| Cancer of the Pancreas |
|
|
Pancreatic cancer is a disease in which the cells of the pancreas become malignant. The pancreas has two main functions; (i) it makes juices that help digest food and (ii) produces hormones (including insulin) that conrol how food is used and stored in the body. The vast majority of pancreatic cancers are associated with the part of the pancreas that makes digestive juices - these are known as "exocrine" pancreatic cancers. Only about 1/20 pancreatic cancers start in the hormone producing part of the pancreas ; these are known as "endocrine" pancreatic cancer or "islet cell cancer". There are several types of exocrine pancreatic cancers (based on how the cells appear under the microsope), most are classed as "ductal adenocarcinomas". Pancreatic cancer is rare before the age of 40 years, incidence increases sharply with increasing age.
Menu: Cancer of the Pancreas
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research Publications
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (Islet Cell Tumours)
Familial Pancreatic CancerInformation Patients and the Public (16 links)
- Pancreatic Cancer Treatment
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Pancreatic Cancer
Cancer Research UK
CancerHelp information is examined by both expert and lay reviewers. Content is reviewed every 12 to 18 months. Further info. - Pancreatic Cancer
Cancer.Net
Content is peer reviewed and Cancer.Net has an Editorial Board of experts and advocates. Content is reviewed annually or as needed. Further info. - Pancreatic Cancer
Macmillan Cancer Support
Content is developed by a team of information development nurses and content editors, and reviewed by health professionals. Further info. - Pancreatic Cancer
NHS Choices
NHS Choices information is quality assured by experts and content is reviewed at least every 2 years. Further info. - About Pancreatic Cancer
CancerCouncilNSW
Prof Andrew Biankin and colleagues provide a detailed introduction to pancreatic cancer. - Pancreatic Cancer UK
Pancreatic Cancer UK
A national charity providing support, information, campaigning and raising funds for research. The site includes an online forum and details of a telephone helpline. - Hirshberg Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research
Hirshberg Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research
A national, nonprofit organization, founded in 1997, dedicated to advancing pancreatic cancer research, and providing information, resources and support to pancreatic cancer patients and their families. - PANCREAS-ONC: Pancreatic Cancer Support & Information eCommunity
ACOR - Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
An advocacy organization founded by patients and families in 1999 to focus attention on the need to find the cure for pancreatic cancer. The Web site provides details of events, services and informatiion for patients and health professionals. - Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund
PCRF
A national charity, founded in 2004, dedicated to supporting research to improve diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. - Pancreatic cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief. - Pancreatica - Confronting Pancreatic Cancer
Cancer Patients Alliance
An initiative of the Cancer Patients Alliance, with input from an expert scientific board. It includes a searchable database of clinical trials, FAQs, news and research information relating to pancreatic cancer. - The Lustgarten Foundation
The Lustgarten Foundation
A charity which aims to advance the scientific and medical research related to the diagnosis, treatment, cure and prevention of pancreatic cancer. - What You Need to Know About Cancer of the Pancreas
National Cancer Institute
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (8 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Pancreatic Cancer - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Pancreatic Cancer
MeSH term: Pancreatic Neoplasms
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Pancreatic Exocrine Tumours
Patient UK
PatientUK content is peer reviewed. Content is reviewed by a team led by a Clinical Editor to reflect new or updated guidance and publications. Further info. - Management of metastatic stage 4 pancreatic cancer
http://www.hemonc101.com/
Dr Tony Talebi discusses management of metastatic pancreatic cancer with Dr Montero, University of Miami. - Pancreatic Cancer
Medscape
Detailed referenced article by Tomislav Dragovich, MD. - Pancreatic Cancer
Oncolex - Oslo University Hospital (Norway) and MD Andersen (USA)
Detailed reference article covering etiology, histology, staging, metastatic patterns, symptoms, differential diagnoses, prognosis, treatment and follow-up. - Pancreatic cancer statistics
Cancer Research UK
Statistics for the UK, including incidence, mortality, survival, risk factors and stats related to treatment and symptom relief. - Pancreatic Cancer Treatment
National Cancer Institute - SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas
SEER, National Cancer Institute
Overview and specific fact sheets on incidence and mortality, survival and stage, lifetime risk, and prevalence.
Latest Research Publications
This list of publications is regularly updated (Source: PubMed).
Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway.
Nature. 2013; 496(7443):101-5 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 04/10/2013
European proficiency study with control serum for the tumor marker CA 19-9 measured on different test systems.
Clin Lab. 2013; 59(1-2):185-92 [PubMed]
METHODS: During the one year study period, 15 laboratories applied 7 different tests and included a liquid BIOREF control serum with pancreatic carcinoma derived CA 19-9 in their routine testing and quality control procedures. The results were collected centrally and evaluated statistically.
RESULTS: The comparability of CA 19-9 results is limited especially when different tests are used, albeit, some tests show a good correlation: The CA 19-9 values obtained by different laboratories using different test systems vary up to a factor of 2. The precision of CA 19-9 determinations was acceptable in most laboratories with coefficients of variation ranging between very low 3.2% and high 17.8%. The imprecision was slightly increased when automatic dilution procedures of the analysers were used.
CONCLUSIONS: The comparability of CA 19-9 test results must be improved. The precision is acceptable in most cases. In order to monitor key performance parameters, every laboratory should participate in external quality assessment schemes and should perform a routine internal quality control with a control serum independent from the test kit manufacturer.
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: multidetector-row computed tomographic manifestations and tumor characteristics.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Mar-Apr; 37(2):125-33 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data and CT studies of 12 patients with pathologically proven ASqC of the pancreas between the dates February 2001 and February 2010 were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The presenting symptoms of ASqC of the pancreas were nonspecific. Elevated serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 12-5, and carcinoembryonic antigen were noted. The tumor was most commonly involved in the pancreatic head in 6 patients, with the dilation of the common bile duct and the upstream main pancreatic duct. All ASqCs exhibited invasive growth. No calcification and intratumoral hemorrhage were noted in ASqCs. Ten tumors showed enhancement in the early arterial phase and persistent enhancement in the portal vein phase.
CONCLUSION: The typical CT appearance of ASqC was solitary oval or round without any capsule and a defined margin. The dilation of the main pancreatic duct and/or the common bile duct was always discovered. The huge infiltrative lesion outside the pancreas was detected in the tail and/or the body of the pancreas. Not only the elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is common, but also Ca12-5 and CEA, whereas human alpha fetoprotein elevation is not observed. The enhancement pattern of tumor showed persistence in the portal vein phase.
Role of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor.
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec; 16(4):552-8 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 04/10/2013
METHODS: In a single-center study, we screened all adult patients undergoing a laparoscopic DP for SPT. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analysed and compared to the results of open DP for SPT published in the medical literature.
RESULTS: From April 2000 to June 2010, 5 adult female patients (median age 34 y) underwent a laparoscopic DP for an SPT. No conversion to open surgery was required. The median size of the tumor was 45 mm. The postoperative mortality rate was 0%, and serious complications (Dindo IV) occurred in 2 patients. The postoperative quality of life was not significantly altered by the laparoscopic procedure. At a median follow-up of 60 mo, all patients were alive and without evidence of local recurrence, distant metastasis, diabetes, or exocrine insufficiency.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy may offer an alternative to open surgery in the treatment of SPT of the distal pancreas in adult female patients. The laparoscopic procedure impacts neither the oncologic outcome nor the quality of life. However, due to the risk of postoperative complications, this procedure should be reserved for specialized centers.
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec; 16(4):549-51 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 04/10/2013
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent open distal pancreatectomies (ODPs) and LDPs between August 2001 and June 2008. Data included type of surgery, open versus laparoscopy, demographics, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, histopathologic diagnosis, postoperative complications, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and mortality.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with pancreatic masses underwent distal pancreatic resection during the study period. Fifty-nine percent (n = 16) underwent LDP, and 41% (n = 11) underwent ODP. Mean patient age was 66 y (range, 40 to 86) for the LDP group and 62 (range, 40 to 84) for the ODP group. Mean operative time was 231 min (range, 195 to 305) for LDP and 240 (range, 150 to 210) for the ODP technique. Mean length of stay for LDP and ODP was 8 (range, 3 to 22) and 12 d (range, 5 to 2), respectively. Morbidity was 25% (n = 4) in the LDP group and 36% (n = 4) in the ODP group. None of the differences between the LDP and ODP groups were statistically significant. No mortalities occurred in either group.
CONCLUSION: This study supports the idea that LDP can be safely and effectively performed by any surgeon comfortable with basic laparoscopy and may not require specialized training or a specialized center. Further data are required to make more definitive conclusions.
Inhibition of AKT in human pancreatic, renal and colorectal cancer cells by four cardiac hormones.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(3):785-90 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cardiac hormones were examined for their ability to inhibit AKT, measured with a solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in human colorectal, pancreatic, and renal cancer cells.
RESULTS: Vessel dilator, kaliuretic peptide, ANP, and LANP maximally reduced the concentration of AKT by 47%, 45%, 52%, and 46% in human colorectal cancer cells (p<0.0001), by 60%, 61%, 64%, and 59% in human pancreatic carcinoma cells (p<0.0001), and by 31%, 32%, 31%, and 31% in renal adenocarcinoma cells (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: These four cardiac hormones are significant inhibitors of AKT in human cancer cells, as part of their anticancer mechanism(s) of action.
Safety and effectiveness of vessel sealing for dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Am Surg. 2013; 79(3):290-5 [PubMed]
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with cystlike changes: evaluation with MDCT.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(3):W283-90 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical records, images, and pathologic reports of 74 consecutive patients (average age, 55.5 years) with surgically resected pancreatic NETs who underwent preoperative CT were retrospectively reviewed. The size and location of the pancreatic NETs were recorded. The tumors were classified on the basis of CT appearance as small (≤ 3 cm) or large (> 3 cm) and as solid, partially (≤ 50% or > 50%) cystic, or purely (≈ 100%) cystic. Peripheral contrast enhancement on CT was characterized, and lymph node and liver metastases found by pathologic examination were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 78 pancreatic NETs were reviewed. Five were not visualized on CT, leaving 73 pancreatic NETs in 69 patients (multiple tumors were visualized on CT of three patients) for analysis. The mean size of the 73 tumors was 3.0 ± 2.6 (SD) cm (range, 0.7-13.1 cm); 52 tumors were 3 cm or smaller and 21 tumors were larger than 3 cm. Gross pathologic results confirmed that 13 of the 73 (17.8%) tumors were predominantly (> 50% or ≈ 100%) cystic: 10 of the 52 (19.2%) tumors 3 cm or smaller and three of the 21 (14.3%) tumors larger than 3 cm. Peripheral contrast enhancement was seen in 11 of the 13 (85%) predominantly cystic pancreatic NETs. Compared with solid pancreatic NETs, predominantly cystic pancreatic NETs were less commonly associated with lymph node and liver metastases.
CONCLUSION: Cystic pancreatic NETs are not rare and should be included in the differential diagnosis of a cystic pancreatic mass, particularly if the cystic mass is associated with peripheral contrast enhancement. A minority of cystic pancreatic NETs can present with no peripheral enhancement.
Histopathologic findings of multifocal pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms on CT.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(3):563-9 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CT scans of all patients with a pathologically proven IPMN at our institution were reviewed, and a total of 52 patients with four or more pancreatic cysts were found. Each case was reviewed for the number of cysts and the presence of signs of invasive malignancy including a coexistent solid pancreatic mass, pancreatic ductal dilatation, and mural nodularity.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (19 men, 33 women; mean age, 71.8 years) were found to have multifocal IPMNs, defined as four or more cysts, on CT. Of these 52 patients, nine also had evidence of a solid pancreatic mass on CT. Retrospective review of the pathologic results for the remaining 43 patients (17 men, 26 women; mean age, 71.76 years) showed 18 cases of an IPMN with either high-grade dysplasia or a coexistent invasive carcinoma. Most important, 37% (7/19 patients) had no CT findings of an invasive malignancy according to the Sendai criteria (i.e., cysts ≥ 3 cm in the axial plane, main pancreatic ductal dilatation ≥ 6 mm, or mural nodularity within a cyst) but were found to have an IPMN with either high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. When the pancreas contained 10 or more cysts, high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma tended to be more likely than low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia (odds ratio, 3.83; 95% CI, 0.87-16.8; p = 0.075).
CONCLUSION: The presence of multiple pancreatic cysts should be looked on with suspicion, particularly when there are a large number of cysts, even when none of the cysts individually meet the imaging criteria for resection according to the Sendai consensus recommendations. At the very least, these patients need to be followed very closely.
Everolimus in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the clinical experience.
Cancer Res. 2013; 73(5):1449-53 [PubMed]
Phase II randomised proof-of-concept study of the urokinase inhibitor upamostat (WX-671) in combination with gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with non-resectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(4):766-70 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 05/03/2014
Strengthened glycolysis under hypoxia supports tumor symbiosis and hexosamine biosynthesis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(10):3919-24 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 05/03/2014
Is it necessary to follow patients after resection of a benign pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm?
J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(4):657-65; discussion 665-7 [PubMed]
STUDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty patients with more than 1 year of follow-up after resection were included in this analysis.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 38 months, 22 (17%) developed imaging evidence of a new or progressive IPMN. Eleven (8%) underwent completion resection. Three of the 11 patients had invasive adenocarcinoma. Two other patients developed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and did not undergo resection. All 5 patients (4%) with cancer had negative margins at initial operation. Sixteen of 100 patients (16%) with negative margins for IPMN at the initial operation developed a new IPMN vs 6 of 30 patients (20%) with margins positive for IPMN (p = ns). Five of 22 patients (23%) with a new IPMN had a family history of pancreatic cancer, while 8 of 108 patients (7%) without a new IPMN had a family history (p < 0.05). Overall, the chances of developing a new IPMN at 1, 5, and 10 years after the initial surgery were 4%, 25%, and 62%, respectively, and of requiring surgery were 1.6%, 14%, and 18%, respectively. The estimated chances of developing invasive pancreatic cancer were 0%, 7%, and 38% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone resection for noninvasive IPMN require indefinite close surveillance because of the risks of developing a new IPMN, of requiring surgery, and of developing cancer. A family history of pancreatic cancer, but not margin status or degree of dysplasia, is associated with a risk of development of a new or progressive IPMN.
Phase II trial of erlotinib plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (XELTA study).
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(2):717-23 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, uncontrolled, phase II trial. Patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer received oral capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, of a 21-day treatment cycle; and oral erlotinib at 150 mg daily.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled. The overall response rate (ORR) was 6%, with a median time to treatment failure of 2.1 months. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months and median overall survival was 4.3 months. The one-year survival rate was 22%. Major grade 1 and 2 non-hematological toxicities were skin rash (34%), asthenia (31%) and diarrhea (31%). Grade 3 hematological toxicity was <13%. No grade 4 toxicities were detected. None of the patients died due to treatment toxicity.
CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine with erlotinib is an active regimen with a favorable safety profile for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic resection for metastatic melanoma originating from the nasal cavity: a case report and literature review.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(2):567-73 [PubMed]
VEGF-C ShRNA inhibits pancreatic cancer growth and lymphangiogenesis in an orthotopic fluorescent nude mouse model.
Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(2):409-17 [PubMed]
Systemic therapy for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Semin Oncol. 2013; 40(1):75-83 [PubMed]
Update on the role of somatostatin analogs for the treatment of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Semin Oncol. 2013; 40(1):56-68 [PubMed]
Up-regulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 by small activating RNA inhibits the in vitro and in vivo growth of pancreatic cancer cells.
Tumori. 2012; 98(6):804-11 [PubMed]
METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A dsRNA (dsP21) targeting the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene promoter at position-322 relative to the transcription start site was transfected into PANC-1 cells. Expression of mRNA and protein was evaluated by semiquantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. Proliferation of PANC-1 cells was measured by the MTT method, and the apoptosis rate was detected by flow cytometry. PANC-1 cells were transplanted subcutaneously in nude mice, and the inhibitory effect of dsP21 on tumor growth was observed.
RESULTS: The introduction of dsP21 was shown to efficiently up-regulate expression of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene in PANC-1 cells according to the results of RT-PCR and Western blotting (P <0.01, compared with controls). The inhibitory effect on cell proliferation was confirmed by the MTT test (P <0.05, compared with controls). The apoptosis rate of PANC-1 cells treated with dsP21 was significantly higher than that of the control cells (P <0.01). Our experimental data showed that dsP21-mediated up-regulation of p21 expression exerted an apparent growth inhibitory effect on PANC-1 cells in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS: dsP21 targeting the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene promoter can specifically up-regulate expression of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene in PANC-1 cells. It therefore has a substantially inhibitory effect on cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and can be used as a new method and material for the gene therapy of pancreatic cancer.
Prognosis of minimally invasive carcinoma arising in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(4):601-5 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/04/2014
Immune cell infiltration as an indicator of the immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(4):914-23 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 05/03/2014
Pharmacological ascorbate with gemcitabine for the control of metastatic and node-positive pancreatic cancer (PACMAN): results from a phase I clinical trial.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013; 71(3):765-75 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/03/2014
DESIGN: Nine subjects received twice-weekly intravenous ascorbate (15-125 g) employing Simon's accelerated titration design to achieve a targeted post-infusion plasma level of ≥350 mg/dL (≥20 mM). Subjects received concurrent gemcitabine. Disease burden, weight, performance status, hematologic and metabolic laboratories, time to progression and overall survival were monitored.
RESULTS: Mean plasma ascorbate trough levels were significantly higher than baseline (1.46 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.09 mg/dL, i.e., 83 vs. 44 μM, p < 0.001). Adverse events attributable to the drug combination were rare and included diarrhea (n = 4) and dry mouth (n = 6). Dose-limiting criteria were not met for this study. Mean survival of subjects completing at least two cycles (8 weeks) of therapy was 13 ± 2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest pharmacologic ascorbate administered concurrently with gemcitabine is well tolerated. Initial data from this small sampling suggest some efficacy. Further studies powered to determine efficacy should be conducted.
Spontaneous rupture of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas during pregnancy.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121(2 Pt 2 Suppl 1):486-8 [PubMed]
CASE: At 19 weeks of gestation, a 29-year-old woman presented with a pancreatic mass and upper abdominal pain radiating to the back. On the third day of admission, shock and peritoneal signs developed. Exploratory laparotomy and subsequent subtotal pancreatectomy were performed for a bleeding tumor. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm was confirmed by pathological examination. The patient delivered a healthy full-term girl vaginally. Eight months postoperatively, the clinical courses of both mother and infant have been uneventful.
CONCLUSION: Ruptured solid pseudopapillary neoplasms can cause an acute abdomen during pregnancy. The expression of progesterone receptors in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm is a possible cause of this potentially devastating event.
Islet-1 is a sensitive but not entirely specific marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and their metastases.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(3):399-405 [PubMed]
Incidental neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: MDCT findings and features of malignancy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(2):355-62 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 60 histologically verified pancreatic NETs incidentally detected with contrast-enhanced MDCT were included. Various MDCT features such as size, morphology, enhancement, and presence of calcifications were evaluated and were correlated with tumor biology on histopathology. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for MDCT features in predicting nonbenign biology and risk of recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 32 of 60 (53%) NETs were nonbenign: most were large (mean, 29.1 mm) with a solid or complex pattern. NET size of 3 cm or larger yielded a positive predictive value of 61% for nonbenign tumors and 100% when calcification was present. In 12 patients with recurrence, 92% of NETs were nonbenign. The presence of calcification, local invasion, main pancreatic duct dilatation, vascular invasion, and lymph node enlargement along with angioinvasion and a Ki-67 index greater than 2% on histology were associated with a nonbenign diagnosis and a higher risk of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of incidental NETs show uncertain or malignant behavior. Solid tumors 3 cm or larger are commonly nonbenign; however, about 30% of tumors smaller than that size cutoff can be malignant. Nonbenign tumors and those with invasive features on MDCT have a higher incidence of recurrence.
Diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic lesions.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(2):343-54 [PubMed]
CONCLUSION: The guidelines are as follows: Annual imaging surveillance is generally sufficient for benign serous cystadenomas smaller than 4 cm and for asymptomatic lesions. Asymptomatic thin-walled unilocular cystic lesions smaller than 3 cm or side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms should be followed up with CT or MRI at 6 and 12 months interval after detection. Cystic lesions with more complex features or with growth rates greater than 1 cm/year should be followed more closely or recommended for resection if the patient's condition allows surgery. Symptomatic cystic lesions, neoplasms with high malignant potential, and lesions larger than 3 cm should be referred for surgical evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy can be used preoperatively to assess the risk of malignancy.
Randomized phase III multi-institutional study of TNFerade biologic with fluorouracil and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: final results.
J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(7):886-94 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 304 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to standard of care plus TNFerade (SOC + TNFerade) versus standard of care alone (SOC). SOC consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2) per day continuous infusion). TNFerade was injected intratumorally before the first fraction of radiotherapy each week at a dose of 4 × 10(11) particle units by using either a percutaneous transabdominal or an endoscopic ultrasound approach. Four weeks after chemoradiotherapy, patients began gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously) with or without erlotinib (100 to 150 mg per day orally) until progression or toxicity.
RESULTS: The analysis included 187 patients randomly assigned to SOC + TNFerade and 90 to SOC by using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (range, 0.1 to 50.5 months). Median survival was 10.0 months for patients in both the SOC + TNFerade and SOC arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.22; P = .26). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months for SOC + TNFerade versus 7.0 months for SOC (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = .51). Among patients treated on the SOC + TNFerade arm, multivariate analysis showed that TNFerade injection by an endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric/transduodenal approach rather than a percutaneous transabdominal approach was a risk factor for inferior PFS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.06; P = .032). The patients in the SOC + TNFerade arm experienced more grade 1 to 2 fever and chills than those in the SOC arm (P < .001) but both arms had similar rates of grade 3 to 4 toxicities (all P > .05).
CONCLUSION: SOC + TNFerade is safe but not effective for prolonging survival in patients with LAPC.
Synergistic anticancer activity of HS-173, a novel PI3K inhibitor in combination with Sorafenib against pancreatic cancer cells.
Cancer Lett. 2013; 331(2):250-61 [PubMed]
A rare case of direct tumor extension to the right ventricle.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 95(2):706-7 [PubMed]
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
