BACKGROUND: According to the results of the international study Relapsed AML 2001/01 response was better after re-induction with L-DNR/FLAG (liposomal daunorubicin, fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF) compared to FLAG only but survival rate was not improved. However, the findings might be group-specific.
METHOD: Patient characteristics, actual therapy given and long-term course of the disease in 155 pediatric patients (including non-randomized) with first relapse and 10 primary nonresponders treated in Germany were analyzed.
RESULTS: Overall 4-year survival rates after relapse were similar in the 2 treatment groups L-DNR/FLAG and FLAG (0.43 ± 0.05 vs. 0.47 ± 0.06, p(log-rank)=0.47). The rate of randomization was low (65%) and 5% of the 101 randomized patients changed the treatment arm. Therefore, induction was based in 40% patients on an individual decision with preference for L-DNR/FLAG. There were less patients with favorable cytogenetics and morphology in the L-DNR/FLAG-group (p<0.04). Response to the first re-induction course at day 28 tended to be more unfavorable with FLAG only. In this patient group protocol intensifications were more frequent as compared to the L-DNR/FLAG-group (p=0.07), and late CR could be achieved after intensification in 9/18 poor responding patients.
CONCLUSION: The initial selection bias of relapse patients with unfavorable risk factors to the disadvantage of the L-DNR/FLAG-group and the more drug- and time-intensive treatment after 1(st) re-induction given in the FLAG-group may have nullified the initial beneficial effect of L-DNR containing re-induction therapy and led to similar and relatively favorable survival rates in both treatment groups in Germany.

Background Kaposi's sarcoma remains the most common cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa and the second most common cancer in HIV-infected patients worldwide. Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), there has been a decline in its incidence.However, Kaposi's sarcoma continues to be diagnosed in HIV-infected patients.Objectives To assess the added advantage of chemotherapy plus HAART compared to HAART alone; and the advantages of different chemotherapy regimens in HAART and HAART naive HIV infected adults with severe or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma.Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and , GATEWAY, the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health's ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials and the Aegis archive of HIV/AIDS for conference abstracts. An updated search was conducted in July 2014.Selection criteria Randomised trials and observational studies evaluating the effects of any chemotherapeutic regimen in combination with HAART compared to HAART alone, chemotherapy versus HAART, and comparisons between different chemotherapy regimens.Data collection and analysis Two review authors assessed the studies independently and extracted outcome data.We used the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) as the measure of effect.We did not conduct meta-analysis as none of the included trials assessed identical chemotherapy regimens.Main results We included six randomised trials and three observational studies involving 792 HIV-infected adults with severe Kaposi's sarcoma.Seven studies included patients with a mix of mild to moderate (T0) and severe (T1) Kaposi's sarcoma. However, this review was restricted to the subset of participants with severe Kaposi's sarcoma disease.Studies comparing HAART plus chemotherapy to HAART alone showed the following: one trial comparing HAART plus doxorubicin,bleomycin and vincristine (ABV) to HAART alone showed a significant reduction in disease progression in the HAART plus ABV group (RR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.75, 100 participants); there was no statistically significant reduction in mortality and no difference in adverse events. A cohort study comparing liposomal anthracyclines plus HAART to HAART alone showed a non-statistically significant reduction in Kaposi's sarcoma immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients that received HAART plus liposomal anthracyclines (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.16 to 1.55, 129 participants).Studies comparing HAART plus chemotherapy to HAART plus a different chemotherapy regimen showed the following: one trial involving 49 participants and comparing paclitaxel versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients on HAART showed no difference in disease progression. Another trial involving 46 patients and comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus liposomal daunorubicin showed no participants with progressive Kaposi's sarcoma disease in either group.Studies comparing different chemotherapy regimens in patients from the pre-HAART era showed the following: in the single RCT comparing liposomal daunorubicin to ABV, there was no significant difference with the use of liposomal daunorubicin compared to ABV in disease progression (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.82, 227 participants) and overall response rate. Another trial involving 178 participants and comparing oral etoposide versus ABV demonstrated no difference in mortality in either group. A non-randomised trial comparing bleomycin alone to ABV demonstrated a higher median survival time in the ABV group; there was also a non-statistically significant reduction in adverse events and disease progression in the ABV group (RR 11; 95% CI 0.67 to 179.29, 24 participants).An additional non-randomised study showed a non-statistically significant overall mortality benefit from liposomal doxorubicin as compared to conservative management consisting of either bleomycin plus vinblastine, vincristine or single-agent antiretroviral therapy alone (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15, 29 participants). The overall quality of evidence can be described as moderate quality. The quality of evidence was downgraded due to the small size of many of the included studies and small number of events.Authors' conclusions The findings from this review suggest that HAART plus chemotherapy may be beneficial in reducing disease progression compared to HAART alone in patients with severe or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma. For patients on HAART, when choosing from different chemotherapy regimens, there was no observed difference between liposomal doxorubicin, liposomal daunorubicin and paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Kaposi's sarcoma remains the most common cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa and the second most common cancer in HIV-infected patients worldwide. Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), there has been a decline in its incidence.However, Kaposi's sarcoma continues to be diagnosed in HIV-infected patients.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the added advantage of chemotherapy plus HAART compared to HAART alone; and the advantages of different chemotherapy regimens in HAART and HAART naive HIV infected adults with severe or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and , GATEWAY, the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health's ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials and the Aegis archive of HIV/AIDS for conference abstracts. An updated search was conducted in July 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials and observational studies evaluating the effects of any chemotherapeutic regimen in combination with HAART compared to HAART alone, chemotherapy versus HAART, and comparisons between different chemotherapy regimens.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed the studies independently and extracted outcome data.We used the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) as the measure of effect.We did not conduct meta-analysis as none of the included trials assessed identical chemotherapy regimens.
MAIN RESULTS: We included six randomised trials and three observational studies involving 792 HIV-infected adults with severe Kaposi's sarcoma.Seven studies included patients with a mix of mild to moderate (T0) and severe (T1) Kaposi's sarcoma. However, this review was restricted to the subset of participants with severe Kaposi's sarcoma disease.Studies comparing HAART plus chemotherapy to HAART alone showed the following: one trial comparing HAART plus doxorubicin,bleomycin and vincristine (ABV) to HAART alone showed a significant reduction in disease progression in the HAART plus ABV group (RR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.75, 100 participants); there was no statistically significant reduction in mortality and no difference in adverse events. A cohort study comparing liposomal anthracyclines plus HAART to HAART alone showed a non-statistically significant reduction in Kaposi's sarcoma immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients that received HAART plus liposomal anthracyclines (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.16 to 1.55, 129 participants).Studies comparing HAART plus chemotherapy to HAART plus a different chemotherapy regimen showed the following: one trial involving 49 participants and comparing paclitaxel versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients on HAART showed no difference in disease progression. Another trial involving 46 patients and comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus liposomal daunorubicin showed no participants with progressive Kaposi's sarcoma disease in either group.Studies comparing different chemotherapy regimens in patients from the pre-HAART era showed the following: in the single RCT comparing liposomal daunorubicin to ABV, there was no significant difference with the use of liposomal daunorubicin compared to ABV in disease progression (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.82, 227 participants) and overall response rate. Another trial involving 178 participants and comparing oral etoposide versus ABV demonstrated no difference in mortality in either group. A non-randomised trial comparing bleomycin alone to ABV demonstrated a higher median survival time in the ABV group; there was also a non-statistically significant reduction in adverse events and disease progression in the ABV group (RR 11; 95% CI 0.67 to 179.29, 24 participants).An additional non-randomised study showed a non-statistically significant overall mortality benefit from liposomal doxorubicin as compared to conservative management consisting of either bleomycin plus vinblastine, vincristine or single-agent antiretroviral therapy alone (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15, 29 participants). The overall quality of evidence can be described as moderate quality. The quality of evidence was downgraded due to the small size of many of the included studies and small number of events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this review suggest that HAART plus chemotherapy may be beneficial in reducing disease progression compared to HAART alone in patients with severe or progressive Kaposi's sarcoma. For patients on HAART, when choosing from different chemotherapy regimens, there was no observed difference between liposomal doxorubicin, liposomal daunorubicin and paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: People living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk of cancer, both non-AIDS- and AIDS-defining malignancies (NADM and ADM). Systemic chemotherapy also predisposes to secondary cancers. The potential contribution of systemic liposomal anthracycline chemotherapy (SLAC) to the development of second cancers in PLWH is unknown.
METHODS: Since 1998, we have treated 495 PLWH and Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) with a stage-stratified approach including 163 who received SLAC as first-line treatment for KS. Subsequent ADM and NADM diagnosed in this population were recorded.
RESULTS: More patients who received SLAC had T1 stage disease (p < 0.0001) and lower CD4 cell counts (p < 0.0001) in line with the stage-stratified treatment, but there were no significant differences in age (p = 0.29), gender (p = 0.18), prior AIDS-defining illness (p = 0.45), plasma HIV viral load (p = 0.15), or HHV8 viral load (p = 0.39) between the two groups. During a median follow-up of 4.6 years (maximum 15 years) from KS diagnosis, 28 patients developed a second cancer (5 ADM and 23 NADM). The 5-year cumulative risk of second cancer is 5.8 % (95 % CI 3.0-8.6 %), and there is no significant difference in the rate between those treated with SLAC and those not (log rank p = 0.19). Most patients (n = 131) were treated with daunoxome (liposomal daunorubicin) chemotherapy, and there was no significant correlation between risk of second cancer and cumulative dose of daunoxome (p = 0.23).
CONCLUSION: Although the risk of second cancer after a diagnosis of KS in PLWH is high, systemic liposomal anthracycline chemotherapy does not appear to increase the risk.

Therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia are still undefined and often unsatisfactory. We report the outcome of 79 patients with relapsed-refractory acute leukemia treated with fludarabine, cytarabine, and liposomal daunorubicin (FLAD regimen) followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), when clinically indicated, between May 2000 and January 2013. Forty-one patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 38 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Two patients with myeloid blast crises of CML and three with lymphoid blast crises were included in the AML and ALL subgroups, respectively. Median age was 48 years (range 13-77). FLAD was well tolerated with negligible, nonhematological toxicity. Six patients (7.5 %) died before response evaluation. Forty-seven patients achieved hematologic complete response (CR). Complete remission rate was 53 and 65 % among AML and ALL patients, respectively. No CR was recorded among 11 refractory AML patients. Twenty-four patients (30 %) underwent HSCT. Nine patients received stem cells from an HLA identical sibling, and 15 from an alternative donor (3 unrelated matched, 12 haploidentical sibling). Median overall survival in AML and ALL patients receiving FLAD therapy was 9 and 8 months, respectively. A 5-year projected OS for patients receiving the whole program (FLAD + HSCT) was 24 % for AML patients (median survival 43 months), 28 % for ALL patients treated in relapse (median survival 15 months), and 0 % for ALL patients treated for refractory disease. In this paper, we show that FLAD seems to be an effective bridge therapy to HSCT for a part of poor prognosis acute leukemia patients. However, prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

In general, de novo solid tumors are composed of phenotypically and functionally heterogeneous malignant cells. This heterogeneity interferes with the effectiveness of targeted molecular cancer therapies. Even if most of the tumor is killed by a targeted treatment, recurrences are common and can be lethal. In this study, a mixed tumor model, which is predominantly a population of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive A431 cells combined with a smaller population of EGFR-negative Balb3T3/DsRed cells, was established. This mixed tumor was then treated with photoimmunotherapy, a newly developed target-cell-selective cancer therapy using a monoclonal antibody (mAb)-photosensitizer (IR700 fluorescence dye) conjugate and exposure of near-infrared light. Although photoimmunotherapy successfully treated EGFR-positive A431 cells in the mixed tumor, EGFR-negative Balb/DsRed cells were not responsive. However, photoimmunotherapy also induced a large increase in tumor permeability, known as the super-enhanced permeability and retention (SUPR) effect, which allowed a 5-fold increase in the accumulation of a liposomal chemotherapy (DaunoXome) and resulted in more effective therapy than either photoimmunotherapy or liposomal daunorubicin alone. The liposomal daunorubicin, administered 1 hour after EGFR-targeted photoimmunotherapy, was homogeneously distributed, allowing delivery to tiny surviving nests of EGFR-negative Balb3T3/DsRed cells, resulting in prolonged survival of mice.

Outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improve significantly by intensification of induction. To further intensify anthracycline dosage without increasing cardiotoxicity, we compared potentially less cardiotoxic liposomal daunorubicin (L-DNR) to idarubicin at a higher-than-equivalent dose (80 vs 12 mg/m(2) per day for 3 days) during induction. In the multicenter therapy-optimization trial AML-BFM 2004, 521 of 611 pediatric patients (85%) were randomly assigned to L-DNR or idarubicin induction. Five-year results in both treatment arms were similar (overall survival 76% ± 3% [L-DNR] vs 75% ± 3% [idarubicin], Plogrank = .65; event-free survival [EFS] 59% ± 3% vs 53% ± 3%, Plogrank = .25; cumulative incidence of relapse 29% ± 3% vs 31% ± 3%, P(Gray) = .75), as were EFS results for standard (72% ± 5% vs 68% ± 5%, Plogrank = .47) and high-risk (51% ± 4% vs 46% ± 4%, Plogrank = .45) patients. L-DNR resulted in significantly better probability of EFS in patients with t(8;21). Overall, treatment-related mortality was lower with L-DNR than idarubicin (2/257 vs 10/264 patients, P = .04). Grade 3/4 cardiotoxicity was rare after induction (4 L-DNR vs 5 idarubicin). Only 1 L-DNR and 3 idarubicin patients presented with subclinical or mild cardiomyopathy during follow-up. In conclusion, at the given dose, L-DNR has overall antileukemic activity comparable to idarubicin, promises to be more active in subgroups, and causes less treatment-related mortality. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00111345.

PURPOSE: In pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), optimal reinduction therapy is unknown. Studies suggest that liposomal daunorubicin (DNX; DaunoXome; Galen, Craigavon, United Kingdom) is effective and less cardiotoxic, which is important in this setting. These considerations led to a randomized phase III study by the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed or primary refractory non-French-American-British type M3 AML who were younger than 21 years of age were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG) or to FLAG plus DNX in the first reinduction course. The primary end point was status of the bone marrow (BM) sampled shortly before the second course of chemotherapy (the day 28 BM). Data are presented according to intention-to-treat for all 394 randomly assigned patients (median follow-up, 4.0 years).
RESULTS: The complete remission (CR) rate was 64%, and the 4-year probability of survival (pOS) was 38% (SE, 3%). The day 28 BM status (available in 359 patients) was good (≤ 20% leukemic blasts) in 80% of patients randomly assigned to FLAG/DNX and 70% for patients randomly assigned to FLAG (P = .04). Concerning secondary end points, the CR rate was 69% with FLAG/DNX and 59% with FLAG (P = .07), but overall survival was similar. However, core-binding factor (CBF) AML treated with FLAG/DNX resulted in pOS of 82% versus 58% with FLAG (P = .04). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was essentially similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: DNX added to FLAG improves early treatment response in pediatric relapsed AML. Overall long-term survival was similar, but CBF-AML showed an improved survival with FLAG/DNX. International collaboration proved feasible and resulted in the best outcome for pediatric relapsed AML reported thus far.

The increase of fludarabine-resistant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) presents a new treatment challenge. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab for patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL. Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and selected conference proceedings were searched. Seventeen relevant publications reporting stratified data were identified. Treatments included: rituximab in combination with etanercept, alemtuzumab, bendamustine or methylprednisolone alone, with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FCR), with oxaliplatin as well as fludarabine and cytarabine, with cyclophosphamide as well as fludarabine and alemtuzumab (CFAR), and with cytarabine, cisplatinum and dexamethasone (DHAP). One study evaluated rituximab with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in combination with alternating cyclophosphamide, liposomal daunorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone and methotrexate plus Ara-C. One study evaluated rituximab as monotherapy. Of the nine studies considering overall response, eight reported rates above 50% (four reported rates above 75%). Median overall survival was 37 months for FCR, 11 months for CFAR, 20 months for rituximab with methylprednisolone, 30 months for rituximab with alemtuzumab and 44 months for an FCR/CFAR mixed treatment. The identified studies indicate that regimens containing rituximab may be highly efficacious in the fludarabine-refractory CLL setting. Nevertheless, further research is needed to facilitate the choice of treatment for the clinician.

Drug release from liposomes in the endosome-lysosomal organelles into cytoplasm is critical to cytotoxicity and anticancer effects. Chloroquine is a lysosomotropic agent that has been reported to enhance in vitro cytotoxicity of basic anticancer drugs. To investigate the mechanism of chloroquine triggering basic anticancer drugs release from liposomes and the potential to treat solid tumors in clinic, daunorubicin was loaded into folate-targeted liposomes by ammonium sulfate remote loading method. In vitro triggered release profiles showed that chloroquine can instantly expel about 11% daunorubicin out of liposomes. In vitro cytotoxicity of folate-targeted liposomal daunorubicin on L1210JF(FR+) was enhanced by chloroquine, which was further confirmed by confocal micrographs. Intraliposomal pH was increased by adding chloroquine into 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (HPTS) liposomes with ammonium sulfate gradient, but was not higher than 5.5. Ion exchange and pH rising are the most plausible mechanisms of chloroquine triggering daunorubicin release from liposomes. In vivo anticancer effects on a murine solid tumor model with L1210JF indicated that chloroquine induced daunorubicin release from liposomes as well. Overall, these results support the potential application of chloroquine to trigger the release of liposomal drugs and ultimately to improve the therapeutic efficacy.

PURPOSE: The cancer stem cells play an important role in the invasion, metastasis and relapse of cancers as they are resistant to regular chemotherapy. In the present study, stealth liposomal daunorubicin plus tamoxifen was developed for eradicating breast cancer cells together with cancer stem cells.
METHODS: Inhibitory effects were performed on the bulk human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), the sorted MCF-7 cancer stem-like cells (side population, SP), and the sorted MCF-7 cancer cells (NSP), respectively. Antitumor activity and TUNEL analysis were evaluated on the MCF-7 xenografts in nude mice.
RESULTS: The encapsulation efficiencies of daunorubicin and tamoxifen were 95% and 90%, respectively. The mean particle size of the stealth liposomes was about 100 nm. Breast cancer stem cells were identified by the specific markers CD44+/CD24-, and isolated from bulk MCF-7 cells. When applying stealth liposomal daunorubicin plus tamoxifen, the inhibitory effects on both the breast cancer cells and the cancer stem cells were significantly increased in vitro, respectively. In the MCF-7 xenografts in mice, stealth liposomal daunorubicin plus tamoxifen showed the most favorable antitumor activity due to the passive targeting the tumor tissue and the synergistic effects in eliminating breast cancer cells and cancer stem cells.
CONCLUSION: Stealth liposomal daunorubicin plus tamoxifen could have the potentials in eliminating both breast cancer cells and cancer stem cells.

BACKGROUND: In previous studies of frontline therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), early treatment with higher doses of anthracyclines has been reported to improve outcome. The current study was conducted to evaluate whether addition of anthracycline-based consolidation chemotherapy (Course 2) with liposomal daunorubicin (150 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] on Days 1 and 2) and cytarabine (1.5 g/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2) to the standard hyper-CVAD regimen (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high dose methotrexate and cytarabine) would improve outcome.
METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive adults with de novo ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma were treated with this modified hyper-CVAD regimen inclusive of rituximab for CD20 expression≥20%.
RESULTS: Sixty-three (93%) patients achieved complete response (CR). With a median follow-up of 90 months, the 5-year CR duration (CRD) and overall survival (OS) rates were 46% and 44%, respectively. Compared with 208 patients treated with standard hyper-CVAD (rates of 45% and 47%, respectively; P=not significant), outcome with the modified hyper-CVAD regimen was not improved overall. Outcome was improved by the addition of rituximab for the CD20-positive subset (rates of CRD and OS of 50% and 53%, respectively), whereas anthracycline intensification worsened outcome for the CD20-negative subset (rates of CRD and OS of 41% and 35%, respectively; P=.01) compared with standard hyper-CVAD. A high mortality rate related to infections in CR was noted among patients aged 60 years or older.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the hyper-CVAD regimen, early anthracycline intensification did not improve outcome for adults with de novo ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether temperature stress conditions affect the cellular uptake of liposomal doxorubicin, Doxil (DXL; Ortho Biotech, Raritan, New Jersey, USA), and liposomal daunorubicin, DaunoXome (DXM; Gilead Sciences, San Dimas, California, USA). Uptake of these cytotoxic compounds is essential for their pharmacological effect. Commercially available DXL and DXM were stressed for 6 days under altered temperature conditions of 22 and 50 degrees C, as compared to storage in their buffered formulations at the labeled temperature of 4 degrees C. The cellular uptake of the liposomal drugs was measured by fluorescence intensity in human ovarian SKOV-3 and murine macrophage J774A.1 cell lines following a 4-hour exposure to DXL or DXM. There was a 5- to 10-fold increase in the cellular uptake of DXL and DXM in both cell lines after stress exposure to 50 degrees C. Exposure of DXL to 22 degrees C stress decreased its uptake by SKOV-3 cells, when compared to exposure of DXL to 4 degrees C control conditions. A cell-based uptake assay may provide a means to assess changes in the functional activity of liposomes in conjunction with evaluation of their physicochemical properties in order to evaluate the stability and integrity of liposomes.

The treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory. We conducted a phase II randomized trial where patients received intermediate-dose cytarabine for 4 d followed by gemtuzumab ozogamicin on day 5 (Arm A), or combined with liposomal daunorubicin for 3 d (Arm B), or cytarabine given for 5 d combined with cyclophosphamide for 3 d and topotecan by continuous infusion for 5 d (Arm C). Eligible patients had primary refractory AML, a first relapse after a remission of <1 year, or a second or greater relapse. The primary objective of this trial was attainment of a conventional complete remission (CR) or a CR without platelet recovery (CRp) in at least 40% of patients. The CR/CRp rates for the 82 eligible patients were 3/26 (12%) in Arm A, 2/29 (7%) in Arm B, and 1/27 (4%) in Arm C. No patients who had relapsed within 6 months of initial CR or who had suffered multiple relapses responded. More than 95% of patients subsequently died of AML. No unexpected toxicities were encountered. We conclude that none of these three regimens were effective enough in the treatment of high-risk relapsed or refractory AML to warrant further study. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00005962.

This randomized phase III clinical trial explored the efficacy of DaunoXome (DNX) versus Daunorubicin (DNR) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients aged >60 years. Three hundred and one AML patients were randomized to receive DNR (45 mg/m(2) days 1-3) or DNX (80 mg/m(2) days 1-3) plus cytarabine (AraC; 100 mg/m(2) days 1-7). Patients in complete remission (CR) received a course of the same drugs as consolidation and then were randomized for maintenance with AraC+ all trans retinoic acid or no further treatment. Among 153 patients in the DNR arm, 78 (51.0%) achieved CR, 55 (35.9%) were resistant and 20 (13.1%) died during induction. Among 148 patients in the DNX arm, 73 (49.3%) achieved CR, 47 (31.8%) were resistant and 28 (18.9%) died during induction. Univariate analysis showed no difference as to induction results. After CR, DNX showed a higher incidence of early deaths (12.5% vs. 2.6% at 6 months, P = 0.053) but a lower incidence of relapse beyond 6 months (59% vs. 78% at 24 months, P = 0.064), with a cross in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves and a later advantage for DNX arm after 12 months from diagnosis. DNX seems to improve OS and DFS in the long-term follow-up, because of a reduction in late relapses.

A large proportion of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse after treatment, and some of them are resistant to primary induction chemotherapy. Sixty-one patients from seven hematological centers with poor-risk AML, primary refractory (n = 16), or relapsed (n = 45) were treated with a salvage regimen, including fludarabine (2 days) and cytarabine (3 days) in a sequential continuous infusion, associated with liposomal daunorubicin (3 days) (FLAD). Complete response rate was 44% and 56% for refractory and relapsed patients, respectively, with an overall response rate of 52% (32 of 61). Twenty-two patients (36%) were resistant to the salvage therapy. Seven patients (12%) died early during chemotherapy, four of them because of sepsis. Nineteen patients in complete remission (CR) underwent a stem-cell transplant (SCT) procedure: five autologous, nine from a HL-A identical sibling, and five from HL-A matched unrelated donors. Post-treatment aplasia and mucositis were major toxicities. Twenty patients (62.5%) relapsed after this treatment in a median of 7.3 months; ten patients relapsed after a SCT procedure. Nine patients are alive and disease free; three of them were rescued after a further cytotoxic treatment. The FLAD regimen proved to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment, with acceptable toxicity in this group of high-risk patients. A better response rate was obtained in the subgroup of relapsed patients, compared to patients treated for refractory disease. More then half (five of nine) of long-surviving patients are those who were submitted to a transplant procedure; thus, the main indication for FLAD seems to be to try to induce a rapid CR with minimum toxicity in order to perform a transplant as soon as possible.

Liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) was substituted for doxorubicin in the CHOP regimen, aiming to reduce toxicity and maintain or improve efficacy in elderly patients. Eligibility criteria included: age >or=60 years; previously untreated aggressive non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and performance status (PS) 0-2. Treatment was cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (maximum 2 mg), and DaunoXome 100 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, prednisolone 100 mg po on days 1-5 and G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day sc, for 6-8 cycles. For the 51 patients, median age was 70 years (range 60-88), 94% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 55% were high-intermediate or high-risk according to the age-adjusted international prognostic index. A mean of 6 cycles was delivered, with dose reductions of DaunoXome in 8.3% of cycles. The combined CR and CRu rate was 65.2%, survival was 566 days and 5-year survival 35%. Three deaths occurred during treatment and may have been related to COP-X. Only 4 (7.8%) of the remaining patients had >or=10% reduction in LVEF. However, 35% of patients were hospitalised during treatment, mostly for febrile neutropenia. The response rate to COP-X was similar to that expected with CHOP, with low cardiac toxicity. The high rate of infectious complications suggests that the DaunoXome dose used may be too high for this patient group. These results support further investigation of this regimen in patients with aggressive NHL.

BACKGROUND: Daunoxome (DNX) is an encapsulated form of daunorubicin in liposomal vesicles with suggested better pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and lesser cardio toxicity than the free form. Polyethyl glycol asparaginase (PEG-ASPA), a modified form of L-asparaginase, has better activity and lesser immunogenicity than its native molecule.
AIM: To evaluate on a compassionate basis, the combination of Daunoxome and PEG-ASPA, as regard to efficacy and toxicity, as a salvage treatment in refractory/relapsed childhood ALL.
METHODS: The combination of these 2 drugs were used in 9 multiple relapsed or refractory ALL children on the basis of: DNX weekly 100 mg/m2 D1, 8, 15. PEG-ASPA single, 2500IU/m2 dose D15. Vinca alkaloids and corticosteroids were associated.
RESULTS: Median hospital stay was 4 days (0-55).
COMPLICATIONS: Neutropenia grade IV n=4, grade III infection n=6, grade II cardiac toxicity n=1, grade III allergy, grade III hemostasis disorders, thrombosis, n=1 respectively. All patients achieved complete remission (CR) except one who died from disease progression. 8 patients were subjected to hematopoietic stem cell transplantatation (HSCT). Two patients of them are alive and well, 4 died from transplant related causes and 2 from disease progression.
CONCLUSION: Salvage treatment containing DNX and PEG-ASPA, of small sample childhood ALL with very advanced disease, is feasible as regard toxicity and response rate allowing to HSCT and possible cure.

Anthracycline compounds including daunorubicin are the foundation of many modem chemotherapeutic regimens. However, the side-effects of these compounds can be severe, leading to alopecia, nausea, immune deficiency, and cardiotoxicity. For immunocompromised patients with aggressive Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), these complications often preclude the completion of appropriate chemotherapeutic regimens. This review focuses on the development and efficacy of liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome; DNX) carriers for the treatment of KS. Encouragingly, DNX demonstrated increased in vivo stability and specificity. As a result, KS patients benefit from higher cumulative chemotherapeutic doses without significant cardiotoxicity. Tumor response to DNX treatment surpasses that of non-encapsulated daunorubicin and is similar to that observed with conventional multi-drug therapies such as ABV (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine). Moreover, some reports indicate the patient quality of life during therapy may improve with DNX treatment. Although the development of DNX represents a significant advance in KS therapy, recent data suggest that additional modification of the liposomal carrier to include pegylation or target specific antibodies may further increase daunorubicin efficacy in the future.

To investigate the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) in comparison with conventional daunorubicin, 14 patients aged 28 to 60 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia were treated for 1 day with DaunoXome (50 mg/m) and for 2 days with daunorubicin (50 mg/m) with concomitant Ara-C (7 days, 200 mg/m, continuous IV). Eleven of the 14 patients entered complete remission; 9 are still alive. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained by blood sampling at appropriate intervals on days 1 to 4. Daunorubicin and daunorubicinol concentrations in plasma and in peripheral leukemic blast cells were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Following liposomal daunorubicin administration, the peak values and plasma area under the curve (AUC) were more than 100 times higher than after administration of conventional daunorubicin (AUC, 176 vs. 0.98 micromol/L x hour), but the intracellular AUCs were comparable (759 vs. 715 micromol/L x hour). Intracellular concentrations after DaunoXome peaked later and half as high as after daunorubicin. After DaunoXome versus daunorubicin, plasma clearance was 0.001 versus 0.4 micromol/h, respectively. The volume of distribution was 5.5 L for DaunoXome, versus 3640 L for daunorubicin, indicating low tissue affinity for the liposomal formulation. The authors conclude that liposomal daunorubicin, DaunoXome, yields 2-log higher plasma concentrations but similar intracellular concentrations of daunorubicin and its metabolite daunorubicinol than does free daunorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Despite a decreased incidence of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) due to the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy, approximately 15% of AIDS patients still develop AIDS-related KS. This study evaluated the clinical benefit, tumor response, and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of AIDS-related KS.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, multicenter study that randomized patients with AIDS-related KS to six cycles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m2; n = 60) or liposomal daunorubicin (40 mg/m2; n = 19) every 2 weeks. Clinical benefit was assessed using patient questionnaires and monitoring of KS-associated symptoms. Tumor responses were assessed using imaging techniques, direct measurement of skin lesions, and photographs, when possible.
RESULTS: Clinical benefit was observed in 48/60 patients (80%) receiving pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and was maintained for a median of 62 days (range, 28-107 days). Clinical benefit was achieved by 12/19 patients (63.2%) receiving liposomal daunorubicin and was maintained for a median of 55 days (range, 28-84 +days). Clinical benefit correlated with tumor response. Tumor responses were achieved by 55.0% of patients receiving pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 31.6% of patients receiving liposomal daunorubicin. Response rates were similar within each treatment group when only those patients without changes in antiretroviral therapy during treatment were considered. Adverse events associated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin were neutropenia (30%), nausea (28.3%), and asthenia (16.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is safe and effective for the treatment of AIDS-related KS, with most patients experiencing clinical benefit, tumor response, or both.

BACKGROUND: Economic analyses of agents used in the treatment of AIDS and opportunistic diseases are particularly important in developing countries.
PURPOSE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS) chemotherapy regimens in Brazil.
METHOD: A decision-analysis model was developed, and effectiveness data were derived from randomized phase III trials evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), liposomal daunorubicin (DNX), and the ABV regimen (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine). Resource data on direct medical costs were obtained from local sources.
RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness estimates (defined as average costs per patient who responds completely or partially) favored PLD (US $10,272/responder) in comparison to DNX (US $16,263/responder). Regarding cost-effectiveness, the ABV regimen that is widely used in developing countries had better results when compared to both PLD (US $1,268 vs. US $10,271) and DNX (US $1,268 vs. US $16,260). The incremental cost per additional responder of using PLD instead of ABV was US $20,990. Sensitivity analyses suggest that these results hold over a wide range of assumptions.
CONCLUSION: ABV seems to be the most reasonable treatment option for AIDS-KS patients in resource-limited countries like Brazil.

Anthracyclines are effective in the treatment of leukemia, but their use is limited because of cardiotoxicity. Liposomal daunorubicin (L-DNR) is potentially less cardiotoxic than daunorubicin (DNR). We compared in vitro cytotoxicity in pediatric acute leukemia samples and found no significant differences between cytotoxicity of DNR and L-DNR.

Anthracyclines are widely used in paediatric oncology, but their use is limited by the risk of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Encapsulating anthracyclines in liposomes may reduce cardiac toxicity and possibly increase drug availability to tumours. A phase I study in paediatric patients was designed to establish the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after a single course of liposomal daunorubicin, 'DaunoXome', as a 1 h infusion on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Patients were stratified into two groups according to prior treatment: Group A (conventional) and group B (heavily pretreated patients). Dose limiting toxicity was expected to be haematological, and a two-step escalation was planned, with and without G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in parallel. In all, 48 patients aged from 1 to 18 years were treated. Dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both groups. Maximum tolerated dose was defined as 155 mg m(-2) for Group A and 100 mg m(-2) for Group B. The second phase with G-CSF was interrupted because of evidence of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity was reported in a total of 15 patients in this study. DaunoXome shares the early cardiotoxicity of conventional anthracyclines in paediatric oncology. This study has successfully defined a haematological MTD for DaunoXome, but the significance of this is limited given the concerns of delayed cardiac toxicity. The importance of longer-term follow-up in patients enrolled into phase I studies has been underestimated previously, and may lead to an under-recognition of important adverse events.

The treatment of relapsed adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is frequently unsuccessful with current chemotherapy regimens, and often there is an overexpression of multidrug resistance (MDR)-related proteins. Liposomal encapsulation makes daunorubicin (DNR) less sensitive to the efflux effect of P-glycoprotein (PGP), and in vitro data indicate that liposomal-encapsulated DNR (Daunoxome-DNX) is more toxic than DNR against ALL cell lines. In this study, we assessed the in vivo and in vitro efficacy and toxicity of DNX plus cytarabine (Ara-C) as reinduction chemotherapy in 25 relapsed ALL patients (pts). The expression of MDR-related proteins (PGP, MRP1 and LRP) was also analysed. Of the 25 pts, 12 were males and 13 females; median age was 32 yr (range 18-58). Six cases were ALL T and 19 ALL B; eight pts were Ph+ (32%), and nine Bcr-Abl+ (36%). The expression of MDR-related proteins, and DNR and DNX retention and induction of apoptosis in leukaemic cells were evaluated in all cases. Seventeen of 25 (68%) pts were at first relapse and eight (32%) at second or subsequent relapse. The DNX was given in a dose of 80 mg/m(2)/d (days 1-3) in 11/25 pts (44%) and in a dose of 100 mg/m(2)/d (days 1-3) in 14/25 pts (66%). In all pts, Ara-C was administered in a dose of 2 g/m(2) (days 1-5). Twenty pts (80%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and two (8%) entered a partial remission (PR) for an overall response (OR) rate of 88% (22/25), with a tolerable toxicity and without significant cardiotoxicity. Before the start of DNX therapy, 18/25 (72%) cases overexpressed at least one MDR-related protein compared with 9/25 (36%) cases with MDR overexpression at diagnosis (P = 0.01). Taking into account the small number of cases, the response rate was not affected by MDR expression and the in vitro results also showed a higher uptake and apoptotic cell death by DNX compared with DNR. Twelve pts subsequently underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (11 unrelated donor BMT, and one sibling BMT). The overall survival was 39% after 12 months. These data show the efficacy (OR rate 88% and CR rate 80%) of DNX plus Ara-C as reinduction therapy in very poor-risk ALL pts and the response rate seems not to be affected by MDR overexpression. Moreover, the high rate of remissions and the good clinical tolerance in heavily pretreated pts suggest a promising role of DNX in ALL chemotherapy regimens.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Liposomal daunorubicin has been used to treat hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma (MM). The goal was to evaluate efficacy, side-effects and toxicity of liposomal daunorubicin and dexamethasone ("DD Protocol").
DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at Sírio-Libanês, São Camilo, Brasil and Alemão Oswaldo Cruz hospitals.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with active MM received four cycles of liposomal daunorubicin intravenously for two hours (25-30 mg/m(2)/day) on three consecutive days per month, with oral dexamethasone (10 mg every six hours) on four consecutive days three times a month.
RESULTS: The male/female ratio was 1:1 and median age 60. Nine patients were stage IIA, ten IIIA and one IIIB. The median from diagnosis to starting DD was 13 months. All patients received four cycles, except one. Fifteen had already received chemotherapy before DD. Responses of > 50% reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein were observed in six patients after first cycle (30%), six after second (30%) and four after third (20%), while four (20%) did not obtain this. Initially, 17 patients (85%) had anemia: 12 (70%) achieved correction. Progressive disease was observed in three patients (15%), while one had minimal response, four (20%) partial and 12 (60%) complete. Hematological toxicity was acceptable: three patients (15%) had neutrophils < 1,000/mm(3); none had thrombocytopenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild: nausea (10%), anorexia (15%) and no vomiting.
CONCLUSIONS: This treatment has mild toxicity and good response rate. It may therefore be feasible before autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Relapsed or refractory leukemia remains the most common therapeutic problem in pediatric oncology. Particularly challenging is the patient who has recurrence following a stem cell transplant. Insights into the molecular pathogenesis of the leukemias have produced an array of new agents. These new agents will be more selective in hitting their targets, and so their use will be more narrowly defined than with classical cytotoxic drugs. These new agents include all-trans retinoic acid, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, imatinib mesylate, rituximab, and a bevy of signal transduction inhibitors and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Other new agents, such as liposomal daunorubicin, PEG-asparaginase, or clofarabine, represent chemical modifications of established antileukemic drugs. Increasingly, molecular profiling will be used to guide the development and application of new drugs.

Richter's syndrome, that is, transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to a large cell or immunoblastic lymphoma, occurs in up to 10% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The onset of Richter's syndrome is characterized by worsening systemic symptoms, rapid tumor growth, and/or extranodal involvement. Median survival with conventional chemotherapy is less than 6 months. Therapy with more recent therapeutic regimens, such as hyperCVXD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, liposomal daunorubicin, and dexamethasone), augmented hyperCVXD, and yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, has not produced major improvements in response rates or overall survival. Improvement in the outcome of patients with Richter's syndrome may be aided by a more comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of Richter's syndrome; therapy could then be targeted against specific abnormalities. Current data indicate that the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to a large-cell or immunoblastic lymphoma is associated with abnormalities in cell cycle regulation (e.g., loss of the cell cycle inhibitors p16(INK4a) and p27(KIP1) ) and DNA repair (e.g., mutations and/or deletions of the p53, ATM, and p14(ARF) genes and epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 gene). However, the critical event leading to transformation is unclear. Given the poor prognosis of patients with Richter's syndrome, every effort should be made to enroll these patients into clinical trials evaluating novel agents with the appropriate correlative studies.

Among several drug delivery systems, liposomal encapsulated anti-cancer agents represent an advanced and versatile technology. Several formulations of liposomal anthracyclines are approved, e.g. for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (pegylated and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) or AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal daunorubicin). Meanwhile, virtually all anti-cancer drugs have been encapsulated in liposomes using different technologies. This review will summarize preclinical and clinical data of approved and exemplary emerging liposomal anti-cancer agents.

Altered pharmacokinetics of liposomal formulations of drugs can diminish toxicity and allow the administration of the encapsulated drug at high doses. The liposomal formulation of daunorubicin (DaunoXome, L-DNR) has been reported to produce high mean area under the plasma curve (AUC) levels due to a slow distribution of the liposomal moiety into the body and also to reduce the conversion of daunorubicin to the toxic, but inactive, daunorubicinol. Animal and in vitro studies have shown increased intratumor and intracellular levels of the drug, resulting in enhanced cytotoxicity, even in multidrug-resistant cell lines, while normal tissue toxicity, including cardiotoxicity, may be reduced. L-DNR has been tested as a single agent or in combination with arabinosyl cytosine in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in relapse or in patients with newly diagnosed AML or with disease failing initial remission-induction therapy. The results have indicated that L-DNR can be used at high doses, up to 150 mg/m(2) for 3 days, safely with acceptable toxicity. The anti-leukemia activity has been reported to be at least equal or superior to that of free daunorubicin. Mucositis appeared more frequently than cardiotoxicity and high complete remission rates have been reported in patients with AML in first relapse. However, the superiority of L-DNR with regard to efficacy and toxicity will only be shown by prospective clinical studies comparing?L-DNR with free daunorubicin or other regimens. Two comparative trials are currently active in AML patients, one in children and another in the elderly, run by the international BFM and GIMEMA groups, respectively.