Cancer of Unknown Primary
Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) makes up about 3% of all people diagnosed with cancer. CUP is where cancer is found to have spread to secondary site(s) but routine testing could not find where the cancer started (the primary site). Even with specialised testing the primary site still cannot be identified for many people. Sometimes this may be because the primary tumuor is still very small, or the primary tumour has shrunk or totally disappeared, or the primary tumour was removed during previous surgery for another condition. The most frequent type of CUP are carcinomas (cancer starting in epithelial cells), often the cells are poorly differentiated (hard to tell the specific cell type under the microscope), making it hard to identify the specific part of the body where the cancer started.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research Publications
Information Patients and the Public (14 links)
Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info.
Macmillan Cancer Support
Content is developed by a team of information development nurses and content editors, and reviewed by health professionals. Further info.
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP)
Cancer Research UK
CancerHelp information is examined by both expert and lay reviewers. Content is reviewed every 12 to 18 months. Further info.
Cancer.Net
Content is peer reviewed and Cancer.Net has an Editorial Board of experts and advocates. Content is reviewed annually or as needed. Further info.
1. Introduction to Cancer Of The Unknown Primary
Cancer Council New South Wales
2. Diagnosing Cancer Of The Unknown Primary
Cancer Council New South Wales
3. Treating Cancer Of The Unknown Primary
Cancer Council New South Wales
4 Caring & Support For Cancer Of The Unknown Primary
Cancer Council New South Wales
ACOR
unmoderated Email discussion list.
American Cancer Society
Detailed Guide.
Cancer of unknown primary statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief.
A UK charity
Organization founded to raise awareness of CUP.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (7 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Cancer of Unknown Primary Site - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Cancer of Unknown Primary Site
MeSH term: Neoplasms, Unknown Primary
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated.
Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info.
Patient UK
PatientUK content is peer reviewed. Content is reviewed by a team led by a Clinical Editor to reflect new or updated guidance and publications. Further info.
"Carcinomatosis is described as a condition in which multiple carcinomas develop simultaneously, usually after dissemination from a primary source....The term is usually taken to mean that there are multiple secondaries in multiple sites...."
Patient UK
PatientUK content is peer reviewed. Content is reviewed by a team led by a Clinical Editor to reflect new or updated guidance and publications. Further info.
Cancer of Unknown Primary Site
Oncolex - Oslo University Hospital (Norway) and MD Andersen (USA)
Detailed reference article covering etiology, histology, staging, metastatic patterns, symptoms, differential diagnoses, prognosis, treatment and follow-up.
Cancer of unknown primary statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief.
Latest Research Publications
This list of publications is regularly updated (Source: PubMed).
Validation of Human Papillomavirus as a Favourable Prognostic Marker and Analysis of CD8(+) Tumour-infiltrating Lymphocytes and Other Biomarkers in Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck Region.
Anticancer Res. 2017; 37(2):665-673 [PubMed] Related Publications
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 19 HNCUPs diagnosed 2008-2013 were analyzed for HPV DNA by polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR) and p16 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Thereafter, 69 HNCUPs diagnosed between 2000-2013 were analyzed for HPV16 mRNA by PCR (if HPV16DNA-positive) and cluster of differentiation 8 positive (CD8(+)) tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I-expression using IHC.
RESULTS: HPV DNA, alone and in combination with p16 overexpression, was validated as a favourable prognostic factor in HNCUP. HPV16 mRNA was present in most HPV16 DNA-positive cases, confirming HPV-driven carcinogenesis in HNCUP. High CD8(+) TIL counts indicated favourable prognosis.
CONCLUSION: HPV status is useful for the management of patients with HNCUP and the role of CD8(+) TILs should be further explored.
Multiple preinvasive and invasive HPV-related lesions of the anogenital tract in a female patient with HIV infection: A case report.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(4):e5948 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported the case of an HIV-positive female patient on HAART with a good virological and immunological response and with a long history of HPV-related intraepithelial and invasive lesions of the anogenital tract.
DIAGNOSES: From 1996 to 2016, this patient was diagnosed with a high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; a HR-HPV positive inguinal lymph node metastasis from clinically undetectable primary squamous cell carcinoma; a HPV-related vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and an invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.
INTERVENTIONS: All the intraepithelial and invasive lesions detected were properly treated, and subsequent follow up visits with gynecologic examination, anoscopy, pap smear and anal cytology were performed.
OUTCOMES: After a recurrence of the anal cancer and a subsequent salvage surgery with abdominoperineal resection, at the last available follow up visit no sign of disease recurrence was found.
LESSONS: This case stresses the importance of an accurate multidisciplinary follow-up in HIV-positive patients, including not only the routine medical, immunological, and virological evaluation, but also a periodical complete examination of the anogenital tract with cervicovaginal and anal cytology, colposcopy, high resolution anoscopy, and vulvar examination.
Neck lymph node metastases from unknown primary.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017; 53:1-9 [PubMed] Related Publications
Investigation and management of the unknown primary with metastatic neck disease: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.
J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130(S2):S170-S175 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
Impact of 3T multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET-CT in the evaluation of occult primary cancer with cervical node metastasis.
Cancer Imaging. 2016; 16(1):38 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
METHODS: The study group comprised 38 retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with LN metastasis in the head and neck (HN) region without known primary tumours (PTs). Statistical values of 3T-MRI and of FDG-PET/CT scans were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 38 CUPs, conventional native T1-, T2-weighted and STIR sequences detected 6 PTs. Native sequences plus diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) found 14-, and with fat suppression contrast-enhanced T1-weighted measurement as well as with the complex MPMRI found 15 primaries and with PET/CT 17 CUPs could be evaluated, respectively. The detection rates were 15.8, 36.8, 39.5, 39.5 and 44.7 % for conventional native MRI, native plus DWI, native with contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), for MPMRI, and for PET/CT, respectively. The overall detection rate proved by histology was 47.4 %. PET/CT provided the highest sensitivity (Sv: 94.4 %) but a lower specificity (Sp: 65.0 %), using MPMRI (Sv: 88.2 %) the specificity increased to 71.4 %. DWIincreased specificity of the native sequences (Sp: 76.2 %). Conventional native sequences plus DWI as well as 3T-MPMRI and PET/CT were same accurate (Acc: 79.0 %) and had similar likelihood ratio (LR: 3.42, 3.03 and 2.62) in detecting unknown PT sites.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of FDG-PET/CT and MPMRI in case of CUP in finding the primary cancer in the neck regions is identical. While using PET/CT whole body information can be obtained in one examination. MPMRI shows the local soft tissue status more accurately. In cases of CUP PET/CT should be the first method of choice if it is available. MPMRI can clarify the exact primary tumor stage, and it can be advantageous in clarifying the prognostic factors, which is necessary in case of advanced tumor stage and when surgery is under consideration. In case low N stage is likely after the clinical examination and wait and see policy can be considered, MPMRI is recommended, and in this case the significance the of radiation free MPMRI is increasing.
NMDA receptor encephalitis with cancer of unknown primary origin.
Tumori. 2016; 102(Suppl. 2) [PubMed] Related Publications
METHODS: We report 2 male cases of NMDAR encephalitis presenting with metastatic cancer of unknown primary origin.
RESULTS: Both patients showed cognitive dysfunction as well as other neurological symptoms, slow waves on EEG, and NMDAR antibodies in sera and CSF. Symptoms were effectively treated by pulse steroid and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. The patients developed metastatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid gland and inguinal metastatic squamous cell cancer shortly after their neurological episodes. Follow-up PET studies showed small cell lung cancer in the first patient while no primary origin could be found in the second patient.
CONLUSIONS: Our cases imply that NMDAR encephalitis may present with metastatic cancers that display slow progression rates and occur after encephalitis attacks.
Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT.
Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(11):1941-1947 [PubMed] Related Publications
METHODS: A total of 20 patients (15 male, 5 female, age 53±13 years) suspect for CUP underwent a dedicated head and neck & whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT (Biograph mCT 128, Siemens Healthcare) and a subsequent simultaneous [18F]FDG-PET/MRI examination (Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare). Two readers rated the datasets (PET/CT; PET/MRI) regarding the detection of the primary cancer and metastases, lesion conspicuity (4-point ordinal scale) and diagnostic confidence (3-point ordinal scale). PET analysis comprised the assessment of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of all PET-positive lesions using volume of interest (VOI) analysis derived from the PET/CT and PET/MR datasets. All available data considering histology and imaging including prior and clinical follow-up examinations served as reference standard. Statistical analysis included comparison of mean values using Mann-Whitney U test and correlation of SUVmax using Pearson's correlation.
RESULTS: In 14 out of 20 patients 49 malignant lesions were present. The primary cancer could be correctly identified in 11/20 patients with both PET/CT and PET/MRI. PET/CT enabled the detection of a total 38 metastases, PET/MR respectively of 37 metastases (one lung metastasis <5mm was missed). PET/CT and PET/MRI showed comparably high lesion conspicuity (2.6±0.6 each), with superior assessment of cervical lesions in PET/MRI and an indicated superior assessment of pulmonary lesions in PET/CT. Diagnostic confidence was rated comparably high in PET/CT and PET/MRI (2.7±0.5 each). The mean values of SUVmax of all PET-positive lesions (PET/MRT 7.9±4.2 vs. PET/CT 7.2±3.5) showed a strong positive correlation between the SUVs derived from both hybrid imaging systems (Pearson's correlation r=0.927).
CONCLUSIONS: Both hybrid imaging techniques provide a comparable diagnostic ability for detection of primary cancer and metastases in patients with CUP, with comparably high lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence, offering superior assessment of cervical lesions in PET/MRI and potentially of pulmonary lesions in PET/CT. Furthermore, due to the significantly lower dose of ionizing radiation, PET/MRI may serve as a powerful alternative to PET/CT, particularly for therapy monitoring and/or surveillance considering the long-term cumulative dose.
Bilateral Huge Incidentalomas of Isolated Adrenal Metastases From Unknown Primary Melanoma Revealed by 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Clin Nucl Med. 2017; 42(1):e51-e53 [PubMed] Related Publications
Proportion and characteristics of men with unknown risk category in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden.
Acta Oncol. 2016; 55(12):1461-1466 [PubMed] Related Publications
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Men diagnosed with Pca between 1998 and 2012 registered in NPCR with known or unknown risk category were compared with respect to age, socioeconomic factors, comorbidity, cancer characteristics, cancer treatment, and mortality from Pca and other causes.
RESULTS: In total, 3315 of 129 391 (3%) men had unknown risk category. Compared to other men in NPCR, these men more often had a concomitant bladder cancer diagnosis, 19% versus 1%, diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia 31% versus 5%, received unspecified Pca treatment 16% versus 3%, had higher comorbidity, Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 or higher, 34% versus 13%, and had lower Pca mortality 12% versus 30%, but similar mortality from other causes.
CONCLUSION: Men with unknown risk category were rare in NPCR but distinctly different from other men in NPCR in many aspects including higher comorbidity and lower Pca mortality.
Cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown origin: the diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT and clinical outcome.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 274(2):1015-1019 [PubMed] Related Publications
Volume-based predictive biomarkers of sequential FDG-PET/CT for sunitinib in cancer of unknown primary: identification of the best benefited patients.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 44(2):199-205 [PubMed] Related Publications
METHODS: CUP patients were enrolled for sequential PET/CT scanning for sunitinib and a control group. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to test the efficacy of sunitinib therapy in CUP patients. Next, sequential analyses involving PET/CT parameters were performed to identify and validate sensitive PET/CT biomarkers for sunitinib therapy. Finally, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (TDROC) analyses were performed to compare the predictive accuracy.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis proved that sunitinib group had significantly improved survival (p < 0.01) as compared to control group. After cycle 2 of therapy, multivariate analysis identified volume-based PET/CT parameters as sensitive biomarkers for sunitinib (p < 0.01). TDROC curves demonstrated whole-body total lesion glycolysis reduction (Δ WTLG) and follow-up WTLG to have good accuracy for efficacy prediction. This evidence was validated after cycle 4 of therapy with the same method.
CONCLUSION: Sunitinib therapy proved effective in treatment of CUP. PET/CT volume-based parameters may help predict outcome of sunitinib therapy, in which Δ WTLG and follow-up WTLG seem to be sensitive biomarkers for sunitinib efficacy. Patients with greater reduction and lower WTLG at follow-up seem to have better survival outcome.
Discordance Between Cobas BRAF V600 Testing and VE1 Immunohistochemistry in a Melanoma Patient With Bone Marrow Metastases.
Am J Dermatopathol. 2016; 38(9):687-9 [PubMed] Related Publications
Unknown primary adenocarcinomas: a single-center experience.
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2016; 16(4):292-297 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
Pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: a case report and review of the literature.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2016; 37(3):430-3 [PubMed] Related Publications
A Nordic survey on the management of head and neck CUP.
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016; 136(11):1159-1163 [PubMed] Related Publications
OBJECTIVES: The initiative for this study was based on the lack of common guidelines for diagnostic procedures and for treatment of HNCUP patients in the Nordic countries constituting a region having a rather homogeneous population.
METHOD: A structured questionnaire was sent to all university hospitals in the five Nordic countries.
RESULTS: Four of the five Nordic countries use either national guidelines or specific protocols when handling HNCUP. The main diagnostic tools are PET-CT, fine needle aspiration, endoscopic evaluation with biopsies, and most often bilateral tonsillectomy. At 21 of 22 university hospitals the treatment decision is made at a multidisciplinary conference. Three of seven Swedish centres use only radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy to treat N+ HNCUP patients. Robotic surgery for biopsy of the tongue base is beginning to become an alternative to targeted biopsies in Sweden and Finland. Narrow Band Imaging is used only in Finland.
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma - Unknown Primary Affecting the Neck.
Anticancer Res. 2016; 36(6):3169-71 [PubMed] Related Publications
Small clonal B-cell population in the bone marrow as a possible tool in the diagnosis of occult primary parotid lymphoma.
Colomb Med (Cali). 2016; 47(1):59-62 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
CLINICAL FINDINGS: Small clonal B-cells populations (SCBP) also known as monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis was found as part of the workup for an idiopathic thrombocytopenia and lead ultimately to the diagnosis of parotid primary follicular lymphoma coexisting with Warthin tumor involving the bone marrow in a small extent and oncocytic papilloma located in the maxillary sinus.
TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Patient was treated with Rituximab monotherapy with improvement on her platelet count.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although it is unclear the role of this clonal cells, they may work as a possible diagnostic tool for occult lymphomas. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm this possible association.
Occult Mediastinal Yolk Sac Tumor Producing α-Fetoprotein Detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Clin Nucl Med. 2016; 41(7):585-6 [PubMed] Related Publications
Parotid melanoma of unknown primary.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016; 142(7):1529-37 [PubMed] Related Publications
METHODS: We analyzed cases from three sources: (1) the University Hospitals Case Medical Center pathology database (n = 45), (2) the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database (n = 33), and (3) a comprehensive literature search (n = 32).
RESULTS: PMUP patients were predominately male and presented at a mean age of 56 years. When compared to PMKP, PMUP cases were more likely to be diagnosed in the parotid parenchyma, present with stage IV disease, and develop distant metastases during follow-up in a shorter amount of time. However, there was no difference in overall survival between patients with PMUP and PMKP presenting with stage-matched disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival is similar for stage-matched patients with parotid melanoma presenting with an unknown and known primary site.
Venous thromboembolism and occult cancer: impact on clinical practice.
Thromb Res. 2016; 140 Suppl 1:S8-11 [PubMed] Related Publications
A follow-up analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detecting hidden malignancies at the time of diagnosis of membranous nephropathy.
Oncotarget. 2016; 7(9):9645-51 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
Age-Dependent Metastatic Spread and Survival: Cancer of Unknown Primary as a Model.
Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23725 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
Location of metastases in cancer of unknown primary are not random and signal familial clustering.
Sci Rep. 2016; 6:22891 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of unknown primary: is early surgical exploration and aggressive debulking justifiable?
Chin Clin Oncol. 2016; 5(1):4 [PubMed] Related Publications
METHODS: The charts for all 342 surgical patients, seen in our clinic at Ochsner-Kenner between 1/2009 and 9/2012 were retrospectively reviewed to determine which patients had a pre-operative diagnosis of a "NET with unknown primary". Twenty-two patients (6.4%) were identified. For these patients, the rate of successful surgical exploration in which a primary site was identified was recorded. Survival for these "unknown primary" patients were compared to a large similar group of NET patients from a recent study collected from this same Ochsner clinic group.
RESULTS: Twenty-two (22/342, 6.4%) NET patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of an unknown primary were explored and cytoreduced. The primary tumor site was identified in all 22 patients (100%). The primary sites identified for these patients were 19 small intestines (86.4%) and 3 pancreatic (13.6%). All 22 patients had low-grade tumors and all were still alive as of 9/2012, not allowing for a survival curve to be generated.
CONCLUSIONS: Unknown primary NETs are not associated with a poor prognosis as previously reported. Timely surgical exploration and debulking always results in the identification of the primary and a maximum cytoreduction. Early surgical exploration with aggressive debulking is indicated for the treatment of these patients, as for the known counterpart.
p16-positive lymph node metastases from cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: No association with high-risk human papillomavirus or prognosis and implications for the workup of the unknown primary.
Cancer. 2016; 122(8):1201-8 [PubMed] Related Publications
METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients with cHNSCC lymph node metastases involving the parotid gland were evaluated for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry. The detection of 18 high-risk HPV subtypes was performed with HPV RNA in situ hybridization for a subset of 59 patients. The results were correlated with clinicopathological features and outcomes.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 5.3 years. No differences were observed in clinicopathological factors with respect to the p16 status. p16 was positive, weak, and negative in 45 (31%), 21 (15%), and 77 cases (54%), respectively. No high-risk HPV subtypes were identified, regardless of the p16 status. The p16 status was not prognostic for overall (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.36; P = .528), cancer-specific (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77-1.64; P = .542), or progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83-1.29; P = .783). Distant metastasis-free survival, freedom from locoregional failure, and freedom from local failure were also not significantly associated with the p16 status.
CONCLUSIONS: p16 positivity is common but not prognostic in cHNSCC lymph node metastases. High-risk HPV subtypes are not associated with p16 positivity and do not appear to play a role in this disease. HPV testing, in addition to the p16 status in the unknown primary setting, may provide additional information for determining a putative primary site.
Unusual presentation of melanoma of unknown primary origin: A case report and review of literature.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec; 11(4):1025 [PubMed] Related Publications
Familial Risk in Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary.
JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2(3):340-6 [PubMed] Related Publications
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of cancer by site in first- and second-degree relatives and first cousins of individuals with CUP.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Nested case-control study of patients who received a diagnosis of CUP between 1980 and 2010 identified from the Utah Cancer Registry. Population controls with no CUP diagnosis were sex and age matched 10:1 to patients with CUP. Data about relatives were drawn from the Utah Population Database.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Familial aggregation of cancer risk in relatives of cases compared with controls using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: For the 4160 index patients (median [interquartile range] age, 72 [62-81] years; 47.6% male) who had received a diagnosis of CUP, first-degree relatives were at an elevated risk of CUP themselves (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.07-1.70]), as well as lung (HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.22-1.54]), pancreatic (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.06-1.54]), myeloma (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.01-1.62]), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, >1.00-1.35]) cancers compared with controls without CUP. When the analysis was restricted to relatives of cancer-free controls, additional increased risks for colon (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.33]) and bladder (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, >1.00-1.38]) cancers were observed. Second-degree relatives of patients with CUP were at a slight increased risk of lung (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.26]), pancreatic (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.37]), breast (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16]), melanoma (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, >1.00-1.19]), and ovarian (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.02-1.39]) cancers.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Relatives of patients with CUP are at increased risk of CUP and several other malignant neoplasms, including lung, pancreatic, and colon cancer. The present data may suggest sites of origin for CUP and provide cancer risk information for relatives of patients with CUP that can lead to effective intervention. Relatives of patients with CUP should be aware of the elevated risks for lung, pancreatic, and colon cancer and encouraged to modify risk factors and adhere to site-specific population cancer screening.
Human Papillomavirus as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool in Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck Region.
Anticancer Res. 2016; 36(2):487-93 [PubMed] Related Publications
Abnormal FDG and MIBG Activity in the Bones in a Patient With Neuroblastoma Without Detectable Primary Tumor.
Clin Nucl Med. 2016; 41(8):632-3 [PubMed] Related Publications
Risk factors predictive of occult cancer detection in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.
Blood. 2016; 127(16):2035-7 [PubMed] Free Access to Full Article Related Publications