| Ovarian Cancer |
|
|
Cancer of the ovaries are the second most common group of gynaecologic cancers, and account for about 5% of all women's cancers. There are two main types; (i) epithelial tumours (carcinomas) which account for 90% of ovarian cancers, and (ii) non-epithelial tumours (eg. Stroma cell and germ cell tumours of the ovary). The epithelial ovarian cancers are usually found in women aged over 40, while the non-epithelial tumours are more common in girls and young women. Epithelial ovarian cancer has few early symptoms, a risk factor is having a family history of the disease. Taking the contraceptive pill is known to be protective against ovarian cancer.
Menu: Ovarian Cancer
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research PublicationsInformation Patients and the Public (20 links)
- Ovarian Epithelial Cancer Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Research UK
CancerHelp information is examined by both expert and lay reviewers. Content is reviewed every 12 to 18 months. Further info. - Ovarian Cancer
Cancer.Net
Content is peer reviewed and Cancer.Net has an Editorial Board of experts and advocates. Content is reviewed annually or as needed. Further info. - Ovarian Cancer
Macmillan Cancer Support
Content is developed by a team of information development nurses and content editors, and reviewed by health professionals. Further info. - Ovarian Cancer
NHS Choices
NHS Choices information is quality assured by experts and content is reviewed at least every 2 years. Further info. - Ovarian Cancer
http://www.patedu.com
Video: This patient education video will help you understand how ovarian cancer is detected and treated. The program covers anatomy, symptoms, causes, and treatment options. - What You Need to Know About Ovarian Cancer
National Cancer Institute
Detailed online booklet. - German Ovarian Cancer Foundation
Stiftung Eierstockkrebs - Translate this page
Promoting awareness and providing advocacy for ovarian cancer on Germany. - Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Registry
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
The registry, founded in, is researching the causes of familial cancer. Women over the age of 18, in families with 2 or more diagnoses of ovarian cancer are eligible to register. The site includes details of research and information about ovarian cancer. - Ovacome
Ovacome
A national support group and registered charity founded in 1996. The site includes details of the telephone helpline, local support groups and information about ovarian cancer. - Ovarian Cancer
American Cancer Society
Detailed Guide - Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Australia
Detailed information covering types of ovarian cancer, causes, glossary, awareness, diagnosis, treatment and other topics. - Ovarian Cancer Australia
Ovarian Cancer Australia
A national organisation, incorporated in 2001, which aims to support, educate, advocate, and promote research. The website includes extensive information about ovarian cancer and details of local support groups. - Ovarian Cancer Canada
Ovarian Cancer Canada
A registered charity providing support, raising awareness and raising funds for research. - Ovarian Cancer FAQs
Association for International Cancer Research - Ovarian Cancer National Alliance
OCNA
Founded by advocates from around the USA in 1997, the Alliance raises funds for research, provides advocacy and support. - Ovarian cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief. - Ovarian Problems Discussion List
ACOR
Online discussion board. - South Carolina Ovarian Cancer Foundation
SCOCF
Founded by patients in 1999, SCOCF provides support for ovarian cancer patients, education of the public and healthcare providers, and aims to further research on ovarian cancer in the state of South Carolina. - Target Ovarian Cancer
Target Ovarian Cancer
A UK charity aiming to improve early diagnosis, fund research and provide support for women with ovarian cancer. The Website includes information for patients and for health professionals.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (11 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Ovarian Cancer - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Ovarian Cancer
MeSH term: Ovarian Neoplasms
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Ovarian Epithelial Cancer Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Ovarian Cancer
Patient UK
PatientUK content is peer reviewed. Content is reviewed by a team led by a Clinical Editor to reflect new or updated guidance and publications. Further info. - What is the Treatment of Stage 1 to 3 Ovarian Cancer?
http://www.hemonc101.com/
Video: Dr. Tony Talebi discusses "What is Ovarian Cancer and the Treatment of Stage 1 to 3 Ovarian Cancer?" with Dr. Lucci, University of Miami. - Ovarian Cancer
NHS Evidence
Regularly updated and reviewed. Further info. - What is and the Treatment of Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer?
http://www.hemonc101.com/
Video: Dr. Tony Talebi discusses "What is the Treatment of Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer?" with Dr. Lucci, University of Miami. - Adnexa of Uterus - Cancers
Oncolex - Oslo University Hospital (Norway) and MD Andersen (USA)
Adnexa of uterus refer to the anatomical structures of the uterus including the: Ovaries, Fallopian tubes and Broad ligaments. - Borderline Ovarian Cancer
Medscape
Detailed referenced article by Andrew Green, MD. - Ovarian Cancer
Medscape
Detailed referenced article by Andrew Green, MD. - Ovarian cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief. - SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Ovary
SEER, National Cancer Institute
Overview and specific fact sheets on incidence and mortality, survival and stage, lifetime risk, and prevalence.
Latest Research Publications
This list of publications is regularly updated (Source: PubMed).
Primary fallopian tube carcinoma with metastasis in the contralateral ovary.
J Indian Med Assoc. 2012; 110(7):494-5, 498 [PubMed]
Safety and efficacy of video laparoscopic surgical debulking of recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers.
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec; 16(4):511-8 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective case series. Women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers deemed appropriate candidates for laparoscopic debulking by the primary surgeon(s) were recruited. The patients underwent exploratory video laparoscopy, biopsy, and laparoscopic secondary/tertiary cytoreduction between June 1999 and October 2009. Variables analyzed include stage, site of disease, extent of cytoreduction, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and survival time.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Only one surgery involved conversion to laparotomy. Seventeen (77.3%) of the patients had stage IIIC disease at the time of their initial diagnosis, and 20 (90.9%) had laparotomy for primary debulking. Median blood loss was 75 mL, median operative time 200 min, and median hospital stay 2 d. No intraoperative complications occurred. One patient (4.5%) had postoperative ileus. Eighteen (81.8%) of the patients with recurrent disease were optimally cytoreduced to 1cm. Overall, 12 patients have no evidence of disease (NED), 6 are alive with disease (AWD), and 4 have died of disease (DOD), over a median follow-up of 14 mo. Median disease-free survival was 71.9 mo.
CONCLUSIONS: In a well-selected population, laparoscopy is technically feasible and can be utilized to optimally cytoreduce patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancers.
Phase II study of carboplatin and weekly irinotecan combination chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: a Kansai clinical oncology group study (KCOG0330).
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):1073-9 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with either radiologically- or serologically-recurrent EOC were administered intravenous irinotecan (60 mg/m(2); days 1 and 8) and carboplatin area under the curve of 5 mg/ml/min (day 1), repeated every 21 days. The primary end-point was response rate (RR), while the secondary end-points were adverse events and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2009, 40 patients (median age=59 years) with EOC were enrolled. Intention-to-treat analysis showed an RR of 43% [95% confidence interval (CI)=27-58%]. For patients with a platinum-free interval (PFI) of <6 months, overall RR based on RECIST was 21% (95% CI=0-43%) and median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI=2.5-7.7 months), while those in patients with PFI ≥6 months were 52% (95% CI=31-74%) and 9.1 months (95% CI=7.9-11.2 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicity encountered during the first cycle included G3/G4 neutropenia in 65% of patients (12/14), G3/G4 thrombocytopenia in 48% (18/1), G3 febrile neutropenia in 5% (2), G3 nausea in 5% (2), G3 diarrhea in 5% (2), and G3 fatigue in 5% of patients (2).
CONCLUSION: This carboplatin plus irinotecan combination demonstrated a modest activity in recurrent EOC. However, considering its hematological toxicities, the regimen should be further investigated to establish the feasibility of the modified dose for platinum-sensitive disease.
Progression-free survival is accurately predicted in patients treated with chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer by the histoculture drug response assay in a prospective correlative clinical trial at a single institution.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):1029-34 [PubMed]
A population-based series of ovarian carcinosarcomas with long-term follow-up.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):1003-8 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 81 ovarian carcinosarcomas from two well-defined geographic regions were studied with regard to survival, type of primary and adjuvant therapy and prognostic factors. All patients but one underwent primary surgery and some patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy (platinum-based) alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis was used. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier technique and differences were assessed by the log-rank test.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 73 years. Fifty-one patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and nine patients pelvic irradiation. The 5-year overall survival rate was 10%. Adjuvant therapy (any type) and six completed cycles of chemotherapy were highly significant factors with regard to improved overall survival rate. The only significant tumor-associated prognostic factor was the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade of the tumor. FIGO stage, site of metastatic spread, tumor size, histology, DNA ploidy, and tumor necrosis were non-significant factors. Therapy was rather well-tolerated and 29 patients (57%) completed at least six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Adjuvant and completed chemotherapy according to the treatment plan were the most important prognostic factors. FIGO grade (grade 3 vs. 1-2) of the epithelial component of the tumor was also a significant prognostic factor in multivariate Cox analysis.
β-Elemene and taxanes synergistically induce cytotoxicity and inhibit proliferation in ovarian cancer and other tumor cells.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):929-40 [PubMed]
The role of Notch and gamma-secretase inhibition in an ovarian cancer model.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):801-8 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Established ovarian cancer cell lines were used. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine the relative expression of Notch receptor and ligands. Effects of GS inhibition on proliferation, colony formation, and downstream effectors were examined via methylthiazole tetrazolium (MTT) and Matrigel assays, and qPCR, respectively. In vivo experiments with a GS inhibitor and cisplatin were conducted on nude mice. Tumors were examined for differences in microvessel density, proliferation, and apoptosis.
RESULTS: Notch3 was the most up-regulated receptor. The ligands JAGGED1 and DELTA-LIKE4 were both up-regulated. GS inhibition did not affect cellular proliferation or anchorage-independent cell growth over placebo. The GS inhibitor Compound-E reduced microvessel density in vivo.
CONCLUSION: GS inhibition does not directly affect cellular proliferation in ovarian carcinoma, but Notch pathway blockade may result in angiogenic alterations that may be therapeutically important.
Impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine endometrioid carcinoma.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39(4):350-7 [PubMed]
METHODS: Using an institution-maintained cancer registry database, all patients who were treated surgically for endometrial cancer from 1991 to 2008 in two medical centers were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to determine the role of lymphadenectomy.
RESULTS: From 961 women with uterine endometrioid carcinoma, 680 underwent lymphadenectomy and 281 did not. Young age, early-stage disease, low-grade tumor, and lymphadenectomy were favorable independent prognostic factors. The five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of stages IA, IB, II, and III, and the two-year DSS of stage IV patients who underwent lymphadenectomy were 97.8%, 88.3%, 91.5%, 70.5%, and 32.1%, respectively, compared to 98.7%, 70.0%, 73.3%, 42.9%, and 16.6% in those without lymphadenectomy (p > 0.05 for stage IA; p < 0.01 for stages IB-IV, log-rank test). In high-risk patients (i.e., poorly-differentiated, outer-half myometrial invasion, and stages II-IV), more extensive lymph node resection was associated with an improved five-year DSS, from 71.3% (1-10 nodes removed) and 85.3% (11-20 nodes removed) to 86.8% (>20 nodes removed) (p = 0.02, log-rank test). For stage IIIC-IV patients with nodal metastasis, the extent of node resection also significantly improved the five-year DSS, from 34.4% (1-10 nodes removed) and 62.4% (11-20 nodes removed) to 79.6% (>20 nodes removed) (p = 0.04, log-rank test).
CONCLUSIONS: Lymphadenectomy improves the survival of patients with uterine endometrioid carcinoma stage IB to stage IV. The extent of lymphadenectomy also improves the survival of high-risk patients and those with nodal disease.
Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a diagnosis frequently overlooked.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137(3):438-42 [PubMed]
Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2:CD008765 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between 0 cm and 2 cm, on overall survival.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to December 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. For databases other than MEDLINE, the search strategy has been adapted accordingly.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Retrospective data on residual disease, or data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective/retrospective observational studies that included a multivariate analysis of 50 or more adult women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (KG, TA) independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.
MAIN RESULTS: There were no RCTs; however, we found nine non-randomised studies that reported on 1194 women with comparison of residual disease after secondary cytoreduction using a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. These retrospective and prospective studies assessed survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.Meta- and single-study analyses show the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction to microscopic disease, since overall survival was significantly prolonged in these groups of women (most studies showed a large statistically significant greater risk of death in all residual disease groups compared to microscopic disease).Recurrence-free survival was not reported in any of the studies. All of the studies included at least 50 women and used statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors. One study compared sub-optimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction and demonstrated benefit to achieving cytoreduction to less than 1 cm, if microscopic disease could not be achieved (hazard ratio (HR) 3.51, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.70). Similarly, one study found that women whose tumour had been cytoreduced to less than 0.5 cm had less risk of death compared to those with residual disease greater than 0.5 cm after surgery (HR not reported; P value < 0.001).There is high risk of bias due to the non-randomised nature of these studies, where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection is based on retrospective achievability of cytoreduction, not an intention to treat, and so a degree of bias is inevitable.Adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness were not reported in any of the studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, ability to achieve surgery with complete cytoreduction (no visible residual disease) is associated with significant improvement in overall survival. However, in the absence of RCT evidence, it is not clear whether this is solely due to surgical effect or due to tumour biology. Indirect evidence would support surgery to achieve complete cytoreduction in selected women. The risks of major surgery need to be carefully balanced against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis.
Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in combination with surgery for ovarian carcinosarcoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2:CD006246 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of various adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy options or chemotherapy alone in combination with surgery in the management of ovarian carcinosarcoma.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to February 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of review articles and contacted experts in the field.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, or chemotherapy alone, in women with ovarian carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed Mullerian sarcoma of the ovary). We also reviewed non-randomised studies (NRS) for discussion in the absence of RCTs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. No trials were found and therefore no data were analysed.
MAIN RESULTS: The search strategy identified 297 unique references of which all were excluded.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to inform decisions about neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens, or chemotherapy alone, for women with ovarian carcinosarcoma. Ideally, an RCT that is multicentre or multinational, or well designed non-randomised studies that use multivariate analysis to adjust for baseline imbalances, are needed to compare treatment modalities and improve current knowledge. Further research in genetic and molecular signalling pathways might improve understanding of this tumour subtype.
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2:CD005344 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and risks of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical treatment of FIGO stage I ovarian cancer (stages Ia, Ib and Ic).
SEARCH METHODS: For the original review, we searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials (CGCRG) Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Biological Abstracts and CancerLit from 1 January 1990 to 30 November 2007. We also handsearched relevant journals, reference lists of identified studies and conference abstracts. For this updated review, we extended the CGCRG Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS searches to 6 December 2011.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and prospective case-control studies comparing laparoscopic staging with open surgery (laparotomy) in women with stage I ovarian cancer according to FIGO.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: There were no studies to include, therefore we tabulated data from non-randomised studies (NRS) for discussion.
MAIN RESULTS: We performed no meta-analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review has found no good-quality evidence to help quantify the risks and benefits of laparoscopy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer as routine clinical practice.
Laparoscopic surgery for presumed benign ovarian tumor during pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 1:CD005459 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of using laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumor during pregnancy on maternal and fetal health and the use of healthcare resources.
SEARCH METHODS: We updated the search of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register on 11 November 2012.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumor in pregnancy to conventional laparotomy technique.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors planned to independently assess trial quality and extract data.
MAIN RESULTS: The updated search did not identify any randomized controlled trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The practice of laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumour during pregnancy is associated with benefits and harms. However, the evidence for the magnitude of these benefits and harms is drawn from case series studies, associated with potential bias. The results and conclusions of these studies must therefore be interpreted with caution.The available case series studies of laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumour during pregnancy provide limited insight into the potential benefits and harms associated with this new surgical technique in pregnancy. Randomized controlled trials are required to provide the most reliable evidence regarding the benefits and harms of laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumour during pregnancy.
Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs carbohydrate antigen 125 for ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
J Clin Pathol. 2013; 66(4):273-81 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVE: To critically revise the available literature on the comparison between the diagnostic accuracy of HE4 and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125) to confirm the additional clinical value of HE4.
METHODS: A literature search was undertaken on electronic databases and references from retrieved articles; articles were analysed according to predefined criteria. Meta-analyses for HE4 and CA-125 biomarkers with OR, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios as effect sizes were performed.
RESULTS: 16 articles were originally included in meta-analyses, but two for HE4 and one for CA-125 were eliminated as outliers. Furthermore, for HE4 a publication bias was detected. ORs for both HE4 (37.2, 95% CI 19.0 to 72.7, adjusted for publication bias) and CA-125 (15.4, 95% CI 10.4 to 22.8) were significant, although in a heterogeneous set of studies (p<0.0001). By combining sensitivity and specificity, the overall LR+ and LR- were 13.0 (95% CI 8.2 to 20.7) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.28) for HE4 and 4.2 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.6) and 0.27 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.31) for CA-125, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: HE4 measurement seems to be superior to CA-125 in terms of diagnostic performance for identification of OC in women with suspected gynaecological disease. Due to the high prevalence of OC in post-menopausal women and the need for data focused on early tumour stages, more studies tailored on these specific subsets are needed.
Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2013; 13(4):273-82 [PubMed]
Histologic evaluation of prophylactic hysterectomy and oophorectomy in Lynch syndrome.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(4):579-85 [PubMed]
Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients.
Virchows Arch. 2013; 462(3):289-96 [PubMed]
Role of macrophage targeting in the antitumor activity of trabectedin.
Cancer Cell. 2013; 23(2):249-62 [PubMed]
Integrated analyses identify a master microRNA regulatory network for the mesenchymal subtype in serous ovarian cancer.
Cancer Cell. 2013; 23(2):186-99 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 11/02/2014
Bidirectional modulation of endogenous EpCAM expression to unravel its function in ovarian cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(4):881-6 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 05/03/2014
METHODS: Cell survival of ovarian cancer cell lines was studied after induction or repression of endogenous EpCAM expression using siRNA/cDNA or artificial transcription factors (ATF) consisting of engineered zinc-fingers fused to either a transcriptional activator or repressor domain.
RESULTS: Two ATFs were selected as the most potent down- and upregulator, showing at least a two-fold alteration of EpCAM protein expression compared with control. Downregulation of EpCAM expression resulted in growth inhibition in breast cancer, but showed no effect on cell growth in ovarian cancer. Induction or further upregulation of EpCAM expression decreased ovarian cancer cell survival.
CONCLUSION: The bidirectional ATF-based approach is uniquely suited to study cell-type-specific biological effects of EpCAM expression. Using this approach, the oncogenic function of EpCAM in breast cancer was confirmed. Despite its value as a diagnostic marker and for immunotherapy, EpCAM does not seem to represent a therapeutic target for gene expression silencing in ovarian cancer.
The blood-follicle barrier (BFB) in disease and in ovarian function.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012; 763:186-92 [PubMed]
Overcoming chemotherapy resistance of ovarian cancer cells by liposomal cisplatin: molecular mechanisms unveiled by gene expression profiling.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2013; 85(8):1077-90 [PubMed]
Prognostic impact of fascin-1 (FSCN1) in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(2):371-7 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expression analysis was performed by immunohistochemistry of paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 89 patients with EOC. Staining intensity and the percentage of positively stained tumor cells were used to calculate an immunoreactive score of 0-12 (IRS). These results were correlated to clinical and pathological characteristics as well as to patient survival.
RESULTS: Negative (IRS=0), weak (IRS=0-2) and strong (IRS>2) expression of FSCN1 in EOC was found in 5 (5.6%), 30 (33.7%) and 54 (60.7%) tumor samples, respectively. There was a strong correlation of residual postoperative tumor of >1 cm with higher immunoexpression of FSCN1 (p=0.04). Lower FSCN1 expression was associated with significantly poorer overall survival (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: FSCN1 is frequently expressed in primary EOC. Its prognostic impact and function remains inconclusive and should be further examined in larger trials.
Abdominal cocoon: a potential pitfall in patients with ovarian carcinoma.
Tumori. 2012; 98(6):176e-8e [PubMed]
Ovarian surface epithelial neoplasms in the pediatric population: incidence, histologic subtype, and natural history.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(4):548-53 [PubMed]
Targeted anti-vascular therapies for ovarian cancer: current evidence.
Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(2):250-8 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 05/03/2014
Advanced ovarian cancer: omental bursa, lesser omentum, celiac, portal and triad nodes spread as cause of inaccurate evaluation of residual tumor.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 129(1):92-6 [PubMed]
METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients diagnosed with AOC, who underwent a complete cytoreduction. Demographics, surgical procedures, morbidities, pathologic findings and correlations with OB spread were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 37 patients had an optimal debulking including OB evaluation and peritonectomy. The OB area procedure required in mean 65 min with an estimated blood loss of 250 ml. OB involvement was found in 67% (25/37) of cases. Peritoneal disease was found in 22 cases including 18 supragastric lesser sac and 4 porta hepatis peritoneum. CNs metastases were found in 5 cases, of which 3 cases are with bulky nodes, all presented also bulky nodes in the para-aortic area. Only in the case of a macroscopic involvement of the diaphragm OB was positive for disease. When adhesions occluding the Winslow foramen were present, no OB peritoneum involvement was found. OB resection related complications were low (2 out 25).
CONCLUSIONS: The data of this prospective study demonstrate the high rate of OB, surface of the pancreas, lesser omentum, caudate lobe, CNs, portal and triad nodes involvement and the value of investigating the dissemination and cytoreduction in these sites to obtain a real optimal debulking.
Rsf-1, a chromatin remodelling protein, interacts with cyclin E1 and promotes tumour development.
J Pathol. 2013; 229(4):559-68 [PubMed]
TC-1 (C8orf4) expression is correlated with differentiation in ovarian carcinomas and might distinguish metastatic ovarian from metastatic colorectal carcinomas.
Virchows Arch. 2013; 462(3):281-7 [PubMed]
Lycorine hydrochloride selectively inhibits human ovarian cancer cell proliferation and tumor neovascularization with very low toxicity.
Toxicol Lett. 2013; 218(2):174-85 [PubMed]
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
