| Familial Breast Cancer |
|
|
There is a growing body of research into genetic factors in breast cancer. In particular about 5% of women with breast cancer have an abnormality of the BRCA1 gene which is localised to chromosome 17q21. In women who inherit this altered gene have a highly increased risk of developing breast cancer, and tend to develop breast cancer at younger age. BRCA1 gene mutation has also been linked to an increased risk for ovarian cancer. Similarly, another gene - BRCA2 which is localised to chromosome 13q12-13 also gives a higher risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Menu: Familial Breast Cancer
Information for Patients and the Public
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers
Latest Research Publications
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Genetics (Cancer GeneticsWeb)
BRCA2 gene (13q12.3)
BRCAI gene (17q21)Information Patients and the Public (9 links)
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Cancer.Net
Content is peer reviewed and Cancer.Net has an Editorial Board of experts and advocates. Content is reviewed annually or as needed. Further info. - Inherited Breast Cancer Concerns
Johns Hopkins Medical Institute
Medical Oncologist and Co-Director of the Johns Hopkins Breast and Ovarian Surveillance Service (BOSS) Dr. Kala Visvanathan discusses cancer as a family disease, who may be a good candidate for genetic testing, how testing is done, and what individuals need to know if they test positive for a genetic mutation. - BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing
National Cancer Institute
Detailed fact sheet, with references. - Hereditary breast cancer
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).
Breast cancer expert, Robert Carlson, MD, of the Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center, explains hereditary breast cancer. - Breast cancer in families
Breast Cancer Care
Overview of breast cancer in families and levels of risk. - FORCE (Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered)
FORCE
A national non-profit dedicated to improving the lives of individuals and families affected by hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. - OPERA (Online Personal Education and Risk Assessment)
Macmillan Cancer Support
An online information tool for people concerned about their inherited risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer. It is based on UK national guidelines. - Penn II BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Risk Evaluation Model
University of Pennsylvania
"This model can be used to predict the pre-test probability, or prior probability, that a person has a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In general, individuals with at least a 5-10% chance of having a mutation in either gene are considered good candidates for genetic testing. This model does not predict breast cancer risk. It focuses only on the chance that an individual has inherited a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2." - Sister Study
Sister Study
A long-term study of women ages 35-74 who have never had breast cancer themselves but whose biological sister was diagnosed with the disease. It is a national study to learn how environment and genes affect the chances of getting breast cancer. A total of 50,000 women joined the study.
Information for Health Professionals / Researchers (7 links)
- PubMed search for publications about Breast Cancer, Familial - Limit search to: [Reviews]
PubMed Central search for free-access publications about Breast Cancer, Familial
US National Library of Medicine
PubMed has over 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Constantly updated. - Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment and Counseling
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Genetics of Breast and Ovarian Cancer
National Cancer Institute
PDQ summaries are written and frequently updated by editorial boards of experts Further info. - Familial Breast Cancer
NHS Evidence
Regularly updated and reviewed. Further info. - BRCA1 and BRCA2 Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
GeneReviews
Detailed referenced article including differential diagnosis, clinical management, genetic counseling, and molecular genetics. - Familial Breast Cancer
Patient UK - Penn II BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Risk Evaluation Model
University of Pennsylvania
"This model can be used to predict the pre-test probability, or prior probability, that a person has a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In general, individuals with at least a 5-10% chance of having a mutation in either gene are considered good candidates for genetic testing. This model does not predict breast cancer risk. It focuses only on the chance that an individual has inherited a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2."
Latest Research Publications
This list of publications is regularly updated (Source: PubMed).
Validation of the BRCA1 antibody MS110 and the utility of BRCA1 as a patient selection biomarker in immunohistochemical analysis of breast and ovarian tumours.
Virchows Arch. 2013; 462(3):269-79 [PubMed]
BRCA1 loss activates cathepsin L-mediated degradation of 53BP1 in breast cancer cells.
J Cell Biol. 2013; 200(2):187-202 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 21/07/2013
Association between family history and clinicopathologic characteristics in 1987 breast cancer patients: single institution experience from Turkey.
J BUON. 2012 Oct-Dec; 17(4):649-57 [PubMed]
METHODS: In this study with 1987 breast cancer patients, we analyzed their tumor characteristics and outcomes, as well as the total number, degree and age of affected relatives, and their type of cancer. Results were assessed using Pearson chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: 24.1% (n=479) of the patients had FHBOC. Patients with FHBOC were younger (47.7 vs. 49.1 years; p=0.03) and tended to have node-negative breast cancer (45.4 vs. 39.8%; p=0.006). The median overall survival (OS) was shorter in patients with FHBOC with a borderline p-value (p=0.063), compared to patients with no family history. The median OS was shorter in patients who had ≥ 2 relatives with breast cancer (p=0.014), in those having first degree relatives with breast cancer, presenting with metastatic disease (p= 0.020). FHBOC patients with triple negative breast cancer had the highest risk of death (p<0.0001) and recurrence (p<0.0001). Patients who had at least one relative with breast cancer aged ≤ 50 years were also at increased risk of recurrence (p7equals;0.006).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients with FH7horbar;BOC are younger, tend to have small tumor size, node-negative disease and their survival is shorter compared to patients without family history. This is the first study evaluating the clinicopathologic differences of patients with and without FHBOC in Turkish population.
Hereditary breast cancer in the Han Chinese population.
J Epidemiol. 2013; 23(2):75-84 [PubMed]
Building family capacity for Native Hawaiian women with breast cancer.
Health Soc Work. 2012; 37(4):216-24 [PubMed]
The ectopic expression of BRCA1 is associated with genesis, progression, and prognosis of breast cancer in young patients.
Diagn Pathol. 2012; 7:181 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 21/07/2013
METHODS: The pathological data of 367 cases of female breast cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed, focusing on the analysis of young breast cancer incidence trends and the clinical and pathological features.
RESULTS: Compared with elderly breast cancer patients, young women with breast cancers had larger tumor sizes, higher histological grades, and lymph node metastasis rates. The majority of patients were in the PTNM III stage, with the clinical and pathological features of strong invasiveness. The positive expression rate of the BRCA1 protein in the young group was higher than that in the old group. BRCA1 expression was positively correlated with the PTNM stage and axillary lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The ectopic expression of BRCA1 is associated with the genesis, progression, and prognosis of young breast cancer patients. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1628000054838044.
Risk of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer in noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with a family history of breast cancer: a report from the Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study.
J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(4):433-9 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our population-based case-control study comparing women with CBC to women with unilateral breast cancer (UBC), we selected women who tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (594 patients with CBC/1,119 control patients with UBC). Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated to examine the association between family history of breast cancer and risk of asynchronous CBC. Age- and family history-specific 10-year cumulative absolute risks of CBC were estimated.
RESULTS: Family history of breast cancer was associated with increased CBC risk; risk was highest among young women (< 45 years) with first-degree relatives affected at young ages (< 45 years; RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.3) or women with first-degree relatives with bilateral disease (RR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.0 to 6.4). Women diagnosed with UBC before age 55 years with a first-degree family history of CBC had a 10-year risk of CBC of 15.6%.
CONCLUSION: Young women with breast cancer who have a family history of breast cancer and who test negative for deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at significantly greater risk of CBC than other breast cancer survivors. This risk varies with diagnosis age, family history of CBC, and degree of relationship to an affected relative. Women with a first-degree family history of bilateral disease have risks of CBC similar to mutation carriers. This has important implications for the clinical management of patients with breast cancer with family history of the disease.
The role of BRCA1 in DNA double-strand repair: past and present.
Exp Cell Res. 2013; 319(5):575-87 [PubMed]
Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
Cancer. 2013; 119(6):1266-76 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/03/2014
METHODS: A Markov Monte Carlo computer model was used to simulate screening in asymptomatic women who were BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Three dual-modality strategies were compared with digital mammography (DM) alone: 1) DM and MRI alternating at 6-month intervals beginning at age 25 years (Alt25), 2) annual MRI beginning at age 25 years with alternating DM added at age 30 years (MRI25/Alt30), and 3) DM and MRI alternating at 6-month intervals beginning at age 30 years (Alt30). Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs (in 2010 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness (dollars per QALY gained). Additional outcomes included potential harms of screening, and lifetime costs stratified into component categories (screening and diagnosis, treatment, mortality, and patient time costs).
RESULTS: All 3 dual-modality screening strategies increased QALYs and costs. Alt30 screening had the lowest incremental costs per additional QALY gained (BRCA1, $74,200 per QALY; BRCA2, $215,700 per QALY). False-positive test results increased substantially with dual-modality screening and occurred more frequently in BRCA2 carriers. Downstream savings in both breast cancer treatment and mortality costs were outweighed by increases in up-front screening and diagnosis costs. The results were influenced most by estimates of breast cancer risk and MRI costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternating MRI and DM screening at 6-month intervals beginning at age 30 years was identified as a clinically effective approach to applying current guidelines, and was more cost-effective in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers compared with BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
IGF-1 and BRCA1 signalling pathways in familial cancer.
Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(12):e537-44 [PubMed]
Cooperativity of Rb, Brca1, and p53 in malignant breast cancer evolution.
PLoS Genet. 2012; 8(11):e1003027 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/03/2014
Methodological quality of English-language genetic guidelines on hereditary breast-cancer screening and management: an evaluation using the AGREE instrument.
BMC Med. 2012; 10:143 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/03/2014
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google were searched for guidelines published up to October 2010. All guidelines in English were included. The Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to assess the quality of the guidelines, and their reported evidence base was evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirteen guidelines were deemed eligible: seven had been developed by independent associations, and the other six had national/state endorsements. Four guidelines performed satisfactorily, achieving a score of greater than 50% in all six AGREE domains. Mean ± SD standardized scores for the six AGREE domains were: 90 ± 9% for 'scope and purpose', 51 ± 18% for 'stakeholder involvement', 55 ± 27% for 'rigour of development', 80 ± 11% for 'clarity and presentation', 37 ± 32% for 'applicability', and 47 ± 38% for 'editorial independence'. Ten of the thirteen guidelines were found to be based on research evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the ethical implications and the high costs of genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer, guidelines on this topic should provide clear and evidence-based recommendations. Our analysis shows that there is scope for improving many aspects of the methodological quality of current guidelines. The AGREE instrument is a useful tool, and could be used profitably by guidelines developers to improve the quality of recommendations.
The risk of primary and contralateral breast cancer after ovarian cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: Implications for counseling.
Cancer. 2013; 119(5):955-62 [PubMed]
METHODS: From the database of the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, patients who had BRCA-associated OC without a history of unilateral breast cancer (BC) (at risk of PBC; n = 79) or with a history of unilateral BC (at risk of CBC; n = 37) were selected. The control groups consisted of unaffected BRCA mutation carriers (n = 351) or mutation carriers who had a previous unilateral BC (n = 294), respectively. The risks of PBC and CBC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival method with death considered as a competing risk event.
RESULTS: Women with BRCA-associated OC had lower 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year risks of PBC (3%, 6%, and 11%, respectively) compared with unaffected mutation carriers (6%, 16%, and 28%, respectively; P = .03), although they had a considerably higher mortality rate at similar time points (13%, 33%, and 61%, respectively, vs 1%, 2%, and 2%, respectively; P < .001). In BRCA mutation carriers with a previous unilateral BC, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year risks of CBC were nonsignificantly lower in patients with OC than in those without OC (0%, 7%, and 7%, respectively, vs 6%, 16%, and 34%, respectively; P = .06), whereas the mortality rate was higher in patients with OC (19%, 34%, and 55%, respectively, vs 4%, 11%, and 21%, respectively; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BRCA-associated OC had a lower risk of developing a subsequent PBC or CBC than mutation carriers without OC, whereas the risk of dying from OC was greater than the risk of developing BC. These data may facilitate more tailored counseling for this patient subgroup, although confirmative studies are warranted.
Different methylation and microRNA expression pattern in male and female familial breast cancer.
J Cell Physiol. 2013; 228(6):1264-9 [PubMed]
Epigenetic regulation by Z-DNA silencer function controls cancer-associated ADAM-12 expression in breast cancer: cross-talk between MeCP2 and NF1 transcription factor family.
Cancer Res. 2013; 73(2):736-44 [PubMed]
Population prevalence of first- and second-degree family history of breast and ovarian cancer.
East Afr J Public Health. 2011; 8(4):275-7 [PubMed]
METHODS: This cross-sectional survey assessed family history of cancer in first- and second degree relatives. Totally, 7,300 persons aged > or = 20 years selected by random sampling from Tehran general population. Age- and sex-specified prevalence of breast and ovarian cancer in respondent's family was calculated.
RESULTS: Of all, 279(4.3%) individuals reported a history of breast or ovarian cancer in their relatives. The prevalence of breast cancer family history was 1.8% among first-degree relatives and 2.5% among second- degree relatives. For ovarian cancer, first- and second-degree prevalence ranged from 0.05 to 0.12%. Those with family history of cancer were more often young and female.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the estimates of prevalence presented here are likely to be conservative compared with actual current prevalence because of some limitations. While family history is an important risk factor for common cancers such as breast cancer, recognizing pattern of familial cancer that signify increased risk can help us to identify individuals who may have higher chance to develop specified cancers.
MicroRNA-200 family modulation in distinct breast cancer phenotypes.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47709 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/03/2014
Mutation analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and BRD7 in a hospital-based series of German patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47993 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/03/2014
A role for common genomic variants in the assessment of familial breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(35):4330-6 [PubMed]
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 1,143 women with breast cancer who had completed BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening as a result of a high risk for hereditary breast cancer. Genotyping of 22 breast cancer-associated genomic variants was performed. A polygenic risk score (PRS), calculated as the sum of the log odds ratios for each allele, was compared with the same metric in 892 controls from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study. The clinical features associated with the high and low ends of the polygenic risk distribution were compared.
RESULTS: Women affected by familial breast cancer had a highly significant excess of risk alleles compared with controls (P = 1.0 × 10(-16)). Polygenic risk (measured by the PRS) was greater in women who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation compared with mutation carriers (P = 2.3 × 10(-6)). Non-BRCA1/2 women in the top quartile of the polygenic risk distribution were more likely to have had early-onset breast cancer (< 30 years of age, odds ratio [OR]= 3.37, P = .03) and had a higher rate of second breast cancer (OR 1.96, P = .02) compared with women with low polygenic risk.
CONCLUSION: Genetic testing for common risk variants in women undergoing assessment for familial breast cancer may identify a distinct group of high-risk women in whom the role of risk-reducing interventions should be explored.
Nitric oxide-dependent downregulation of BRCA1 expression promotes genetic instability.
Cancer Res. 2013; 73(2):706-15 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 15/01/2014
The F-box protein FBXO44 mediates BRCA1 ubiquitination and degradation.
J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(49):41014-22 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 30/11/2013
Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.
Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(12):2322-9 [PubMed]
METHODS: The sample included 6706 women, aged 46 to 74 years, with no breast cancer history. Multinomial logistic regression assessed the association between family history of cancer and breast cancer risk perception. Structural equation modeling estimated the relationship between family history of cancer and repeat mammography.
RESULTS: Breast cancer risk perception was strongly associated with family history of breast cancer in the mother or mother and sister (odds ratio [OR] = 32.15; P < .001); family history of breast cancer in the sister, daughter, or male first-degree relative (OR = 6.6-8.4; P < .001); and maternal history of other cancers (OR = 1.38-2.73; P < .001). For repeat mammography, women with maternal history of breast cancer had a mean increase of 0.50 more mammograms in the past 6 years compared with women without maternal history of breast cancer (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer risk perception was associated with the type of cancer found in first-degree relatives and with the person's relationship to the family member with cancer. Family history of breast cancer affected repeat mammography behavior.
BRCA1 epigenetic inactivation predicts sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in breast and ovarian cancer.
Epigenetics. 2012; 7(11):1225-9 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 30/11/2013
RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is important for defects in homologous recombination caused by loss of the breast cancer susceptibility factor BRCA1.
J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(48):40618-28 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 23/11/2013
RESULTS: RNF168 depletion suppresses HR defects caused by BRCA1 silencing; RNF168 influences HR similarly to 53BP1.
CONCLUSION: RNF168 is important for HR defects caused by BRCA1 loss.
SIGNIFICANCE: Although RNF168 promotes BRCA1 and 53BP1 localization to chromosomal breaks, RNF168 affects HR similarly to 53BP1. The RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is required for recruitment of several DNA damage response factors to double strand breaks (DSBs), including 53BP1 and BRCA1. Because 53BP1 and BRCA1 function antagonistically during the DSB repair pathway homologous recombination (HR), the influence of RNF168 on HR has been unclear. We report that RNF168 depletion causes an elevated frequency of two distinct HR pathways (homology-directed repair and single strand annealing), suppresses defects in HR caused by BRCA1 silencing, but does not suppress HR defects caused by disruption of CtIP, RAD50, BRCA2, or RAD51. Furthermore, RNF168-depleted cells can form ionizing radiation-induced foci of the recombinase RAD51 without forming BRCA1 ionizing radiation-induced foci, indicating that this loss of BRCA1 recruitment to DSBs does not reflect a loss of function during HR. Additionally, we find that RNF168 and 53BP1 have a similar influence on HR. We suggest that RNF168 is important for HR defects caused by BRCA1 loss.
PPARγ agonists target aromatase via both PGE2 and BRCA1.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012; 5(10):1169-72 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/10/2013
Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.
Cancer Control. 2012; 19(4):255-66 [PubMed]
METHODS: This paper illustrates the role of genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast cancer, using hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome as a model due to germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2. Specifically, the value of genetic counseling and testing for HBOC across the cancer prevention and control continuum is outlined as it pertains to breast cancer.
RESULTS: In recognition of the importance of risk assessment for hereditary breast cancer, leading health professional organizations have developed specific guidelines and recommendations to providers for identification of women at increased risk for carrying a BRCA mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Institutional efforts specific to genetic counseling and testing have resulted in the implementation of a model driven by physician recommendation as a referral system for high-risk breast cancer patients. Establishing an infrastructure to support research, education, and outreach initiatives focused on BRCA genetic counseling and testing will provide information that can improve the delivery of cancer genetics services.
Molecular analysis of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 using amplicon-based massive parallel pyrosequencing.
J Mol Diagn. 2012; 14(6):623-30 [PubMed]
Family relationships and post-traumatic growth in breast cancer patients.
Psychiatr Danub. 2012; 24(3):298-306 [PubMed]
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 190 women, breast-cancer patients, aged 31 to 83 years. Their educational level was representative of the educational level in the population of this age range. The Participants were members of the Oncology Patients Society. Post traumatic growth index, FACES-IV - family relationships scale, coping response inventory, demographic, and illness-related questionnaires were administered after informed consent was obtained. The PTG index was used as an outcome measure.
RESULTS: Congruent with previous findings, analyses yielded weak correlations between demographic- and illness-related variables, and PTG. Also congruent with previous findings, approach related coping strategies were found to predict PTG, R squared =0.16, p<0.001. In addition to previous findings, family related factors predicted unique proportion of variance on PTG, p<0.05, with communication having positive and satisfaction negative load on PTG.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that family related factors predicted PTG above and beyond coping-related strategies and demographics. Communication, however, seems to mediate the association between satisfaction and PTG. Theoretical concerns and practical implications are discussed.
Breast Cancer Incidence After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012; 5(11):1291-7 [PubMed]
Identification of BRCA1/2 founder mutations in Southern Chinese breast cancer patients using gene sequencing and high resolution DNA melting analysis.
PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e43994 [PubMed] Article available free on PMC after 01/10/2013
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 651 clinically high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer patients were recruited from the Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry from 2007 to 2011. Comprehensive BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening was performed using bi-directional sequencing of all coding exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Sequencing results were confirmed by in-house developed full high resolution DNA melting (HRM) analysis. Among the 451 probands analyzed, 69 (15.3%) deleterious BRCA mutations were identified, comprising 29 in BRCA1 and 40 in BRCA2. The four recurrent BRCA1 mutations (c.470_471delCT, c.3342_3345delAGAA, c.5406+1_5406+3delGTA and c.981_982delAT) accounted for 34.5% (10/29) of all BRCA1 mutations in this cohort. The four recurrent BRCA2 mutations (c.2808_2811delACAA, c.3109C>T, c.7436_7805del370 and c.9097_9098insA) accounted for 40% (16/40) of all BRCA2 mutations. Haplotype analysis was performed to confirm 1 BRCA1 and 3 BRCA2 mutations are putative founder mutations. Rapid HRM mutation screening for a panel of the founder mutations were developed and validated.
CONCLUSION: In this study, our findings suggest that BRCA mutations account for a substantial proportion of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Southern Chinese population. Knowing the spectrum and frequency of the founder mutations in this population will assist in the development of a cost-effective rapid screening assay, which in turn facilitates genetic counseling and testing for the purpose of cancer risk assessment.
This page last updated: 22nd May 2013
Displaying links verified within last 2 weeks at time of update.
