| Secondary Bone Cancer (bone metastasis) |
|
|
Secondary bone cancer is where malignant cells have spread to the bones from other parts of the body. This is different to cancer that actually started in the bones (primary bone cancer). Virtually all types of cancer can spread to bone. Bone metastases are particularly common in people with breast, lung or prostate cancer. Bone metastases are usually multiple, they cause pain and can can lead to other symptoms such as hypercalcemia (abnormally high levels of calcium in the blood).
Menu: Secondary Bone Cancer (bone metastasis)
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research Publications
Bone CancerInformation Patients and the Public (12 links)
- Pain control for bone cancer
Cancer Research UK
CancerHelp information is examined by both expert and lay reviewers. Content is reviewed every 12 to 18 months. Further info.
Covers how bone cancer causes pain, radiotherapy for bone pain, painkillers and other drugs. - Secondary bone cancer
Macmillan Cancer Support
Content is developed by a team of information development nurses and content editors, and reviewed by health professionals. Further info. - Bone Metastasis
American Cancer Society
Detailed questions and answers, with references. - Bone metastasis
Mayo Clinic
Detailed guide (see Basics and In-Depth tabs) covers symptoms, risk factors, preparing for an appointment, tests and diagnosis, treatments and drugs, and coping. - Bone Metastasis
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Covers symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, other conditions causing similar symptoms and a glossary of terms related to bone metastasis. - Bone metastasis: secondary illness, primary concern
Nursing Times
Article by Ursula O'Leary, RN (2001). Covers mechanisms of spread, effects - pain, hypercalcaemia, anaemia, Spinal cord compression, and pathological fracture. - Impact of Bone Metastases on the Skeleton
Amgen - Metastatic Bone Disease
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Detailed article with images, covering MSD, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment options, non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment. - Metastatic bone lesions (pathological fractures)
OrthopaedicsOne
Article by Jesse Torbert. - Metastatic bone tumor fundamentals
Cleveland Clinic - Translate this page
Short article covering symptoms, treatment and before and after surgery. - Metastatic Cancer
National Cancer Institute
Fact sheet in the form of questions and answers, including how does cancer spread? - The Biology of Metastatic Bone Disease
Amgen
An exploration of how cancer spreads to bone and the three different classifications of bone metastases.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (3 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Bone Cancer (secondary) - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Bone Cancer (secondary)
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Metastatic Bone Disease
Medscape
Detailed referenced article by Howard A Chansky, MD. Covers diagnosis, workup, treatment and prognosis. - Metastatic Breast Cancer
BoneTumour.org
Bone is the most common site of recurrence of breast cancer. Breast cancer is the most common site of origin of metastatic deposits in the skeleton....
Latest Research Publications
This list of publications is regularly updated (Source: PubMed).
Can hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) produce unconventional metastases? Four cases of extrahepatic HCC.
Tumori. 2013 Jan-Feb; 99(1):e19-23 [PubMed]
METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: We present four unusual cases of extrahepatic metastasis from HCC: the first concerns a patient who underwent a liver transplantation for HCC with cirrhosis and three years later developed metastases in the lung and the left orbit; the second is that of a patient who developed an extraperitoneal pararectal metastasis; in the third case a large osteolytic lesion developed on the left iliac bone, and in the fourth case we found an isolated metastasis in the left mandible.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: These cases offer important information related to the unusual biology of isolated metastases from HCC after successful treatment of the primary cancer.
Metastatic bone disease in the era of bone-targeted therapy: clinical impact.
Tumori. 2013 Jan-Feb; 99(1):1-9 [PubMed]
Metaplastic breast cancer: a presentation of two cases and a review of the literature.
Tenn Med. 2013; 106(2):39-41 [PubMed]
Vesselplasty: a new minimally invasive approach to treat pathological vertebral fractures in selected tumor patients - preliminary results.
Rofo. 2013; 185(4):340-50 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven pathological vertebral fractures in nine patients were treated with vesselplasty (Vessel-X®, MAXXSPINE). Nine of eleven vertebras (81.8 %) had major posterior wall deficiency (> 30 %). Clinical and radiological (CT) measures were obtained before and 3 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: The mean VAS improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative (6.9 ± 2.2 to 3.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.05), as did the ODI (59.7 %± 19.2 % to 40.3 %± 24.0 %; p < 0.05). The physical component summary of the SF-36 was significantly improved by the operation (19.2 ± 8.0 to 31.0 ± 16.5; p < 0.05). Symptomatic cement leakage or other operation-associated complications were not observed. Three patients were primarily treated with concomitant minimally invasive stabilization via fixateur interne. One patient had to undergo minimally invasive stabilization via fixateur interne 4 months after vesselplasty due to further collapse of the treated vertebral body.
CONCLUSION: From these preliminary results, vesselplasty appears to be a treatment option worth considering in pathological vertebral fractures, even in the case of posterior wall deficiency. Selected tumor patients might benefit from vesselplasty as a minimally invasive procedure for stabilization of the fractured vertebra, pain control, and improvement in body function and quality of life. Long-term prospective studies with a larger sample size are required to validate these results.
Cancer-induced bone disease.
Nurs Stand. 2013 Jan 9-15; 27(19):48-56; quiz 57 [PubMed]
Surgical resection of a metastatic skull tumor from lung cancer.
Tumori. 2012; 98(6):169e-71e [PubMed]
Prostate-specific antigen-negative prostate cancer recurrence?
Urology. 2013; 81(2):e17-8 [PubMed]
The Oswestry Risk Index: an aid in the treatment of metastatic disease of the spine.
Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(2):210-6 [PubMed]
Expression of osteoprotegerin from a replicating adenovirus inhibits the progression of prostate cancer bone metastases in a murine model.
Lab Invest. 2013; 93(3):268-78 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/09/2013
Local disease control for spinal metastases following "separation surgery" and adjuvant hypofractionated or high-dose single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: outcome analysis in 186 patients.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 18(3):207-14 [PubMed]
METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 186 patients with ESCC from spinal metastases who were treated with surgical decompression, instrumentation, and postoperative radiation delivered as either single-fraction SRS (24 Gy) in 40 patients (21.5%), high-dose hypofractionated SRS (24-30 Gy in 3 fractions) in 37 patients (19.9%), or low-dose hypofractionated SRS (18-36 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions) in 109 patients (58.6%). The relationships between postoperative adjuvant SRS dosing and fractionation, patient characteristics, tumor histology-specific radiosensitivity, grade of ESCC, extent of surgical decompression, response to preoperative radiotherapy, and local tumor control were evaluated by competing risks analysis.
RESULTS: The total cumulative incidence of local progression was 16.4% 1 year after SRS. Multivariate Gray competing risks analysis revealed a significant improvement in local control with high-dose hypofractionated SRS (4.1% cumulative incidence of local progression at 1 year, HR 0.12, p = 0.04) as compared with low-dose hypofractionated SRS (22.6% local progression at 1 year, HR 1). Although univariate analysis demonstrated a trend toward greater risk of local progression for patients in whom preoperative conventional external beam radiation therapy failed (22.2% local progression at 1 year, HR 1.96, p = 0.07) compared with patients who did not receive any preoperative radiotherapy (11.2% local progression at 1 year, HR 1), this association was not confirmed with multivariate analysis. No other variable significantly correlated with progression-free survival, including radiation sensitivity of tumor histology, grade of ESCC, extent of surgical decompression, or patient sex.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative adjuvant SRS following epidural spinal cord decompression and instrumentation is a safe and effective strategy for establishing durable local tumor control regardless of tumor histology-specific radiosensitivity. Patients who received high-dose hypofractionated SRS demonstrated 1-year local progression rates of less than 5% (95% CI 0%-12.2%), which were superior to the results of low-dose hypofractionated SRS. The local progression rate after single-fraction SRS was less than 10% (95% CI 0%-19.0%).
Surgical management of spinal metastases: the postoperative quality of life.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95 Suppl 9:S87-94 [PubMed]
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Fifty-two patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases during October 2007 to October 2009 were prospectively evaluated. Surgical intervention included neurological decompression,fusion and spinal instrumentation. Pre- and post-operative assessments at 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month were performed using a visual analog scale, the modified Frankel grade classification and a Shortform-36 (SF-36).
RESULTS: Pain scores were improved significantly at all post-operative time points (p < 0.001). The neurological functions were improved at 1st month (p < 0.001), 3rd month (p < 0.001) and 6th month (p = 0.260) postoperatively. At 1st month after surgery, 40 patients (76.9%) had improvement in quality of life. However, at 3rd month postoperatively, there were 31 patients (59.6%) improved. At 6th month postoperatively, only 15 patients (28.8%) were improved. Internal organ metastases was the only factor that related to the reduction of quality of life at 1 month, 3rd month (p < 0.001) and 6th month (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patients with spinal metastases will have benefit from palliative surgery in significant pain reduction and neurological recovery. As the global assessment in the quality of life, the patients may have the improvement at 1st month postoperatively but after 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, selected patients may have benefit from the surgery and the factors such as internal organ metastases and primary site of cancer have great effects on the improvement in the quality of life. This data may be useful for counseling the patients and relatives about the prognosis and expected surgical outcome before surgical intervention is decided.
Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3.
Blood. 2013; 121(10):1819-23 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 07/03/2014
Assessing the relation between bone marrow signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion-weighted MRI.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(1):163-70 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluations of 16 patients without bone disease, 21 patients with untreated metastases of breast cancer, and 12 patients with myeloma undergoing body diffusion-weighted MRI were performed (b values, 50 s/mm(2) and 800 or 900 s/mm(2)). Normal yellow and red bone marrow regions were compared with metastatic breast and myeloma bone marrow lesions (one to five regions of interest per patient). SI values were normalized to kidney, muscle, and spinal cord SI. Signal-to-noise ratio and ADC for each lesion were recorded. Nonparametric, receiver operating characteristic, and nonlinear regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Yellow bone marrow and red bone marrow ADC values were lower than the tumor values (p < 0.001; area under the curve, 0.94; cutoff, 774 μm(2)/s). Tissue-normalized SI and the signal-to-noise ratio of normal bone marrow were also lower than those in tumor regions (p < 0.001; area under the curve, 0.86-0.88). Second-order polynomial curve fitting between SI and ADC was observed (muscle normalized SI, R(2) = 0.4). The 95th percentile and maximum values for mean tumor ADC distribution were 1209 μm(2)/s and 1433 μm(2)/s.
CONCLUSION: Both tissue-normalized SI and ADC measurements allow differentiation between normal bone marrow and tumors of myeloma and breast cancer. The presence of a nonlinear relation between bone marrow SI and ADC values enables definition of an upper limit of ADC value for untreated myeloma lesions and metastatic lesions of breast cancer.
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells function as novel osteoclast progenitors enhancing bone loss in breast cancer.
Cancer Res. 2013; 73(2):672-82 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/01/2014
Solitary sternal metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 16(14):1947-50 [PubMed]
Collecting duct carcinoma presenting uncommon metastatic features.
Tumori. 2012 Sep-Oct; 98(5):135e-138e [PubMed]
Overexpression of CD9 in human breast cancer cells promotes the development of bone metastases.
Anticancer Res. 2012; 32(12):5211-20 [PubMed]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overexpression of CD9 was analyzed by immunoblotting in different cell lines. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess CD9 expression in primary tumors and metastatic lesions. In vivo experiments were conducted in mice using a monoclonal antibody against CD9.
RESULTS: CD9 overexpression was confirmed in osteotropic cells. CD9 was significantly overexpressed in bone metastases versus primary tumors and visceral metastatic lesions. Finally, in vivo experiments showed that an antibody against CD9 delays homing of B02 cells in bone marrow, slowing down bone destruction.
CONCLUSION: Our study reveals a potential implication of CD9 in the formation of bony metastases from breast cancer cells.
DKK2 mediates osteolysis, invasiveness, and metastatic spread in Ewing sarcoma.
Cancer Res. 2013; 73(2):967-77 [PubMed]
Vitamin D deficiency in oncology patients--an ignored condition: impact on hypocalcemia and quality of life.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2012; 14(10):607-12 [PubMed]
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of vitamin D status on risk of hypocalcemia and quality of life in these patients.
METHODS: We performed laboratory tests for routine serum biochemistry, 25(OH)D, plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone turnover markers (CTX, P1NP) in 54 patients aged 57.5 +/- 13 years treated with intravenous bisphosphonates.
RESULTS: Most of the patients (n = 44, 77.8%) did not receive calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Their mean serum 25(OH)D levels (12.83 +/- 6.86 ng/ml) correlated with vitamin D daily intake (P = 0.002). In 53 patients (98.1%) 25(OH) D levels were suboptimal (< 30 ng/ml). Albumin-corrected calcium levels correlated with plasma PTH (P = 0.001). No correlation was observed between daily calcium intake and serum calcium (P = 0.45). Hypocalcemia was observed in one patient. Mean plasma PTH was 88.5 - 65 ng/L. Plasma PTH correlated negatively with 25(OH)D serum levels (P = 0.003) and positively with P1NP (P = 0.004). Albumin-corrected calcium correlated negatively with P1NP (mean 126.9 +/- 191 ng/ml) but not with CTX levels (mean 0.265 +/- 0.1 ng/ml) (P < 0.001). There was no correlation among quality of life parameters, yearly sun exposure and 25(OH)D levels (P = 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is frequent in oncology patients with bone metastasis treated with bisphosphonates and might increase bone damage. Our results indicate a minor risk for the development of severe hypocalcemia in vitamin D-deficient patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy. Although vitamin D deficiency might have some effect on the quality of life in these patients, it was not proven significant.
Calcaneal metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: a case report and a review of the literature.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012; 33(5):524-5 [PubMed]
Inhibition of breast cancer metastases by a novel inhibitor of TGFβ receptor 1.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105(1):47-58 [PubMed]
METHODS: To identify specific inhibitors of TGFβ receptor 1 (TGFβR1) in breast cancer metastasis, a virtual library of more than 400000 different compounds was screened by molecular docking modeling and confirmed with Smad-binding element luciferase and TGFβR1 kinase assays. Affymetrix GeneChip expression analysis of mRNA levels and real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed to determine expression changes of TGFβ-mediated, metastasis-associated genes in breast cancer cells after treatment with the small-molecule inhibitor YR-290. YR-290 was also examined for its effects on breast cancer migration, invasion, and metastasis using transwell and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) assays in vitro and three different mouse (BALB/c and NU/NU nude) models (n = 10 per group). Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess survival. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: YR-290 interacted with the kinase domain of TGFβR1, abrogated kinase activity (half maximal inhibitory concentration = 137nM, 95% confidence interval = 126.4 to 147.6nM) and inhibited the TGFβ-mediated downstream signaling pathway and metastasis-associated genes in breast cancer cells. YR-290 inhibited TGFβ-modulated breast cancer cell migration and invasion. In tumor metastasis mouse models, YR-290 almost completely blocked cancer metastasis. Numbers of lung tumor nodules of mice treated with 1mg/kg and 5mg/kg YR-290 were reduced by 74.93% (95% confidence interval = 61.45% to 88.41%) and 94.93% (95% confidence interval = 82.13% to 100%), respectively, compared with control mice. Treatment with YR-290 also statistically significantly prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice.
CONCLUSIONS: YR-290 is a novel inhibitor of tumor metastasis that works by blocking TGFβ signaling pathways.
Bone-modifying agents as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2012; 26(10):955-62 [PubMed]
An approach for the identification of targets specific to bone metastasis using cancer genes interactome and gene ontology analysis.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49401 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/01/2014
Definition of molecular determinants of prostate cancer cell bone extravasation.
Cancer Res. 2013; 73(2):942-52 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/01/2014
miR-326 associates with biochemical markers of bone turnover in lung cancer bone metastasis.
Bone. 2013; 52(1):532-9 [PubMed]
Effect of abiraterone acetate and prednisone compared with placebo and prednisone on pain control and skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: exploratory analysis of data from the COU-AA-301 randomised trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(12):1210-7 [PubMed]
METHODS: The COU-AA-301 trial enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in whom one or two lines of chemotherapy (one docetaxel based) had been unsuccessful and who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses of 2 or less. Pain intensity and interference of pain with daily activities were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaire at baseline, day 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of each treatment cycle thereafter until discontinuation. We assessed, with prospectively defined response criteria that incorporated analgesic use, clinically meaningful changes in pain intensity and interference with daily living. We measured time to first occurrence of skeletal-related events, which we defined as pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or bone surgery, and regularly assessed them throughout the study. Pain palliation was assessed in patients who had clinically significant baseline pain, whereas all other analyses were done in the overall intention-to-treat population. COU-AA-301 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00638690.
FINDINGS: Median follow-up was 20·2 months (IQR 18·4-22·1). In patients with clinically significant pain at baseline, abiraterone acetate and prednisone resulted in significantly more palliation (157 of 349 [45·0%] patients vs 47 of 163 [28·8%]; p=0·0005) and faster palliation (median time to palliation 5·6 months [95% CI 3·7-9·2] vs 13·7 months [5·4-not estimable]; p=0·0018) of pain intensity than did prednisone only. Palliation of pain interference (134 of 223 [60·1%] vs 38 of 100 [38·0%], p=0·0002; median time to palliation of pain interference 1·0 months [95% CI 0·9-1·9] vs 3·7 months [2·7-not estimable], p=0·0004) and median duration of palliation of pain intensity (4·2 months [95% CI 3·0-4·9] vs 2·1 months [1·4-3·7]; p=0·0056) were significantly better with abiraterone acetate and prednisone than with prednisone only. In the overall population, median time to occurrence of first skeletal-related event was significantly longer with abiraterone acetate and prednisone than with prednisone only (25·0 months [95% CI 25·0-not estimable] vs 20·3 months [16·9-not estimable]; p=0·0001).
INTERPRETATION: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel, abiraterone acetate and prednisone offer significant benefits compared with prednisone alone in terms of pain relief, delayed pain progression, and prevention of skeletal-related events.
FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development and Janssen Global Services.
A validated survival score for breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013; 189(1):41-6 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 510 patients, one half were assigned to either the test or the validation group. In the test group, eight pretreatment factors (age, performance status, number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, time of developing motor deficits) plus the radiation regimen were retrospectively investigated. Factors significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis were included in the scoring system. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (%) by ten. The total score was the sum of the scores for each factor.
RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis of the test group, performance status, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, and time of developing motor deficits were significant for survival and included in the score. Total scores ranged from 30 to 50 points. In the test group, the 6-month survival rates were 12% for 30-35 points, 41% for 36-40 points, 74% for 41-45 points, and 98% for 46-50 points (p < 0.0001). In the validation group, the 6-month survival rates were 14%, 46%, 77%, and 99%, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The survival rates of the validation group were similar to the test group. Therefore, this score was reproducible and can help when selecting the appropriate radiotherapy regimen for each patient taking into account her survival prognosis.
Metastatic disease around the hip: maintaining quality of life.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(11 Suppl A):22-5 [PubMed]
Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases.
Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(10):1665-71 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 06/11/2013
METHODS: Retrospective study on all the renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastases treated with sunitinib or sorafenib between November 2005 and June 2012 at the University Hospitals Leuven and AZ Groeninge in Kortrijk.
RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included in the outcome analysis: 49 treated with concomitant bisphosphonates, 27 with TKI alone. Both groups were well balanced in terms of prognostic and predictive markers. Response rate (38% vs 16% partial responses, P=0.028), median progression-free survival (7.0 vs 4.0 months, P=0.0011) and median overall survival (17.0 vs 7.0 months, P=0.022) were significantly better in patients receiving bisphosphonates. The incidence of ONJ was 10% in patients treated with TKI and bisphosphonates.
CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of bisphosphonates and TKI in renal cell carcinoma patients with bone involvement probably improves treatment efficacy, to be confirmed by prospective studies, but is associated with a high incidence of ONJ.
Ophthalmic manifestation of skull base metastasis from breast cancer.
Med Sci Monit. 2012; 18(11):CS105-8 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 06/11/2013
CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 53-year-old woman complaining of ptosis and diplopia, with concomitant loss of skin sensation within the right half of the forehead, and without any other worrisome symptoms or signs. Ophthalmic examination revealed impairment in eye movements, slight proptosis and corneal hypoesthesia on the right side, with normal pupillary light reflexes. The anterior and posterior segments of the eye were normal. Based on CT and MRI, an extensive tumor was detected, infiltrating the right orbit and the frontotemporal region of the skull base, and producing edema of the adjacent aspects of the brain. Aside from partial palsy of the oculomotor nerve and the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve, no abnormalities were found on neurological examination. Explorative craniotomy and histopathological findings revealed a skull base metastasis from breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Diplopia, ptosis, proptosis, and ophthalmic nerve sensory loss may be the only manifestation of a skull base metastasis. Careful ophthalmologic examination is crucial in early detection of this life-threatening condition.
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
