups were conducted between December 2009 and May 2010 with schoolgirls aged between 12 and 18 living in various parts of the UK.
RESULTS: Eighty seven girls participated in these discussions. Typically, girls knew very little about HPV or how they could best protect themselves from HPV infection. Although many of the girls linked HPV to cancer, only half specifically associated it with cervical cancer. Most girls had no idea how long the vaccine would offer them protection. They assumed that HPV vaccination must be important for their health because it was recommended by people they trusted, namely parents and immunisation experts. Just over half of the girls were aware that in the future they would need to attend for cervical screening. Key concerns which girls expressed about HPV vaccination reflected their anxieties about needles, anticipated pain on injection, privacy during vaccination and fears about needle cleanliness.
CONCLUSION: Our data point to a need to continue to address gaps in knowledge about HPV and to provide information to address girls' concerns about vaccination. This could be achieved through targeted campaign materials and by ensuring those involved in delivering the programme are aware of girls' anxieties to prevent limited knowledge and fears about vaccination becoming barriers either to HPV vaccination.
MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical carcinoma.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(5):1225-33 [PubMed]
CONCLUSION: There is increasing evidence that FDG PET/CT has a role in the primary evaluation of cervical carcinoma-in particular, for evaluating lymph node status and distant metastatic disease. PET/CT is also helpful to determine prognosis, assess treatment response, and evaluate disease recurrence.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. James's University Hospital, LeedsRole of MRI in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: what the radiologist needs to know.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(3):W341-7 [PubMed]
CONCLUSION: MRI-guided intracavitary brachytherapy is an increasingly used therapy for the treatment of cervical cancer. This technique provides excellent visualization of intracavitary brachytherapy devices and allows accurate localization of residual tumor. It is important for radiologists to be familiar with the correct probe positioning as well as any potential complications.
Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's HospitalIntracellular trafficking and gene expression of pH-sensitive, artificially enveloped adenoviruses in vitro and in vivo.
Biomaterials. 2011; 32(11):3085-93 [PubMed]
Nanomedicine Laboratory, Centre for Drug Delivery Research, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AXModern radiotherapy and cervical cancer.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010; 20(11 Suppl 2):S49-51 [PubMed]
Department of Radiotherapy, St Bartholomew's Hospital, LondonEconomic evaluation of strategies for managing women with equivocal cytological results in Brazil.
Int J Cancer. 2011; 129(3):671-9 [PubMed]
Department of Health Service Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, LondonPrevention of human papilloma virus infection with vaccines.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010; 60(8):676-81 [PubMed]
Medical Oncology, Churchill Hospital, OxfordThe development of priority cervical cancer trials: a Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup report.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010; 20(6):1092-100 [PubMed]
University of Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ManchesterEvaluation of nonenhancing tumor fraction assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI subtraction as a predictor of decrease in tumor volume in response to chemoradiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(2):524-7 [PubMed]
CONCLUSION: This study shows that pretreatment tumor nonenhancing fraction assessed with arterial image subtraction inversely predicts the chemoradiation response in cervical cancer.
Department of Radiology and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's HospitalJade and the journalists: media coverage of a young British celebrity dying of cancer.
Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(5):853-60 [PubMed]
Centre for Death & Society, SPS, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AYPerformance of the Abbott RealTime high-risk HPV test in women with abnormal cervical cytology smears.
J Med Virol. 2010; 82(7):1186-91 [PubMed]
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Queen Mary University of London, LondonIn vitro progression of human papillomavirus 16 episome-associated cervical neoplasia displays fundamental similarities to integrant-associated carcinogenesis.
Cancer Res. 2010; 70(10):4081-91 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
Medical Research Council Cancer Cell Unit, University of Cambridge, CambridgeA pilot study comparing efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Excisor with loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 151(1):91-5 [PubMed]
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective trial during a 2-year period at a district general hospital in London, United Kingdom, including 420 women scheduled for treatment due to CIN, after colposcopy guided biopsy results. This study was expected to demonstrate a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in the proportion of women with clear histopathological resection margins after treatment with CIN Excisor compared with LLETZ. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used to compare histopathological resection margins in the CIN Excisor and LLETZ groups.
RESULTS: Overall, there is strong evidence of a difference in the proportion of histopathological specimens with clear resection margins for the CIN Excisor group, compared with the LLETZ group (201/210, 95.7% versus 180/210, 85.7%: p<0.001). Sub-analysis within the two groups, of the proportion of histopathological specimens with clear resection margins in relation to CIN grades, revealed a statistically significant difference in favour of the CIN Excisor group for CIN 1 (99/103, 96.1% versus 82/95, 86.3%: p=0.01), and CIN 2 (73/77, 94.8% versus 68/80, 85%: p=0.04). There is a numerical difference in the proportion of clear resection margins in favour of the CIN Excisor for CIN 3 (29/30, 96.7% versus 30/35, 85.7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.21). Perioperative complications were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: CIN Excisor achieved better results than LLETZ for treatment of CIN 1-3 with respect to clear histopathological resection margins. However, further studies including a larger number of women treated for CIN 3 are needed before firm conclusions are drawn.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Marys Imperial College NHS Trust, London W2Is human papillomavirus viral load a clinically useful predictive marker? A longitudinal study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(3):832-7 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHODS: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to measure HPV copy number in serial samples taken from 60 and 58 young women previously found to have incident cervical HPV16 or HPV18 infections, respectively, using GP5+/GP6+ primers; women provided at least three samples for qPCR testing, at least one of which was positive.
RESULTS: A 10-fold increase in HPV16 or HPV18 copy number was associated with a modestly increased risk of acquiring a cytologic abnormality [HPV16: hazards ratio, 1.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.25); HPV18: hazards ratio, 1.59 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.03)]. However, in most women, copy number increased during follow-up, before decreasing again. In women with a HPV16 infection, the median copy number per 1,000 cells was 7.7 in their first qPCR HPV-positive sample, 1,237 in the sample yielding the maximum copy number, and 7.8 in their last qPCR HPV-positive sample; corresponding copy numbers for women with HPV18 infection were 2.3, 87, and 2.4. Maximum HPV16 and HPV18 copy number did not differ significantly between women who acquired an incident cervical cytologic abnormality and those who did not.
CONCLUSION: Whereas large relative increases in copy number are associated with an increased risk of abnormality, a single measurement of viral load made at an indeterminate point during the natural history of HPV infection does not reliably predict the risk of acquiring cervical neoplasia. Therefore, a single measure of HPV viral load cannot be considered a clinically useful biomarker.
Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, BirminghamA comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.
Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63(3):691-700 [PubMed]
Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, ManchesterSee publications from around the world in CancerIndex: Cervical Cancer
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
